News

War Criminal Bosco Ntaganda Transferred to the ICC

By Hannah Stewart
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Congolese warlord Bosco Ntaganda was taken from the American Embassy in Kigali, Rwanda on Friday and placed on a flight to The Hague, where he faces charges in the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Congolese rebel leader Bosco Ntaganda. (Photo Courtesy of The Economist)

The litany of charges includes ten counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, accusing him of conscripting and using child soldiers, using rape as a weapon of war, keeping women as sex slaves, and massacring at least 800 people in 2002 and 2003.

Ntaganda, whose nickname is “The Terminator” for his ruthless nature in battle, became a symbol of impunity in Africa in the last decade.

He shocked the international community when he entered the embassy on Monday, removed his disguise, and asked to be sent to the ICC.  The Court said it “was the first time that a suspect has surrendered himself voluntarily to be in the ICC’s custody.”

Since Monday, the United States has urged Rwanda to help facilitate Ntaganda’s passage to The Hague.  However, Rwanda and the United States are not parties to the Rome Statute, and therefore neither country is a member of the ICC.  Nevertheless the United States says it supports the Court’s work.

As such, Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame publicly stated his support for Ntaganda’s expeditious transfer to the ICC.

The ICC first indicted Ntaganda in 2006 for conscripting and using child soldiers during a 2002-2003 Congo conflict.  A second indictment, issued July 2012, accused him of a range of crimes including murder, ethnic persecution and rape.

Despite these indictments, Ntaganda joined the Congolese army in 2009 pursuant to a peace deal that allowed for him and his men to integrate into the military.  As a result, he lived freely in the North Kivu capital of Goma.  He often dined in top restaurants and played tennis, seemingly without fear of arrest.

Reports state that last year, when the agreement between Ntaganda and the Congolese government deteriorated, he and his troops defected.  His faction became known as “M23,” battling Congolese government troops in the country’s mineral-rich east.

While unconfirmed, it is believed that Ntaganda surrendered due to recent vulnerability.  Reports state that the M23 rebel fractured into two parts last month over the decision to bow to international pressure and withdraw from Goma late last year.  Ntaganda and Jean-Marie Runiga, opposed the retreat.  However, another rebel leader, Sultani Makenga, ordered the retreat and initiated peace talks with the Congo government.

Some speculate that Rwanda’s cooperation in Ntaganda’s transfer may come at a cost.  His testimony before the ICC could potentially reveal details of Rwanda’s alleged support for M23 during the Congo conflict.

“This is a good day for victims in the [Democratic Republic of the Congo] and for international justice,” said Fatou Bensouda, the prosecutor at the ICC.  Likewise, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called the transfer “an important moment for all who believe in justice and accountability.”

On Friday afternoon, the Court said in an e-mail that Ntaganda was “in the ICC’s custody.”

To learn more about Ntaganda’s crimes in interviews with his victims, please watch this short video uploaded by the Washington Post: “A Powerful Video on War Criminal Ntaganda”

For more information, please see:

AP News – International Court Detains Rwandan-Born Warlord – 22 March 2013

BBC – Bosco Ntaganda: Kagame Promises to Help Transfer to ICC – 22 March 2013

The Economist (blog) – A Surprising Surrender – 22 March 2013

The New York Times – War Crimes Suspect Leaves Congo for The Hague – 22 March 2013

Cameroon Among the Top For Most Aggressive Homosexual Prosecutions

By Ryan Aliman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

YAOUNDE, Cameroon – Cameroon has one of the most aggressive “homosexuality” prosecutions in the world, according to a report released Thursday by four human rights groups.

Local residents in Ambam, a small town in Cameroon, stand by during the trial of two women accused of homosexuality. (Photo courtesy of Huffington Post)

In cooperation with Alternatives-Cameroun, Association for the Defense of Gays and Lesbians (ADEFHO), and the Cameroonian Foundation for AIDS (CAMFAIDS), Human Rights Watch (HRW) conducted 10 case studies of arrests and prosecutions under article 347 bis of Cameroon’s penal code. Based on this statute, having sexual relations with the same sex is punishable by up to five years of imprisonment.

In their 55-page report, “Guilty by Association: Human Rights Violations in the Enforcement of Cameroon’s Anti-Homosexuality Law,” the human rights organizations revealed that at least 28 people have been prosecuted for same-sex conduct in Cameroon since 2010. Most of them were tortured, forced to confess, denied access to legal counsel, and subjected to “discriminatory treatment by law enforcement and judicial officials.”

The study also found out that most of the arrests were based solely on suspicion, while most of the convictions were based on little or no evidence.

One man from Limbre who was accused of being gay was beaten with an iron belt, in addition to being forced to swim in the gutter. Local police also burned plastic bags on his chest. Another detainee told the human rights groups that authorities had him “sleep naked on the floor and [they] beat him with clubs on his feet so severely that his toenails fell out.” Other men arrested for homosexuality were subjected to anal exams before being sent to jail.

