South America

Reports of (Another) Massacre of Yanomami Indians by Brazilian Gold Miners

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

 CARACAS, Venezuela – Dozens of members of the Yanomami indigenous group were reportedly massacred back in July, according to a document released on Wednesday by various indigenous rights organizations. Reports of the incident are only now reaching Venezuelan authorities due to the remoteness of the indigenous villages.  The killing may be the latest tragedy in a pattern of vicious encounters between Yanomami and Brazilian gold miners.

Survivors of 1993 Haximu massacre hold urns containing the ashes of their relatives. Gold miners reportedly killed 16 Yanomami in the attack. (Photo courtesy Survival International)

Residents of the Hokomawe village said they discovered charred bodies and the torched “shabono” or communal house during a visit to the indigenous community of Irotatheri in early July.  Of the approximately eighty residents of Irotatheri, only three survivors were discovered hiding in the forest.

The survivors reported that they had been out hunting at the time of the attack, which they blamed on miners from nearby Brazil. The hunters said they heard gunshots, explosions and the sound of a helicopter, which miners sometimes use to ferry supplies.

According to the survivors’ account, the miners attacked because some in the community had been “rescuing Yanomami women” from miners.

The Yanomami have often had to contend with Brazilian gold miners, known in Portuguese as garimpeiros, who for years have crossed into Venezuela and torn up the forest, leaving pits of water laced with mercury.

In 1993, activists say, 16 people were killed by Brazilian miners in a Yanomami community in the area of Haximu.  In 2010, Venezuelan authorities said four people in an indigenous community died after drinking water contaminated by miners.

The Yanomami are one of the largest isolated indigenous groups in the Amazon, with a population estimated at roughly 30,000 on both sides of the Venezuela-Brazil border.  They have maintained their language as well as traditions that include face paint and wooden facial ornaments piercing their noses, cheeks and lips.

The isolation of the Yanomami caused the delay in reporting.  The account of villagers from Hokomawe who saw the victims’ remains and talked with the three survivors was later relayed to others in the village of Momoi after days of walking through the forest.  Others then took the news to the larger community of Parima.

The site where the attack is alleged to have happened, in the Venezuelan municipality of Alto Orinoco, near the Brazilian border, is a five-hour helicopter ride, or 15 days on foot, from Puerto Ayacucho, the main Venezuelan city in the Amazon.

Prosecutors were appointed to investigate after leaders of the Yanomami organisation Horonami alerted them to the account, Venezuela’s Public Ministry said in a statement Wednesday.

As of Friday, no headway had been made in the investigation.

Brazil’s Foreign Ministry said on Friday its embassy in Caracas had asked the Venezuelan government to provide it with any information that could help it determine whether the attack had happened and whether Brazilians had been involved.

Brazil’s National Indian Foundation, a government body that oversees indigenous affairs, said it would seek a joint investigation by officials from both countries at the site.

Venezuelan Interior Minister Tareck Al Aissami said in televised comments on Friday that officials had managed to speak with seven of the nine known groups of the Yanomami tribe and thus far had no proof of an attack in any of their settlements.

There has been an outcry from native rights groups across the globe.

Stephen Corry, Director of Survival International said, “This is another appalling tragedy for the Yanomami – heaping crime upon crime. All Amazonian governments must stop the rampant illegal mining, logging and settlement in indigenous territories. It inevitably leads to massacres of Indian men, women and children. The Venezuelan authorities must now bring the killers to swift justice, and send a signal throughout the region that Indians can no longer be killed with impunity. The mining and logging must be stopped.”

The Yanomami have complained of increasing encroachment by the miners.

“The presence of garimpeiros in this area has been documented since at least four years ago, and complaints have been made various times,” said Aime Tillett, an activist with the indigenous rights organization Wataniba in Caracas. “What we’re asking is for the government to take sufficient measures to control the garimpeiros.”

