News

Russian Government Appoints Anti-Terrorist Department to Search for Hermitage CEO

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe 

MOSCOW, Russia – The Russian government assigned the Anti-Terrorist Department of the Russian Interior Ministry to search for Hermitage CEO, William Browder. Browder is charged with illegally obtaining $70 million of stock in the energy company, Gazprom.

Russian government commences a search for Hermitage CEO, William Browder. (Photo Courtesy of RFE/RL)

General Major Sergei Borodulin of the Russian Interior Ministry commenced the latest sanctions against Mr. Browder. He is the same Russian official who authorized the opening of a posthumous criminal case against Sergei Magnitsky.

Despite the fact that this particular case has no legal foundation because the Gazprom shares were in fact purchased in open market transactions, a Moscow court issued an arrest warrant in absentia for the former Browder. The court accepted the arguments that Browder may influence witnesses or obstruct the criminal inquiry. As a result, Browder should be arrested to prevent such actions.

The court also supported the assertion Browder is actually currently hiding from Russian law enforcement agencies.

This will be the first case in Russian history where a foreign investor is “retroactively and arbitrarily” charged for conducting legal transactions.

Lt. Colonel A.K. Gubanov of the Anti-Terrorist Department visited the second secretary of the British embassy in Moscow “searching” for Browder. Gubanov’s search disregarded diplomatic protocol and legal procedures for police searches and mutual legal assistance requests.

Gubanov and another Russian police officer, Major P.I. Tambovtsev, requested that the British diplomat sign a Russian Interior Ministry procedure. However, the British diplomat declined to do so.

G.R. Sungurov, head of the 4th section of the Russian Interior Ministry’s Investigation Department, who is in charge of fighting organized crime and corruption, coordinated the latest search efforts for Browder.

A Hermitage Capital representative stated, “The misuse of the anti terrorist police in pursuing a political vendetta in relation to the Magnitsky Act shows how desperate the Russian authorities have become to try to protect their bank accounts and travel privileges. By the Russian government diverting their most important anti terrorist personnel at this sensitive time for private corrupt purposes is a clear sign of a complete breakdown in the law enforcement system in Russia.”

The warrant will have a very insignificant effect on Browder and his business relationships. Hermitage Capital’s interactions in Russia were minimized after Browder was barred from entering Russia in 2006.

For further information, please see:

Law and Order In Russia – Russian Government Employs Anti-Terrorist Unit to Search for Hermitage CEO in Retaliation for the US Magnitsky Act – 22 April 2013

RFE/RL – Moscow Seeks Arrest of Late Magnitsky’s Boss – 22 April 2013

Russia Beyond the Headlines – Moscow Court Orders Arrest of Magnitsky Boss Browder – 22 April 2013

The Voice of Russia – Russia Seeks Arrest of Late Magnitsky’s US-Born Boss – 22 April 2013

Gone With The Birds, Electoral Rumblings In Venezuela

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela – Hugo Chavez’s handpicked legacy has a lot of work in front of him. As Nicholas Maduro was sworn in earlier this week he already faces immense hardships. Maduro is inheriting food and medical shortages, chronic power outages, one of the world’s highest homicide rates, potential electoral fraud and a constituency that doesn’t respect him.

New President Maduro faces allegations of electoral strong arming from opposition. (Photo courtesy of BBC)

After Chavez’s death, Hugo seemed like the obvious choice. Vice President and acting President Maduro was poised to retake the presidency as emergency elections were instated. However Maduro lacked the pure charisma that Chavez used to unite the country behind, and many thought he would face problems getting voters back in the booth. Gaffes, and accusations were levied at him by opposition aimed to discredit him and build the base of opposition candidate Henrique Capriles.

A former bus driver, without a college degree, the most telling story that arose from Venezuelan media, was the “very small bird” who gave him his blessing to become President. Maduro told newspapers, that after Chavez’s death a bird in Barinas communicated to him via whistling the spirit of Hugo Chavez, giving him the drive to be President.

Spirituality aside, Maduro was not able to ignite the fire in the voters as Chavez was. Unlike 60+% Win by Chavez over Capriles, Maduro officially beat Capriles by 200,000 votes, or less than 2 percent. Even before the voting had been tallied, many were calling foul play. Stories arose of uncounted votes, ballot boxes thrown in ditches and strong arming from local motorcycle gangs of “Chavistas” or supporters of Chavez.

