North America & Oceania

Supreme Court Upholds Controversial Lethal Injection Drug Use

By Samuel Miller
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America and Oceania

WASHINGTON, D.C., United States of America — 

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld the use of a controversial drug for lethal injection in executions; however, the Supreme Court may have opened a larger question about capital punishment, when two justices in the minority newly questioned whether the death penalty violates the Constitution. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote for the majority that included Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

The Supreme Court on Monday Upheld the use of Controversial Lethal Injection Drugs (Photo Courtesy of BBC News)

The Supreme Court re-instated the death penalty in 1976 after having suspended it earlier in the 1970s. Capital punishment is now used in 31 states and by the federal government.

In the case, called Glossip v Gross, three inmates in Oklahoma argued that the sedative could not achieve the level of unconsciousness required for surgery, meaning severe pain and suffering was likely. But the court, in a 5-4 decision, handed a loss to the inmates after judges ruled they did not prove that midazolam was cruel and unusual when compared to known and available alternatives.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, was a departure from a series of legal victories for liberals in recent days, including gay-marriage rights and the preservation of a major component of Obamacare. The court’s majority held that prisoners challenging an execution method as posing an unreasonable risk of severe pain must show that the government has overlooked a more humane method of carrying out capital punishment.

In the majority opinion, Alito writes, “The prisoners failed to identify a known and available alternative method of execution that entails a lesser risk of pain, a requirement of all Eighth Amendment method-of-execution claims.” Alito went on to state, “Second, the District Court did not establish that Oklahoma’s use of a massive dose of midazolam in its execution protocol entails a substantial risk of severe pain.”

The four dissenting justices wrote scathing opinions denouncing the approval of the lethal injections, as well as the prisoner’s right to choose the method for their execution. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor bitterly denounced the court’s holding that those challenging a particular execution protocol had to show that a more humane method was available.

“Under the Court’s new rule, it would not matter whether the State intended to use midazolam, or instead to have petitioners drawn and quartered, slowly tortured to death, or actually burned at the stake: because petitioners failed to prove there was an available alternative, their challenge would automatically fail.”

Justice Stephen Breyer, in his dissent, raised the issue as to whether the death penalty should be interpreted as constitutional. With the concurrence of Justice Ginsberg, Breyer wrote, “We believe it highly likely that the death penalty now violates the Eighth Amendment.”

Several US states turned to midazolam when European manufacturers stopped supplying sodium thiopental to US prisons because of an EU ban on the sale of products used in lethal injections.

The shortage of various drugs used by the 32 US states that still have capital punishment led to some reintroducing other controversial methods, such as the gas chamber and firing squad.

For more information, please see:

BBC News — US Supreme Court backs use of contentious execution drug – 29 June 2015

CNN — Supreme Court backs use of lethal injection drug – 29 June 2015

Politico — Supreme Court permits lethal injection technique – 29 June 2015

Reuters — Supreme Court upholds lethal injections, blocks pollution rule – 29 June 2015

USA Today — Supreme Court refuses to ban controversial method of execution – 29 June 2015

Washington Post — Supreme Court upholds lethal injection procedure – 29 June 2015

President Obama Eulogizes Slain Rev. Clementa Pinckney

By Delisa Morris

Impunity Watch Technical Director

CHARLESTON, South Carolina — President Barack Obama delivered a heart felt eulogy and rousing political speech and a thoughtful reconciliation on race in America when he left the White House for Charleston, South Carolina on Friday to eulogize the Rev. Clementa Pinckney, who was gunned down last week by a racist terrorist during Bible study.

The President surprised the nation when he belted out the chorus of ‘Amazing Grace’ at the end of his speech, bringing the mourners to their feet to join him in song.

“As a nation, out of this terrible tragedy, God has visited grace upon us for he has allowed us to see where we’ve been blind,” Obama said. “He’s given us the chance, where we’ve been lost, to find our best selves.”

From President to Preacher, the President’s remarks often sounded like a sermon with an organ in the background swooning behind the impassioned passages.

The President, first lady Michelle Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, a bipartisan host of high-level members of Congress and Hillary Clinton all attended the memorial service at TD Arena in downtown Charleston. Last Wednesday, a 21-year-old man opened fire at a Bible study inside Charleston’s Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, killing nine.

