North America & Oceania

ACLU Challenges Abortion Ban

By Stuart Smith
Impunity Watch, North America Desk

 WASHINGTON, United States- On July 12, 2012, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Arizona, and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed suit on behalf of three Arizona doctors to challenge the constitutionality of the state’s 20-week abortion ban.

Keep Abortion Legal sign (Photo Courtesy of ThinkProgress.org)

Although six states have implemented similar abortion bans, according to the ACLU, Arizona’s ban is the most extreme ban in the nation. The law criminalizes nearly all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy and contains only one narrow exception for immediate medical emergencies.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade, reported MSNBC, legalized abortions nationwide but also allowed states to ban abortions once the fetus became viable – when a fetus could potentially survive outside the womb – except where a risk to the mother’s health existed. According to the Mayo Clinic, a fetus may become viable at 23 weeks of pregnancy.

Arizona’s abortion ban, argues the ACLU, scheduled to take effect August 2, 2012, therefore, bans abortions three weeks before a fetus becomes viable – during a time when the Supreme Court has specifically permitted abortions – and the ban is thus unconstitutional.

The ban would require a physician caring for a woman with a high-risk pregnancy to wait until her condition imposes an imminent risk of death or major medical damage before offering her the care she needs, noted the ACLU in a statement released the day of the lawsuit’s filing.

“Any number of things can happen during a pregnancy, and a woman has to be able to make the right decision for herself and her family,” said Talcott Camp, the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project’s deputy director. “Whether a woman decides to continue with a high-risk pregnancy or terminate it, the most important thing is that women, families and physicians make these decisions – not politicians without any medical training.”

Although the lawsuit is believed to be the first to challenge late-term abortion bans, it comes amidst a broader attack on abortion and reproductive rights in the United States.

On Wednesday, CNN reported, that a federal judge in Mississippi allowed the state’s sole abortion clinic to remain open, while he reviews the effects on abortion clinics of a new state law requiring all abortion providers to be certified obstetrician/gynecologists with privileges at local hospitals. Only one doctor at the clinic currently meets the new standard.

Although supporters of the new law claim that it protects women from unscrupulous and unqualified practitioners, opponents believe the law is a move to further curtail abortion rights in the state. Governor Phil Bryant called it “the first step in a movement, I believe, to do what we campaigned on: to say that we’re going to try to end abortion in Mississippi.”

However, for now, the ACLU is optimistic about their chances of success in court. “No court has ever upheld such an extreme and dangerous abortion ban,” said Dan Pochoda, legal director of the ACLU of Arizona. “Instead of passing unconstitutional laws and blocking women’s access to critical health services, our legislators should be working to ensure that all women get the care they need to have healthy pregnancies and protect their families.”

For further information, please see:

ACLU — Isaacson v. Horne Complaint — 12 July 2012

MSNBC — Rights groups file suit challenging Arizona abortion ban — 12 July 2012

ACLU — Women’s Health Groups File Lawsuit Challenging Arizona Abortion Ban — 12 July 2012

CNN — Judge lets Mississippi’s only abortion clinic stay open – for now — 11 July 2012

Mayo Clinic website — Pregnancy week by week — 23 July 2011

Report Accuses Mexico of Not Protecting Women from Increased Violence and Discrimination

By Mark O’Brien
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

MEXICO CITY, Mexico — A new report released Wednesday said Mexico is not doing enough to protect women despite increasing levels of violence and discrimination.

A protester holds a sign calling for an end to violence against women during an Amnesty International rally on Nov. 24, 2005, in Mexico City. (Photo Courtesy of GlobalPost)

Human rights group Amnesty International issued the report to a United Nations committee, highlighting the rising number of crimes against women and the low success rate of Mexican authorities to convict offenders.

“The state of women’s rights in Mexico is alarming,” said Rupert Knox, a researcher at AI.  “In the past years, Mexico has approved a number of laws and institutions designed to protect women from discrimination and violence.  Much of the problem, however, lies in the lack of effective implementation of these laws and the weaknesses of the institutions.”

The report said Mexican police solve about one of every 21 rapes.  It also accused the police of having flawed procedures for documenting murders of women, including the failure of carrying out proper autopsies in many cases.

According to the report, U.N. figures show there were more than 34,000 women murdered in Mexico between 1985 and 2009.  In 2010 alone, 2,418 women were murdered, the report said.  That averaged to nearly seven murders per day.

One area that has seen a sharp increase in murders of women is the state of Chihuahua, the report said.  In 2010, one of every 11 victims was a woman, compared to one of every 14 in 2008.  Through June, there were more than 130 killings of women in Chihuahua alone.

Mexican prosecutors received nearly 15,000 complaints of rape in 2009, although AI estimates the number actually reached 74,000 since a small percentage of rapes are reported.  Of the cases prosecuted, AI said only 2,795 ended with a conviction.

“The poor quality investigations by Mexico state prosecutors also undermined the outcome of judicial proceedings, ensuring acquittals and decisions not to prosecute,” the report alleged.