According to the human rights groups, Cameroon’s anti-homosexual laws “violate international human rights standards and Cameroon’s own constitution”. In the first place, Cameroon ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) that protects the rights to privacy and non-discrimination. Secondly, as pointed out by HRW, Cameroon is a member of the Commonwealth, which has a charter that opposes discrimination on all grounds.

“Our government and our courts need to recognize that when it comes to Cameroon’s international human rights commitments, they cannot pick and choose on the basis of personal biases,” said Alice Nkom, president of ADEFHO.

Last month, the Association of Cameroon Roman Catholic jurists, a group of lawyers affiliated with the Catholic Church in Cameroon, expressed their support for the country’s anti-gay laws. According to the group, such laws prevent same-sex relationships which they, along with Archbishop of Yaoundé Simon-Victor Tonyé Bakot, describe as “a serious crime against humanity”.

The group’s chairperson, Sandrine Soppo, said that fighting homosexuality “is not a question of human rights violations . . . the question was about human dignity.”

 

For further information, please see:

ABC News – Report: Cameroon Officials Torture Gay Suspects – 21 March 2013

Huffington Post – Cameroon Officials Torture Gay Suspects, Says Human Rights Watch Report – 21 March 2013

Human Rights Watch – Cameroon: Rights Abuses in ‘Homosexuality’ Prosecutions – 21 March 2013

LGBTQ Nation – Report: Cameroon most aggressive country in prosecuting suspected gays – 21 March 2013

Africa Review – Cameroon Catholic lawyers vow to uphold anti-gay laws – 25 February 2013

London Court Rules Ban Against Christian Group Advertisement Lawful

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

LONDON, United Kingdom – The High Court ruled Transport for London lawfully ban a Christian group’s bus advertisement that suggests gay people could “change their sexuality” because it would “cause grave offense”.

The Core Issues Trust placed an advertising campaign on London buses carrying the slogan, “Not Gay! Ex Gay, Post Gay and Proud. Get over it!” (Photo Courtesy of The Independent)

On Friday, a judge found that Boris Johnson, chairman of Transport for London, did not abuse his position last April when he imposed the ban on the advertisement. Johnson denounced the “gay cure” advertisement as “offensive to gays”.

Transport for London refused to carry the Core Issues Trust advertisement because it would “likely cause widespread or serious offence to members of the public”, and it contained “images or messages which relate to matters of public controversy and sensitivity”.

Conversely, the recent court decision is viewed as a defeat for the Core Issues Trust group, a Christian charity. This Christian group funds “reparative therapy” for gay Christians, which it claims can “develop their heterosexual potential”.

Core Issues Trust posted ads on buses that stated, “Not Gay! Ex-Gay, Post-Gay and Proud. Get over it.” Many believe Johnson was “politically driven” when he blocked their ad.

Mrs. Justice Lang ruled that Transport for London’s process in placing the ban “was procedurally unfair, in breach of its own procedures and demonstrated a failure to consider the relevant issues”.

However, the judge stated that the unjust procedure was substantially outweighed by factors, such as, it would “cause grave offence” to those who were gay. It could, furthermore, be perceived as homophobic, “thus increasing the risk of prejudice and homophobic attacks.”

Although Justice Lang said she did not think an appeal would succeed, she acknowledged there were “compelling reasons” to allow one.

Following Justice Lang’s ruling, a Transport for London spokesperson said, “The advertisement clearly breached our advertising policy as it contained a controversial message and was likely to cause widespread offence to the public. This was borne out by the hugely negative public reaction the advertisement generated, including on social media and newspaper websites. We are taking steps to address the Judge’s comments regarding our internal processes.”

A Core Issues Trust spokesman stated, “We are grateful for the opportunity to make an appeal and the recognition of the issues around freedom of speech and conscience. We are particularly concerned about the fact ex-gay minorities are not recognized in the legislation of the Equality Act 2010.”

Gay rights group, Stonewall chief, Ben Summerskill, said, “Many people will be pleased by today’s decision. In a city where over half of gay young people face bullying at school, and where tens of thousands of gay people are subjected to hate crimes every year just because of the way they were born, it’s perfectly proper for a mayor to object to the use of such advertising in an iconic public setting.”

For further information, please see:

BBC – ‘Ex-Gay’ London Bus Advert Ban Ruled Lawful – 22 March 2013

The Guardian — Boris Johnson Ban on Christian ‘Gay Cure’ Ad Did Not Break Law, Court Rules – 22 March 2013

The Independent – Boris Johnson Wins Ruling Over Ban on Christian Group’s Controversial ‘Post-Gay and Proud’ Bus Advert – 22 March 2013

Christian Today – Court Hears Gay Bus Ad Case – 01 March 2013

Sultan Qaboos Pardons Protesters in Oman

By Justin Dorman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

MUSCAT, Oman – While the Arab spring led to protests throughout the Middle East, those in Oman have felt it necessary to join in over the past year. As a result of expressing their displeasure with the government and the Sultan, numerous individuals have been detained and imprisoned for their roles and statements made in protests and cyber campaigns.