In order to appease the frantic the dissidents within the country, an audit of the electoral process was demanded and agreed to before Maduro was sworn in, a process that would take approximately a month to complete. Opposition candidate believes there is enough evidence due to the ballot irregularities to believe he has won the election.

The audit was demanded by Capriles, backed by the United States, and urged on by Brazil and the Union of Southern American Countries, insisting that Maduro’s legacy is not shadowed by doubt. The accuracy of the audit however is another issue; many doubt whether it will produce a fair outcome considering Venezuela’s shaky past. In Chavez’ decade and a half reign, individuals were stripped of their right to free speech and due process, lowered the reach of the judiciary, and helped eliminate independent media sources.

For more information, please see:

Wall Street Journal – Latin Leaders Abandon Democracy In Venezuela – 21 April 2013

BBC – Venezuela Election Official Plays Down Vote Audit – 20 April 2013

Fox News Latino – Venezuela’s Maduro Endures Rough Inauguration Day – 20 April 2013

Huffington Post – Nicolas Maduro Assures Hugo Chavez Appeared To Him As A ‘Little Bird’ To Bless Him (VIDEO) – 3 April 2013

Anti-Corruption Leader Faces Politically-Motivated Embezzlement Charges

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

KIROV, Russia – The embezzlement trial of prominent opposition leader and anticorruption blogger Aleksei Navalny, 36, began last Wednesday for forty minutes, only to be adjourned for a week to give the defense more time to review the twenty-nine-volume case file.  The trial, taking place in Kirov, a twelve hour train ride northeast from Moscow where Navalny and others interested reside, is the first against such a high-level opposition figure since Soviet times.  Navalny established himself as the most eloquent of the protest leaders with a huge Internet following with sharply-written blogs [eng] and corruption exposes.

Posters advertising a protest in support of Navalny prior to the beginning of his trial in Kirov on Wednesday. (Photo Courtesy of the Moscow Times)

Accusing President Vladimir Putin of orchestrating the trial, Navalny claims the best outcome he can probably expect is a suspended sentence, which would still render him ineligible for public office; he had expressed an interest earlier this month in one day running for the presidency.  Before heading to Kirov Navalny said, “I think it’s clear to any objective observer that I’m not guilty.”  However, he continued, “I am absolutely certain that it will end in a conviction for me.”

Chief among the accusations against Navalny is the theft of 16 million rubles ($510,000) from a timber firm in Kirov, when he was working for Kirov’s governor.  If convicted, the crime carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.  Regional Investigators twice looked into the alleged theft and closed the cased in Navalny’s favor for lack of evidence, only for the case to be reopened by Moscow.

Furthermore, Navalny has also been accused of stealing 100 million rubles ($3.2 million) from the now-defunct Union of the Right Cause Party, unlawfully privatizing a distillery in the Kirov region, and, along with his brother Oleg, defrauding a local branch of cosmetics maker Yves Rocher.

The images painted by the charges contrast strongly with the man who first came to prominence by exposing corruption in state-controlled companies on his blog and with published articles.  Navalny went on to publicize the undeclared properties and bank accounts of government officials.  Officials no fear the idea of being exposed in his blog.

Additionally, a fifth investigation was opened on Thursday, after the adjournment, as Navalny was traveling back to Moscow by the twelve-hour train.  The new investigation alleges Navalny and his convinced the Multi-Industry Processing Company (MPK) into signing a disadvantageous contract with them, and then pocketing the money.

According to Political analyst Pavel Salin, investigators had been ordered to assemble an “ironclad” case. “Four charges weren’t enough, so they created a fifth,” he said; suggesting the government pressured MPK into filing the complaint.

Navalny has dismissed the charges as “ridiculous” and, believing the public to be the fairer judge, posted all the case materials online.  He explained that “There are bank documents, and we show those documents to everybody: to the investigation, to the public, to everyone. And everybody, apart from the investigation… said, ‘oh God this has been totally fabricated.’ But the investigation is not interested in this.”

Should Navalny be convicted, he could face up to 10 years in prison.  Even if he receives a suspended sentence, he would still lose his law license, from which he derives most of his income, and would be ineligible to ever run for public office, as dictated by a sweeping elections reform bill recently granted preliminary approval.

Navalny is certain that the charges against him are politically motivated, designed to silence him over his criticism of Putin.  Earlier this month, a spokesman for Russia’s Investigative Committee admitted in an interview that normally local authorities would have handled “banal embezzlement” investigations, but Navalny’s  case became federal because of Navalny’s fierce antigovernment activities.  Vladimir Markin said when someone “teases the authorities,” it attracts the Investigative Committee’s attention and the case is expedited.