To prove that point, AI referenced a 2006 case when Mexican police allegedly sexually abused 26 women arrested during protests in the town of San Salvador.  Several police officers were charged in the incident, but all were acquitted for a lack of evidence.  Nine of the women have now taken their cases to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

AI is calling on both outgoing President Felipe Calderón and President-elect Enrique Peña Nieto to do more to stem the violence against women.

“The Mexican authorities, led by both the actual and new government to take office in December, must move to implement commitments to protect women’s rights to end abuses and impunity,” Knox said.

For further information, please see:

GlobalPost — Amnesty International: Mexico Failing to Protect Women from Violence, Discrimination — 12 July 2012

Latin American Herald Tribune — AI Criticizes Impunity for Violence Against Women in Mexico — 12 July 2012

Amnesty International — Mexico Fails to Tackle Increased Levels of Violence Against Women — 11 July 2012

Chicago Tribune — Report Chides Female Violence in State of Mexico’s President-Elect — 11 July 2012

American Red Cross Chapter Holds War Simulation “Raid Cross” to Educate Youth

By Eric C. Sigmund
Legal Advisor, International Humanitarian Law Dissemination, American Red Cross NHQ

Washington, DC – On June 25, 2012, the District of Columbia Chapter of the American Red Cross held a war games simulation called Raid Cross to educate children about international humanitarian law.  This body of law, also referred to as the “laws of war” or “laws of armed conflict,” is the body of law which applies during armed conflicts and limits the means and methods of warfare.  The Raid Cross this year consisted of 25 youth volunteers between 13 and 18 years of age.  The interactive event teaches young citizens the importance of preserving human dignity in times of conflict.

Featuring seven different stations, Raid Cross placed youth volunteers in simulated combat situations to provide an experience of some of the hazards that exist in conflict zones.  As the volunteers began the half-day activity they were asked to assume the roles of soldiers or medics in the “Haddarian Army,” or humanitarian aid workers for the Red Cross.

The soldier participants were placed in the position of a commander, forced to make tough choices about whom to target in battle.  Playing the role of medics, youth participants were asked to decide to whom they would provide critical medical assistance after an intense battle.  Those assigned to be humanitarian aid workers attempted to dodge a sniper (armed with a water gun), who indiscriminately shot at volunteers, as they sought to deliver aid to soldiers in distress.  These were just three of the thought- provoking wartime scenarios in which the volunteers participated.  At the end of each station, the participants were debriefed about their performance and the laws of war applicable to each situation.

Raid Cross is one of a number of unique educational tools utilized by the American Red Cross to spread awareness about international humanitarian law.  Under Article 47 of the first Geneva Convention, all nations party to the treaty are required to educate both their military and citizenry about the laws of armed conflict.  Within the United States, the duty of educating the public has been assigned to the American Red Cross.

By the end of the simulation the youth volunteers were familiar with the rules and principals of international humanitarian law.  They had also experienced the task of making difficult decisions quickly that were still in accordance with the laws.  Armed with this knowledge of the law, the volunteers were encouraged to think critically and strategically about the current conflict situations existing around the world and to become more global citizens.  Educating the public through fun and interactive programs, like Raid Cross, the American Red Cross continues its mission to spread awareness about armed conflicts and the need to protect vulnerable populations under the law.

For additional information about this event and other international services contact your local Red Cross chapter or email Eric Sigmund at eric.sigmund@redcross.org.

 

For further information, please see:

Leesburg Today – Teens Hit Paintball Course for Mock Militia Games – June 26, 2012
The Magazine of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement – Raid Cross – Are You Game? – Feb. 26, 2006

As More Refugees Reach Australia, Political Debate Heats Up

By Mark O’Brien
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania

CANBERRA, Australia — For the twenty-fifth time in the last month, another boatload of asylum seekers arrived on Australian soil Saturday hoping to find refuge.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young urges Australia to share the refugee burden with Indonesia or more asylum seekers could be forced to risk their lives. (Photo Courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald)

A total of 32 Sri Lankans, including one girl, were intercepted on their small fishing vessel and taken to Christmas Island.  According to The Australian newspaper, the island has roughly 1,400 asylum seekers in detention facilities.  But the recent surge has the government scrambling to transfer many of them to detention centers on the mainland.

It is also calling into question Australia’s policies on refugees.

“The turn-back-the-boats option is what wee need if we are going to discourage reckless behaviour by people-smugglers and their clients,” said Opposition Leader Tony Abbott in The Australian, affirming his commitment to force asylum-seekers back to Indonesia despite warnings that the policy is dangerous and potentially illegal.

Many in the opposition party blamed Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who they said refused to restore border protection policies.

“Two years ago [Friday], Julia Gillard promised she would break the people smugglers’ business model by building an offshore processing centre on East Timor,” said Scott Morrison, an opposition immigration spokesperson, in a statement.

“Since that time, she has overseen the largest number of illegal boat arrivals under any prime minister, with 206 boats and over 13,600 people arriving on her watch.”

Saturday’s arrival capped a week that saw more than 200 refugees make it to Australia.  On Thursday, the Navy picked up 162 Middle Easterners after they sent a distress signal 50 nautical miles offshore.  On Friday, 38 Iraqis and four Indonesians were transferred to Christmas Island after their asylum boat was intercepted a week earlier.