Approximately fifty individuals detained for defaming the Sultan and unlawfully assembling will be released today on a pardon by the Sultan. (Photo Courtesy of the Guardian)

Many of those detained, were jailed specifically for defaming the sultan. The seventy-two year old Sultan Qaboos bin Said, who has ruled over Oman for the last forty-two years, does not hold too big of a grudge though. The Oman News Agency announced that, “Sultan Qaboos  has issued a royal pardon for those convicted of defamation, information technology crimes and unauthorised rallies.” At least fifty individuals who were sentenced from six to eighteen month jail terms are expected to be released today.

This decision to free all the activists was not completely unprovoked. The sultans pardon came shortly after the negative publicity that arises when approximately thirty detained individuals partake in a two week long hunger strike. The hunger strike began when eleven to seventeen cyber activists chose to protest the delays and denials of receiving appeals. These cyber activists were charged with “unlawful assembly and violating the cyber law.” Eventually, another thirteen imprisoned activists joined their hunger strike.

After fifteen days of not eating, the initial cyber activist hunger strikers were told by the Supreme Court that their appeals would in fact be heard. Just a week later, Sultan Qaboos bin Said announced his royal pardons.

Besides for calling for the release of these protesters, the Sultan is also attempting to respond to many of their concerns. One move the government has taken was to announce a plan to restrict the number of foreign workers in the country in order to decrease domestic employment. Additionally, plans are in the works to greatly increase the minimum wage.

While these improvements sound good on paper, the protesters will not be truly happy until they see they see actual actions taken. There has long been a pledge to increase public specter jobs which has never really come to fruition as the country focuses on its oil export role on the Strait of Hormuz. Until actual change comes, expect more to be detained for defamation against sultan, and eventually more pardons as well.

For further information, please see:

Guardian – Oman’s Sultan Pardons Dissidents who Were Jailed for Defaming him – 22 March 2013

Gulf News – Oman’s Qaboos Pardons Activists – 21 March 2013

Middle East Online – Top Court in Oman Orders Retrial for Jailed Activists – 4 March 2013

Daily News Egypt – 30 Jailed Omani Activists end Hunger Strike: Lawyer – 25 February 2013

New Pope, Same Old LGBT Opinion

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – With the unprecedented resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the quick inauguration of Argentinian bishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio South America rejoices and celebrates the first non-European pope in 700 years. However the ascension of Pope Francis has not been the boon that many activists hoped it would be, with the new pope’s past casting a shadow on the future of the Vatican’s stance on LGBT unions and adoption rights.

The  new Popes ascension leaves many worrying about the Vatican’s new stance on LGBT rights. (Photo courtesy of Al Jazeera)

Fresh on many people’s minds will be how Pope Francis handles the clergy’s sexual abuse scandals that plagued Pope Benedict and the Vatican administration. With the resignation and litigation of many top cardinals, notably Britain’s Keith O’Brien and Los Angeles’s Roger Mahoy, many speculate whether the new pope will take a harsher stance. The question will become whether Pope Francis will continue to shield many complicit with the child abuse cover-ups or remove them from positions of power.

While Argentinians are naturally ecstatic about the selection, many voicing their opinions in support; many gay and lesbian South Americans are naturally skeptical. While many media outlets have noted statements made during 2010 coming out in favor of same-sex civil unions, this may have been us as a political smokescreen for private statements that may represent his, and the churches true views. During Argentina’s 2010 decision to legalize gay marriage with the Marriage Equality Bill he took a hard stance against it, declaring that all children have the fundamental right to be raised by a father and a mother, and not any “sinful” combination of the two.  However realizing that fighting gay marriage may have been a losing battle he insisting on supporting civil unions, as a way to undercut and prevent the passage of the bill.

Despite his attempt to derail the bill, it passed and allowed gays to adopt children without the three-year waiting period. His response? “Gay parenting is a rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.”

While not quite as adversarial as Cardinal Peter Turkson who supported homophobic legislation in Ghana that could make homosexuality punishable by death, Pope Francis does not represent a much more liberal and progressive stance on the issue. Only time will tell if his support of same sex civil unions was legitimate and whether he will shape the Vatican’s opinions of LGBT rights and marriage in a positive way, or whether it will be more and the same from the Golden City.

For more information, please see:

Mommyish – The New Pope Believes He Is The Authority On How Children Should Be Raised And Educated – 15 March 2013

Al Jazeera – Gay Argentine React To Pope Francis – 14 March 2013

News Vatican – Biography: Who Is Jorge Mario Bergoglio – 13 March 2013

NPR – As Pope Resigns, Clergy Abuse Survivors Remember 2008 Meeting – 27 February 2013

Mommyish – The Hypothetical New Pope Might Actually Be More Gay-Hatey Than The Old Pope – 17 February 2013