South America

‘Week of Indignation’ Nationwide Protests in Colombia

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BOGOTÁ, Colombia – The ‘week of indignation’ is a movement, organized through social media, of various socially conscious groups to raise government awareness of how the armed conflicts have affected them and demand an active role in the upcoming peace talks.

Flyer promoting the ‘week of indignation’ where groups organized marches and protests throughout Colombia. (Photo Courtesy Estudiantes U de A)

Social organizations of Colombians have publicly supported the peace talks between the government and the Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC) that are set to begin in Olso, Norway next week.  However, some of these groups are not content to sit idly by and allow the government to handle the negotiations; they are demanding their voices be heard.

According to groups such as Marcha Patriotica (Patriotic March), Congreso de los Pueblos, and Coalition of Social Movements and Organizations of Colombia (COMOSOC) the political and economic nature of the dialogues affects them directly and therefore they want a place at the table.

Among the many blogs who have promoted the demonstrations, the students of the University of Antioquia present the reasons to participate in this march and other activities as part of the week of indignation. They point out, among other reasons:

“The gradual deterioration of quality of life and the systematic loss of rights, guarantees and democratic freedoms are fundamental reasons to show our rejection and indignation against neoliberal policies and globalization implemented by imperialism, the Colombian ruling classes and the regime of [President] Juan Manuel Santos.

Outrage for the killing, displacement, threat and intimidation of union, social, indigenous and popular leaders. Also the criminalization of people who think differently and don’t agree with imposed policies.”

The marches and protests started on Monday October 4, 2012, and have affected 25 of Colombia’s 32 departments.

Today marches organized by left-wing movement the Patriotic March and other social sectors will take place simultaneously around the country.  In Bogotá 116 popular organizations will congregate in different parts of the city and intend to converge in the capital city’s central Plaza Bolivar.

“The government has not heard the cry of social organizations … the government has refused these social and popular organizations a presence at the round table … where will civil society be represented?” said Carlos Lozano, spokesperson for the left-wing Patriotic March movement.

Across the internet there are postings by various groups promoting the week of indignation.  Links to several of these postings are provided below.

For further information, please see:

Colombia Reports – Colombia marches for ‘week of indignation’ – 12 October 2012

Global Voices – Colombia to Close ‘Week of Indignation’ With Nationwide Protests – 11 October 2012

Facebook – PROGRAMACION DE LA MOVILIZACION EN CALI ESTE VIERNES 12 DE OCTUBRE; SEMANA DE LA INDIGNACION – Last Updated10 October 2012

Facebook – Operation Colombia – ¿A ti que te indigna? – Last Updated 08 October 2012

YouTube – Semana de la indignacion Cali – 03 October 2012

Estudiantes U. de A. – Cronograma Semana de la Indignación 4-12 Octubre 2012 – 1 October 2012

Brazilian Government Requires All Cars Have Tracking Chips

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BRASÍLIA, Brazil – A new law has been passed in Brazil requiring radio frequency ID tags to be placed in every Brazilian car, new and on the road.

Cars in Brazil to be tracked. (Photo courtesy of Time)

The radio ID tags are to be placed in car windshields and antenna in order to broadcast a variety of information including the “vehicle year or fabrication, make, model, combustible, engine power and license plate number.”

Checkpoints will be placed throughout the country to immediately track all automobiles in the nation, including their entrance and exit from the country. These checkpoints are expected to improve safety in cargo haulers, toll roads and other road based infrastructure. Administrators hope that in the future the chips will be used to  automatically open gates and pay highway tolls.

While citizens are probably appreciative of the security aspects – stolen cars will be able to be tracked to nearby checkpoints and automatically notify police. The fact that the government will be able to place a citizen’s car anywhere in the nation is worrying.  Many consider this to be an unparalleled breach of privacy, and the possibility of misuse is staggering.

Known as the “National System for Automatic Vehicle Identification” (Siniav), this Federal Resolution as administered by the National traffic Department requires that the system will be compulsory for all citizens by the 1st of January 2013. The implementation is scheduled to be completed by June 30, 2014. This required installation will cost all car owners approximately $5 for installation, while all new cars will have them pre-installed.

Officially the Siniav will allow for instant identification and location of fixed or mobile vehicles. This surveillance will be able to track the car throughout the country.

The quick identification of vehicles is worrying to some individuals. While the Brazilian government claims that the system will be confidential and secure, disclosure through a third party system does not alleviate suspicious. Despite the fact that all contractors involved with the program are required to sign confidentiality agreements, many believe it to be an unreasonable invasion of privacy. Some agencies believe that the increased security measures are a justifiable governmental interest and these electronic tracers are reasonable method for tracking automobiles.