Although Konstantin Zaitsev, the senior official at the court, denies governmental pressure for a guilty verdict—”If there is no proof, he will be acquitted”— Navalny’s prospects for acquittal do not look good.  More than 99 percent of Russian trials end with a guilty verdict, and the presiding judge, Sergei Blinov, has issued 130 guilty verdicts and no acquittals in the last two years.  Furthermore, Judge Blinov has refused to hold any preliminary hearings, which Navalny’s lawyers say is illegal.

However, Judge Blinov did grant the defense a week adjournment to better prepare, although the defense had requested a month.  The trial will resume on April 24.

Russian media has portrayed Navalny’s popularity bleakly, pointing out that many people outside urban areas are unfamiliar with him.  However, his core among the middle class and urban youth is strong.  Nevertheless, his recognition is growing, and this trial will not only increase Navalny’s name, but send a message the Moscow is afraid of a blogger with a cult following who made himself first known attacking corruption online.

“About thirty per cent of people here have heard of him, and of those, only a few know the details of the case,” says Nikolai Lyaskin, one of Mr Navalny’s associates, explaining the political climate in the Kirov region as the trial began. “It’s not a case of being pro-Putin or anti-Putin, people have just been put into a state where they simply don’t care about politics and assume that everyone is cynical and corrupt. We are trying to tell them that here they have a chance to look at things for themselves and make up their own minds.”

Even so, as Navalny’s trial began, he received much support from opposition leaders and government critics.

“Everyone who came here today knows that Navalny is innocent of the charges that the state has filed against him. But we also know that despite his innocence, he will be convicted,” human rights leader and former dissident Lyudmila Alexeyeva, 85, told the crowd in Kirov.

Opposition lawmaker Dmitry Gudkov, who was also in Kirov, condemned the trial.  “I came here to support Aleksei because I think this case is political and the investigation is biased. The case is being fabricated in front of our own eyes,” Gudkov said.

Opposition leader Boris Nemtsov was also present in the courtroom.  “There was no transgression [in Navalny’s actions], period,” he said. “It is all an order from above, it is all about politics; it is all about revenge. They just want to jail him to scare the others and, of course, to neutralize Navalny himself.”

Finally, Navalny told reporters: “We will definitely win this case. No matter what the ruling is, I am absolutely confident that we will prove our innocence and it will be clear to everybody that this is a political trial.”

For further information, please see:

Moscow Times – New Charge Makes Five Against Navalny – 19 April 2013

RFE/RL – Russian Opposition Leader’s Trial Adjourned In Kirov – 18 April 2013

The Independent – ‘This Case is Nonsense’: Defiant Anti-Corruption Blogger Alexei Navalny Goes on Trial as Vladimir Putin Brings his Biggest Critic to the Dock – in Russia’s Dissident Heartland – 17 April 2013

Moscow Times – Ahead of Trial, Navalny Has Jail Bag Packed – 17 April 2013

RFE/RL – The Trial Of The Decade – 16 April 2013

RFE/RL – Russia Admits Politics Played Role In Navalny Case – 12 April 2013

UNICEF: CAR Rebels Still Recruiting Child Soldiers

By Ryan Aliman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

BANGUI, Central African Republic – Rebel groups continue to recruit child soldiers according to a report released by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) last week.

 

Young members of the Seleka rebel alliance were spotted patrolling near the Ledger Plaza Bangui hotel in Bangui last March 2013. (Photo courtesy of Associated Press)

Based on the UNICEF report, roughly around 2,000 children in Central African Republic (CAR) have been enlisted by various militias since last month’s takeover of the capital, Bangui.

“We have verified cases, but no precise number. What we are hearing from partners in the field is that there has been an increase in terms of the geographic scope and the magnitude of the practice. . . Children are recruited to be used as spies, porters, messengers, cooks, in addition to fighting on the front lines as well,” UNICEF spokeswoman Marixie Mercado said.

Several journalists for the Associated Press (AP) personally witnessed dozens of young boys patrolling Bangui. “They were riding in pickup trucks with other rebels and in some cases on foot patrol, always closely supervised by older, heavily armed fighters,” wrote Krista Larson, one of the AP journalists at Bangui. When approached by the AP reporters, one of the young soldiers revealed to them that he is 14 years old and joined the Seleka rebel alliance three months ago.

The UNICEF report states, however, that despite such “clear evidence of the continuing recruitment and use of children by armed groups”, Seleka officers persistently deny this practice.