The shooter declared he was there to “kill black people,” and an online manifesto attributed to him contained white supremacist screeds.

Obama, in his eulogy, said the killer likely assumed he “would deepen divisions that trace back to our nation’s original sin.”

“But God works in mysterious ways,” Obama said. “God had different ideas. He didn’t know he was being used by God.”

“The alleged killer could have never anticipated the way the families of the fallen would respond when they saw him in court in the midst of unspeakable grief, with words of forgiveness,” Obama said.

The country, he argued, has responded to the church shooting “with a thoughtful introspection and self-examination that we so rarely see in public life.”

See President Obama’s full remarks here.

For more information, please see:

CNN – Obama’s Charleston eulogy: ‘Amazing Grace’ – 27 June 2015

DailyMail – Obama’s amazing grace: President gives searing speech on race and leads church in song during emotional eulogy for pastor killed by race-hate gunman – 27 June 2015

The Washington Post – Obama calls for racial understanding, unity as thousands mourn S.C. pastor – 26 June 2015

Whitehouse.gov – Remarks by the President in Eulogy for the Honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney – 26 June 2015

In a Landmark Decision The SCOTUS Has Declared Same-Sex Marriage Legal Across the U.S.

By Delisa Morris

Impunity Watch Technical Director

WASHINGTON, D.C. — On June 26, 2015, a split Supreme Court of The United States ruled that same-sex couples can marry nationwide, establishing a new civil right.

The Whitehouse celebrated the decision with a full rainbow of colors / image courtesy of abcnews.com

In a 5-4 ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority decision with the court four liberal justices.  Each of the four dissenting conservative justices wrote their own dissenting opinions.

Almost 46 years after the Stonewall riots ushered in the modern gay rights movement, the decision marks the end of a major fight for same-sex activists.

“No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family,” Kennedy wrote. “In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than they once were.”

“Their hope,” Kennedy wrote, “is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”

In a dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia blasted the Court’s “threat to American democracy.”

“The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me,” he wrote. “But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch.”

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the decision had “nothing to do with the Constitution.”

“If you are among the many Americans—of whatever sexual orientation—who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal,” he wrote. “Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”

The U.S. has now become the 21st country in the world to legalize same sex marriage, including territories. The decision means that married same-sex couples will enjoy all of the same rights and benefits as married heterosexual couples nationwide and will be recognized on official documents including birth and death certificates.

For more information, please see:

CNN – Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide – 27 June 2015

New York Times – Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide – 26 June 2015

NBC News – Landmark: Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Marriage Legal Nationwide – 26 June 2015

ABC News – Same-Sex Marriage: Supreme Court Rules in Favor, President Obama Calls It ‘Victory for America’ – 26 June 2015

Senate Debate Looms as Patriot Act Temporarily Expires

By Samuel Miller
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America and Oceania

WASHINGTON, D.C., United States of America — Key parts of the Patriot Act expired at midnight, after a bitterly divided Senate adjourned after failing to reach an agreement during a rare Sunday session to extend the anti-terrorism law. However, the Senate did vote to advance the White House backed Freedom Act, so a new form of data collection may be approved in the coming days.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) After Temporarily Blocking the Patriot Act. (Photo Courtesy of NY Times)

The Senate will reconvene at midday Monday to consider changes to the Freedom Act that would curtail the government’s authority to sweep up vast quantities of telephone records.

Hamstrung by procedural rules that require the consent of all lawmakers, the Senate is unable to restore the lapsed authorities until at least Tuesday. The Senate will next vote to end debate Tuesday on the USA Freedom Act, and on amendments intended to make it more palatable.

The USA Freedom Act, backed by the White House and passed earlier by the GOP-led House, easily cleared a filibuster in a 77-17 vote that appeared to set the stage for its eventual passage. The Freedom Act would require the NSA and Federal Bureau of Investigation to obtain phone records for most counterterrorism investigations and other probes on a case-by-case basis from telecommunications companies.

The expiration of three key provisions of the Patriot Act means that, for now, the NSA will no longer collect newly created logs of Americans’ phone calls in bulk. However, the Justice Department may invoke a so-called grandfather clause to keep using those powers for investigations that had started before June 1.

Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, commented on the impact of the USA Freedom Act. “It would probably be the first time since 1978 that Congress has significantly narrowed the government’s surveillance authority or made structural changes to the legal framework that governs foreign intelligence surveillance.”

This new wave of sweeping reform to the NSA surveillance programs authorized by the Government comes following the Edward Snowden leaks in 2013. While the Freedom Act marks a legislative change, the Snowden leaks have led to a number of other changes.

For instance, the White House vowed it would be more transparent about the scope of intelligence gathering, such as declassifying numerous executive orders and legal opinions tied to government surveillance. Additionally, technology companies reached a settlement with the U.S. government which allows firms to disclose more about the national security requests for business or personal information.

However, it is important to note that the end of bulk telephone collection program doesn’t mean the end of debates about national security and privacy.

For more information, please see:

BBC — US surveillance powers expire as Senate deal fails — 1 June 2015

MSNBC — Key Patriot Act provisions expire … for now — 1 June 2015

NY Times — Senate to Take Up Spy Bill as Parts of Patriot Act Expire — 1 June 2015

Politico — Senate fails to save PATRIOT Act — 1 June 2015

Wall Street Journal — U.S. Spy Architecture Pared Back as Part of Patriot Act Expires — 1 June 2015

Indonesia Temporarily Allows Malaysian Refugees Ashore

By Samuel Miller
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America and Oceania

JAKARTA, Indonesia – Indonesia said on Wednesday it would offer shelter to 7,000 Rohingya refugees adrift at sea, but made clear that their assistance was temporary and would take no more. The Indonesian Government stated, the refugees would stay only as long as it took for the Government to process and document the refugees. More than 3,000 migrants have landed so far this month in Malaysia and Indonesia.

A Rohingya Refugee After Weeks at Sea (Photo Courtesy of NY Times)

Rohingya are a Muslim ethnic group fleeing persecution and economic hardship in Myanmar and Bangladesh.

The agreement came as fishermen on the Indonesian island of Sumatra rescued at least 370 migrants from sinking ships and brought them ashore. Maj. Gen. Fuad Basya, chief spokesman of the Indonesian military, said migrants saved by fishermen in Indonesia were on several ships rescued separately on Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning off Aceh Province, on the northern tip of Sumatra.

Those migrants who have made it to shore in Indonesia told stories of weeks of horror and brutality at the hands of the traffickers, who extorted them for money, provided little food or water and then abandoned them on the open sea to evade a crackdown on smuggling networks by the government of Thailand.

The U.N. High Commission on Human Rights (UNHCR) welcomed the decision, saying in a statement that it is “an important initial step in the search for solutions to this issue, and vital for the purpose of saving lives.” The UNHCR went on to say, “It is now urgent for people to be brought ashore without delay. UNHCR agrees with the ministers that further action will be needed. It will need to take into account looking properly at the needs of those in need of international protection.”

The situation, however, is far from resolved. While the migrants from Myanmar may be allowed to apply for asylum in Indonesia, Malaysia or perhaps a third country, experts say those from Bangladesh are mainly economic refugees who are likely to be sent home.

Furthermore, Myanmar does not recognize the Rohingya people and has refused to engage in talks where the term is used. Rohingya Muslims are a long-oppressed linguistic and ethnic minority in Myanmar, a majority Buddhist country. Most of Myanmar’s 1.1 million Rohingya Muslims are stateless and live in apartheid-like conditions. Almost 140,000 were displaced in clashes with ethnic Rakhine Buddhists in 2012.

One issue that was not controversial was human trafficking, which all of the countries involved, including Myanmar, agreed to try to stop.

 

For more information, please see:

CNN — Indonesia, Malaysia agree to take in migrant ships, report says — 21 May 2015

Bloomberg — Malaysia, Indonesia to Shelter Fleeing Rohingya Temporarily — 20 May 2015

NY Times — Indonesia and Malaysia Agree to Care for Stranded Migrants — 20 May 2015

Reuters — Malaysia, Indonesia to let ‘boat people’ come ashore temporarily — 20 May 2015