The Order of Lawyers of Brazil, believe that knowing the exact location of the vehicle and its owner would be a violation of their constitutional right to privacy and the security of its citizens. All this confidential information must be held securely; and they find that that knowledge about vehicle ownership held by a contractor is contrary to public safety.

 

For further information, please see:

Zero Hora – Vehicles Need To Have Electronic Monitoring Until 2014 – 8 October 2012

BoingBoing – Brazil To Roll Out National Radio-Chip ID/Surveillance/Logging For All Vehicles – 6 October 2012

Brasilia Em Tempo Real – SINIAV Become Operational In January 2013 – 3 October 2012

Diario de Pernambuco – Vehicle Identification System Divides Expert Opinion – 3 October 2012

Segs – Operation of Siniav Will Be From January 2013 – 3 October 2012

 

Peruvian Terrorists Attack Private Airstrip

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

LIMA, Peru – Shining Path, making good on their threat to disrupt the flow of natural gas, have carried out an attack in the central region of Cusco that may threaten the nations gas production.

helicopter burnt down in a rebel attack in Peru
Destroyed Helicopter used to transfer gas personnel. (Photo Courtesy of the BBC)

Early Saturday morning, members of The Communist Party of Peru, more commonly known as the terrorist organization The Shining Path executed a daring raid on a private companies infrastructure and heli-transportation. Members axed through metal barriers and made their way directly to the airfield. Using crude explosive charges, the terrorists destroyed three helicopters, and a security control room before disappearing into the jungle.

These helicopters were used to transfer staff of “Transportadora de Gas del Peru,” (TGP) which monitors and operates the pipeline through Peru.

The attack seems to have had the desired effect as security personnel ran from the explosions terrified. Due to this destruction the TGP has announced that it has suspended all maintenance work on the pipeline until security can be reestablished.

Terrorist leader Martin Quispe Palomino took credit for the attack and announced that this was a reprisal for the companies’ refusal to pay “quotas” for working in the Cusco jungle.

While there have been reports that Shining Path has been severely weakened and a shell of its former 1980s self, their sudden surge of activity is giving the Peruvian military and government pause.  Despite the death of one of their leaders a few weeks ago, the Shining Path shows no signs of slowing down. As evident by this recent attack, and the kidnapping of dozens of gas workers in April, the organization seems to have branched out from merely ambushing and attacking the Peruvian army.

The US has remarked that the drug trade being pushed and pursued by the Shining Path are a detriment to Peruvian society and have offered any sort of assistance to the Peruvian government in their anti-terrorist crusade. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in a recent trip emphasized the need to work together on the issues of terrorism and drug trafficking. That the illegal drug business being conducted in the Peruvian valley has a detrimental effect on every country in the hemisphere. Leon Panetta reiterated his promise for the US to assist in protecting the inner security of the country.

It is unclear exactly what this damage will cause to the natural gas requirements and expectations of the Peruvian government, but what is known is this conflict is far from over.

 

For further information, please see:

La Republica – Helicopters Destroyed Three Businesses Operating in Camisea – 7 October 2012

La Republica – U.S. Reiterates That Drug Trafficking Is A Threat To Peru – 7 October 2012

The BBC – Peru Rebels Burn Helicopters At Jungle Airfield – 6 October 2012

The BBC – Peru Shining Path Rebel Comrade Williams Killed – 5 September 2012

Battle Free Speech: Brazil v Google

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BRASÍLIA, Brazil – As a young, vibrant, democratic nation, it seems counterintuitive that Brazil would be a leader in digital censorship.  Brazil submitted 418 requests, more than any other country, to block or remove content from Google’s various servers last year.

Brazil, which led the world in requests to block Google content, struggles with technology and free-speech rights. (Photo Courtesy Google)

Attempts to censor content were elevated to another level last week when a judge ordered the arrest of Google’s most senior executive in Brazil, Fabio Jose Silva Coelho, after the company failed to take down YouTube videos attacking a local mayoral candidate.

A different Brazilian judge ordered Google to remove versions of the “Innocence of the Muslims” video that has sparked deadly riots across the Middle East from Brazilian YouTube within 10 days or face fines.

The cases are reviving a debate about Brazilian laws that hold services such as YouTube responsible for the videos posted on them, making the country a hotbed of attempts to stifle digital content.

Brazilian law currently treats content on the internet like material in newspapers, television and radio.  Consequently, Google is considered responsible for user posted material.

Brazil carefully monitors racial issues and has strict electoral laws that limit criticism of candidates in the run-up to elections.  There are lawsuits in at least 20 of its 26 states seeking deletion of Google content.  The video that drew controversy last week aired paternity claims against a mayoral candidate in Campo Grande, a state capital in Brazil’s interior.