In fact, the country’s new information minister, Christophe Gazam Betty, disagrees with the figures given by the UNICEF. Betty insisted that there are only about 40 child soldiers who are still with the Seleka group. “If there are combatants who are under the age of 18, there is a system in place through the United Nations,” he said. “They will be separated and picked up by UNICEF.”

Declaring it as a grave violation of international law, the UNICEF explicitly condemned the use of child soldiers.

“Recruiting children is both morally unacceptable and prohibited under international law,” said Souleymane Diabate, UNICEF’s country representative. “We have called on the new leadership in CAR to ensure that all children associated with armed groups should be released immediately and protected from further violations,” Diabate added.

The UNICEF remains hopeful that the rebels will heed the organization’s call to end the practice. In the report, the UNICEF cited previous instances where the rebel groups who make up the alliance currently in power have successfully disarmed their young members.

“Some child soldiers can be returned to their families or to other relatives. Others will be placed in foster homes where possible, though some will be given training on living independently,” Shannon Struthers, UNICEF senior adviser for emergencies, told the press as she explained the process of disarming children in CAR.

 

For further information, please see:

Associated Press – Child Soldiers Patrol C. African Republic Capital – 20 April 2013

AfriqueJet – CAR: UNICEF says CAR rebels still recruiting child-soldiers – 13 April 2013

UPI – UNICEF: Central African Republic still recruiting child-soldiers – 12 April 2013

Voice of America – UN: CAR Groups Still Recruiting Child Soldiers – 12 April 2013

Goodluck Jonathan Considers Granting Insurgents an Amnesty

By Ryan Aliman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

ABUJA, Nigeria – Last Wednesday, President Goodluck Jonathan announced a new committee that will work on an amnesty deal with insurgent groups including Boko Haram.

President Goodluck Jonathan is scheduled to inaugurate the National Security Council on Wednesday at the Council Chambers of the Presidential Villa, Abuja. (Photo courtesy of BBC News)

“Goodluck Jonathan has approved the constitution of a Presidential Committee to constructively engage key members of Boko Haram and define a comprehensive and workable framework for resolving the crisis of insecurity,” his office said in a statement.

This new Presidential committee, also known as the National Security Council, is tasked to develop a framework under a Federal Government dialogue through which disarmament of extremist groups could take place within a 60-day time frame. After the deadline, the government is expected to offer members of these groups amnesty for as long as they guarantee that they will no longer fight government troops and harm civilians.

“The 26-member committee will also develop a support programme for victims of the Boko Haram crisis as well as produce mechanisms to address the underlying causes of insurgencies,” Presidential spokesperson Reuben Abati added.

The National Security Council, which aims to put an end to the series of bombings and shootings in the northern region of the country, is based on a program similar to the one created in 2009. The 2009 program proved to be successful in quelling the insurgency in Nigeria’s oil-rich southern delta.

On the contrary, several human rights activists believe that granting extremist groups an amnesty “will not work”.

To begin with, it remains highly uncertain whether or not these groups will accept a deal with and concede to the government, they pointed out.

Shehu Sani, a well-known activist who rejected his own nomination onto the committee, told AFP that the lack of coordination among committee members may cause the program’s failure. “I suggested the need to consult the leadership of the (Boko Haram) group discreetly through some names I mentioned in order to get their input,” Sani said. “That advice was ignored. This new government approach will not get us anywhere and I don’t want to soil my reputation,” he continued as he explained his reason for turning down his nomination.

Thomas Mösch, head of Deutsche Welle’s Hausa Service, also asserted that the new program should not be expected to be successful just because the previous one was. “In the Niger Delta, we had groups that were interested in economic improvement, first of all for themselves and for their local communities. With Boko Haram it is totally different. First of all, we don’t have one group that follows a specific strategy, if they do – it is not visible. Then the core group of Boko Haram when they started with their violent attacks were taking revenge for the killings of their own leader and brothers,” Mösch said.

 

For further information, please see:

All Africa – Nigeria: Datti Ahmed Rejects Amnesty Committee – 19 April 2013

All Africa – Nigeria: As Jonathan Names Amnesty Panel, Boko Haram to Get 60 Days to Disarm – 18 April 2013

All Africa – Nigeria Pushes Amnesty Plan for Islamist Militants – 18 April 2013

IOL News – Nigeria edges towards amnesty deal – 18 April 2013

Reuters – Nigeria president considers amnesty for Islamist rebels – 17 April 2013