“[The perception is that] everyday we’re being flooded by boat people who are cheating the system,” said Kon Karapanagiotidis, head of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre in Australia.

“Everyday the news is reporting another boat has arrived and another boat has arrived,” he added.  “It’s feeding this idea that we’re being flooded.”

Karapanagiotidis said that makes it easy to turn asylum seekers into “scapegoats” and a “political football” without any compassion or understanding for why they are refugees in the first place.

A recent report by the United Nations Commissioner for Refugees identified “a time of rising anti-refugee sentiment in many industrialized” countries.  According to the report, European countries on the Mediterranean Sea saw an 87 percent increase in asylum requests in 2011 compared to the previous year, due in large part to the Arab uprisings at that time.  Australia and New Zealand actually saw a nine percent decrease in 2011.

But as more asylum seekers flock to Australia now, some say the only way to stop the rush of refugees is to be more willing to help.

On Friday, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young warned that more people might be forced to risk their lives on boat trips to Christmas Island unless Australia agrees to share more of the regional asylum burden with Indonesia.

“There is a very real concern from those working on the ground,” she told The Saturday Age, “that unless there is a lot of work put into the relationship, Indonesia is going to get tougher on the asylum seekers and refuges who are here and make life even more unbearable for them, which is going to force people onto boats.”

“Unless we deal with that, there’s no way of stopping people from taking that dangerous journey,” she added.

Her comments came after two days of meetings with asylum seekers, non-government bodies, and Indonesian officials, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.  Unlike the government and opposition, the Greens’ prefer a regional approach that would see Australia take more refugees from countries such as Indonesia and Malaysia.

“The ALP and the Coalition accuse the Greens of not understanding this issue and being naive,” she said, “but the real naivety is thinking that pushing people anywhere else but Australia will stop them from coming [here].”

For further information, please see:

The Australian — In One Month, 25 Boats Arrive in Australia — 7 July 2012

The Australian — I Will Still Turn Boats Around, Tony Abbott Says — 7 July 2012

The Sydney Morning Herald — Share Refugee Burden, Green Senator Urges — 7 July 2012

CNN — Which Countries Take in Most Refugees?  Not the West — 5 July 2012

No Prosecution for Haitian Rape Cases

By Stuart Smith
Impunity Watch, North America Desk

PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti- ­The prosecution of rape and sexual assault cases in Haiti remains alarmingly slow, with victims only rarely receiving justice, the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti said in a report released June 26, 2012.

Rose, 22, who was abducted and repeatedly raped in Port-au-Prince last month, bravely discusses her ordeal. (Photo Courtesy of The New York Times)

The report, conducted by the U.N.’s human rights section in Haiti in cooperation with law enforcement and judicial officials, examined 62 rape complaints filed in Port-au-Prince during a three month period in 2010, reported the ABC News. According to the report, more than a year after they were filed with police, none of the 62 complaints had gone to trial. As of December 2011, only one of the 62 rape complaints had been recommended for trial by judicial authorities, although the trial had not yet begun.

Yet, the lack of prosecution is not the only problem- so, too, is the lack of information and resources.

According to ABC News, obtaining accurate and comprehensive information on rape and sexual assault cases is difficult because there is no national database pooling data from the government, aid groups, and the U.N. Further, in part due to the 2010 earthquake, police lack the basic resources, such as computers, vehicles, and furniture, necessary to perform their duties.

Moreover, currently, the government allocates 1.4 percent of the national budget to the Ministry of Women’s Rights. Addressing these issues , the U.N. report recommended, that the government increase the funding dedicated to the ministry and other agencies helping women.

Yet, concern over rape and sexual assault cases in Haiti is not new.

According to an Amnesty International report, more than 250 rape cases were reported in the 150 days following the 2010 earthquake. A year after the earthquake, detailed the report, rape victims continued to arrive at local women’s support groups almost every other day.

“Women, already struggling to come to terms with losing their loved ones, homes and livelihoods in the earthquake, now face the additional trauma of living under the constant threat of sexual attack,” said Gerardo Ducos, Amnesty International’s Haiti researcher.

Further exacerbating the problem are allegations of rape against U.N. peacekeepers. In May 2010, a 19-year-old Haitian man accused six Uruguayan soldiers, serving as UN peacekeepers in Haiti, of raping him, reported Al Jazeera. And on March 14, 2012, a Pakistani military tribunal convicted three peacekeepers of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy, sentencing them to one year in jail, said an Amnesty International press release.

“For the prevalence of sexual violence to end, the government must ensure that the protection of women and girls in the camps is a priority. This has so far been largely ignored in the response to the wider humanitarian crisis,” said Ducos.

Unfortunately, the sexual violence continues today, and the government response remains woefully inadequate to combat this crisis.

For further information, please see:

ABC News — UN Report on Haiti Rape Shows Few Prosecutions — 27 June 2012

Al Jazeera — Haiti ‘rape victim’ set for court testimony — 10 May 2012

Amnesty International — Convictions against UN peacekeepers in Haiti do not serve justice — 15 March 2012

Amnesty International — Haiti: Sexual violence against women increasing — 6 January 2011