Google says it resists restrictions it regards as illegitimate but complies with lawful requests from government officials.  The company appealed the ruling in the Campo Grande case but blocked the video after the court rejected the appeal and police arrested Coelho.

“Our goal with YouTube is to offer a community that everyone can enjoy and, at the same time, is a platform for freedom of expression worldwide,” Coelho said in a blog post after his brief detention.  “This is a great challenge, mainly because content acceptable in one country may be offensive — or even illegal — in others.”

Many Brazilians criticized the government’s handling of the Campo Grande case and what they see as elevating the rights of political candidates over the free-speech rights of their constituents.

“It’s a step back in terms of freedom of expression, something like we see happening in countries like China,” said Monica Rosina, professor at Fundaçao Getulio Vargas Law School. “It’s bad for the Brazilian image abroad.”

In the video case, the judge said Google would be fined 10,000 Brazilian reais ($4,926) per day if it doesn’t comply with his order.  Still, the judge acknowledged the complexity of policing videos on YouTube.

There is pending legislation in Brazil that would provide some protection for intermediaries such as Google.  The legislation, known as Marco Civil, would not fully prevent the kind of case that resulted in Coelho’s arrest, which was brought under Brazil’s more specific electoral laws.

Maria Clara Garcaz, a 20-year-old university student in Rio de Janeiro, expressed worries about the court action.

“It’s like we live in a silent, disguised dictatorship.  When we had our real dictatorship, at least you knew for certain what you could and couldn’t say,” Garcaz said.  “Political speech can be censored at any time and it’s moving into the Internet, exactly where people speak out.”

For further information, please see:

The Independent – Governments in young democracies fret over social media – 4 October 2012

PKKH – Google’s Brazil Chief Detained; Court Bans Anti-Islam Video – 27 September 2012

Yahoo Finance – Arrest of Google Brazil head stirs debate over Web – 27 September 2012

The Guardian – Google executive in Brazil faces arrest over video – 25 September 2012

 

Big Win for Indigenous Rights in Peru’s Top Court

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

 LIMA, Peru – Peru’s highest court, the Constitutional Tribunal, has ruled that an Amazonian indigenous community could limit outsiders’ access to its territory and upheld the principle of communal autonomy.  The Tribunal also ordered lower courts to void the convictions of four indigenous community leaders who had been jailed during their struggle against illegal loggers, miners, and transportation workers.

A sign put up by the indigenous community at Tres Islas warns motorists that the land is private property. (Photo Courtesy Indian Country)

“We’ve had to move heaven and earth to defend our territory, but we have won,” Esperanza Gonzales, one of the leaders facing a prison term, said at a press conference in Lima.

The Shipibo and Ese’eja community of Tres Islas, located in the southeastern region of Madre de Dios has been battling destructive trespassers for years.  Illegal miners, loggers and transportation companies have stripped portions of the land and polluted water sources.

When the community put up a gate across a road and posted a guard from the community, two of the transportation companies that served illegal miners brought suit against the community on the grounds that the gate violated the companies’ freedom of movement.

An initial court ruling in favor of the companies was upheld on appeal, and was ultimately supported by the Superior Court of Madre de Dios, which in September 2010 sentenced four community leaders to six years in prison and fines of about $2,500 each.

The Constitutional Tribunal, based its decision to overturn the lower courts’ rulings on principles from the Peruvian Constitution, International Labor Organization Convention 169 on the rights of tribal and Indigenous Peoples, jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Although “freedom of movement is a fundamental right, it is subject to certain constraints, such as not invading other people’s land without the owners’ consent,” the decision stated.

The case marks the first time that a Peruvian court has ruled that an indigenous community has a right not only to private property, like any citizen, but also to self-determination within its territory, as long as the aim is not secession from the country.

Although this decision is seen as big win for indigenous rights, advocates caution that there is still much progress to be made.

The ruling only guarantees indigenous communities autonomy over the surface of their land.  Sub-surface resources are still owned by the government, which can grant access to companies wishing to exploit them.

A key provision of Convention 169, which Peru ratified in 1994, is reflected in a new law that would require the government to consult with indigenous communities about any development project that would affect their territories.  The law has not yet been implemented, but the first of such consultations is expected to be held in early 2013.

For further information, please see:

Indian Country – Peru’s Constitutional Tribunal Rules in Favor of Indigenous Community – 2 October 2012

Upside Down World – Peru: Amazon Indians Win Court Case over Land Rights – 28 September 2012

Chicago Times Tribune – Peru top court puts tribal sovereignty ahead of mining, logging – 26 September 2012

Eurasia Review – Peru: Distance Between Government And Indigenous Communities Grows – 26 September 2012

International Labour Organization – Convention No. 169