by Stuart Smith
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania

JAKARTA, Indonesia — On May 21, 2012,  a crowd of local Muslims and police surrounded members of the Congregation of Batak Protestant Churches Filadelfia parish, a Lutheran congregation based in Bekasi, Indonesia, just outside Jakarta, preventing them from attending Sunday worship, according to NPR. The congregation was headed to pray in an empty lot because they had been barred from building a church there by the local mayor’s “zero church” policy. It was the second confrontation in less than a week on the congregation by local Muslims, reported the Jakarta Post.

Displaying signs stating that Muslims are prepared to wage Jihad against the congregation, the crowd demanded the congregation return to their homes. According to local Muslim resident Irwan Taufik, the Christians are responsible for the confrontation. “The Christians,” he said, “should have gathered the community leaders and clerics together and asked us, ‘Can we worship and build a church here?’ But if in fact the people are not willing and reject the request, then why must they insist?”

Yet, the congregation refused to be deterred and as tensions mounted, truckloads of riot police arrived, but did not separate the Christians and Muslims. Reverend Palti Panjaitan, leader of the Filadelfia congregation, stated, “If my brothers are the killing type, then I am ready to be killed. That’s it! Tell the police I am ready to be killed right here. If it’s a riot you’re worried about, then arrest the rioters, not me.”

Finally, only after police informed the congregation that their safety can no longer be guaranteed were the Christians forced to return home.

The confrontation, Panjaitan believes, was the result of efforts by the militant Islamic Defenders Front, which, police records indicate, was involved in 34 instances of violence and destruction in the past two years, to incite conflict between the local Muslims and Christians. The previous week, bowing to pressure from the Front, authorities denied Lady Gaga a permit to perform in Jakarta.

According to the Jakarta Globe, the increasing religious intolerance by hardline Islamist throughout Indonesia, and especially in Bekasi, is deeply troubling to human rights groups, including the Asian Human Rights Commission. “There’s now a religious intolerance case almost every day in Indonesia,” said Bonar Naipospos, a Setara Institute researcher, in an interview with BBC News. “There’s been a marked increase in cases over the last decade. The government doesn’t do anything about it because it is worried about losing the Muslim vote. Even though the majority of Indonesian Muslims are moderate- they are the silent majority. If we don’t fix this we could go from being a moderate country to one dominated by extremists.”

Panjaitan agreed. “The majority of the Muslims here are tolerant, but they are easily influenced by the intolerant,” he said. “Actually, tolerant people in Indonesia are in the majority, but they are passive. I wish they would be more active and say ‘no’ to the intolerance which is now increasing in Bekasi.”

However, for now, the Filadelfia congregation holds their Sunday worship, complete with prayer, singing and protesting, in downtown Jakarta, right across the street from the presidential palace.

For further information, please visit:

BBC News — Is Indonesia Becoming Less Tolerant? —  28 May 2012

Asian Human Rights Commission — INDONESIA: Judgement by the Supreme Court upholding freedom of religion disregarded by police and Bekasi local authorities —  25 May 2012

NPR — Hard-Line Muslims Test Indonesia’s Tolerance — 24 May 2012

Jakarta Globe — Human Rights Group Calls on Bekasi District Chief to Protect Filadelfia Church —  21 May 2012

Jakarta Post — HKBP Filadelfia church congregation harassed- again — 21 May 2012

By Brittney Hodnik
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

GUANTANAMO BAY, U.S. Naval Base – On May 5, a routine arraignment turned into a daylong spectacle.  Five men, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed refused to cooperate at the arraignment by refusing to answer even fundamental questions.  The protest is a sign of things to come for future hearings.

The arraignment was supposed to be a simple reading of charges, appointment of counsel and entry of pleas.  According to The Wall Street Journal, it turned into a 13-hour “spectacle of disruptions.”  The defendants’ attorneys argued that the military commission trial was unconstitutional.  Some believe that this rocky start will further divide opposing sides on whether a tribunal on a faraway Caribbean island is the appropriate place for justice, reported The LA Times.

The five men, now known as the “Gitmo 5” shifted from disgust to boredom throughout the proceedings, according to The LA Times.  The day started with defendant Walid bin Attash being carried into the room with restraints because he refused to come on his own.  He was eventually freed from the restraints after promising to behave.

One of the men pretended he was reading an English law book; some of the men knelt and bowed in quiet prayer.  All five men refused to wear the headphones that translated the judge’s questions from English to Arabic, according to The National Post.  Eventually, a translator came in and translated the questions for the whole room to hear.

Finally, three hours into the hearing, detainee Ramzi Binalshibh waved his finger at the judge and protested: “It’s about the treatment we have received at the camps.  You want to kill us,” reports The LA Times.

The judge overseeing the hearing, Army Colonel James Pohl, refused to stop the arraignment and insisted the proceedings continue.  He later said that even if Mohammed had a perfect reason to refuse cooperation and everyone agreed it was reasonable, he would move forward with the trial anyway.

Mohammed’s civilian attorney, David Nevin told The LA Times, “I can’t force Mr. Mohammed to cooperate or not.”  He said that Mohammed would not cooperate because of past torture (water boarding) at a CIA “black” site.  Walid bin Attash’s civilian attorney, Cheryl Borman insisted that the treatment of her client at Guantanamo Bay had interfered with his ability to participate in the proceedings.

The men could all face the death penalty, according to The National Post, for their involvement in the September 11 attacks that killed 2,976 people in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania.

This was the men’s first appearance since Jan. 21, 2009 a day after President Obama’s inauguration, according to The Star Telegram.  Four years ago, Mohammed tried to plead guilty, saying, “This is what I wish – to be martyred.”  The trial is set to start a year from now, moving it into President Obama’s last term, or onto Republican hopeful Mitt Romney’s lap, reported The Wall Street Journal.  The next hearing is scheduled for June 12.

For more information, please visit:

The Star-Telegram — 5 Terror Suspects Refuse to Cooperate During Arraignment — 6 May 2012

The Wall Street Journal — Chaos at Sept. 11 Hearing Suggests Long Road for Case — 6 May 2012

National Post — Accused 9/11 Plotters Refuse to  Cooperate at Arraignment, Citing ‘Torture’ Complaints — 5 May 2012

The LA Times — 9/11 Trial Begins at Guantanamo — 5 May 2012