Though the exact death toll is unknown, Linda Manaka, a representative of the Venezuelan Association of Indigenous People in Puerto Ayacucho, said that based on the account she believes dozens died.

“Generally a ‘shabono’ is made up of dozens of people,” she said. “At least there are about four, five dozen people.”

For further information, please see:

The Guardian – Brazil asks Venezuela to investigate village massacre claims – 1 September 2012

Chicago Tribune – Brazil presses Venezuela on alleged Amazon massacre – 31 August 2012

CNN – Venezuela to investigate reports of massacre of Indians by gold miners – 30 August 2012

Fox News – Indigenous Amazon Reports Massacre in Venezuela – 30 August 2012

Survival International – Yanomami Indians ‘massacred’ by goldminers in Venezuela – 29 August 2012

 

Sixteen Lions and Tigers Stopped at Paraguay-Argentine Border

By Heba Girgis
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

ASUNCION, Paraguay—We all know what it is like to be stuck in the security line at the airport for an hour anxiously wondering if we will make our flight departure, or wondering if just because we possess certain traits we will be held up at customs. Now take this situation and multiply it by two months of waiting.

The Cats Have Been Held in Paraguay for Almost Two Months at the Zoo in Asuncion. (Photo Courtesy of The Cortez Journal)

This is the situation that 16 lions and tigers face on the border of Paraguay because Argentine officials refused to approve the big cats’ paperwork for re-entry into the country.

The group of cats includes nine Bengal tigers and seven African lions. They all belong to an Argentine circus that travels to the capital of Paraguay every August to perform. The group’s owner, Oswal Wasconi, travelled with them to this year’s performance and ran into trouble when the group attempted to return to Argentina. Apparently a new law was passed in Paraguay banning live animal acts in performing circuses.

After realizing that they had no choice of putting on the live animal show, Wasconi decided to try to ship the lions and tigers back to Argentina. It was at this point in the game that these animals got stuck at the customs border between Argentina and Paraguay. While the animals all have good-health forms and certificates, their entry back into Argentina was blocked by government border officials who demanded more information about the protected species of cats.

Estela Gomez, the director of Paraguay’s wildlife agency, noted that her ministry decided to move the performing cats to the Asuncion Zoo in pairs “so that they can live in some comfort and not in a strange area” until the issue with the border patrol is resolved. The cats’ owner will be providing the zoo with enough food and water to care for the cats while this matter is investigated further.

Gomez said also that, “In the next few days we will continue investigating the true reasons why the Argentine authorities aren’t authorizing their return. I can’t anticipate whether these beasts will remain forever in Paraguay or eventually go to Argentina.”

Paraguay is not the only country to develop this type of ban on live animal acts. Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador have also passed a similar law and the legislation process is under way in both Colombia and Brazil to develop their own laws of this nature.

As Wasconi awaits the news from Argentine border officials, his animals await the verdict in the Asuncion Zoo in Paraguay’s capital city.

 

For further information, please see:

Global Post – 16 Tigers and Lions Stuck in South American Border Limbo for 2 Months – 25 August 2012

Cortez Journal – Caged Big Cats Stuck on Paraguay Border 2 Months – 24 August 2012

Newsday – Caged Big Cats Stuck on Paraguay Border 2 Months – 24 August 2012

The Washington Post – 16 Tigers and Lions Caged in Two Month Border Limbo; Banned in Paraguay, Barred From Argentina – 24 August 2012

Angry Mob Lynches Brazilian Prisoners in Bolivia

By Heba Girgis
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

SUCRE, Bolivia—A rebel mob in the town of San Matias, Bolivia dragged two Brazilian murder suspects from the Bolivian jail, beat them and burned them alive. Allegedly, the Brazilians had shot to death three Bolivians and wounded two others in a drunken dispute in Tuesday, August 14. The reason for the dispute still remains unclear.

The Town of San Matias Lies on the Border of Bolivia and Brazil and is Occupied by Many Drug Traffickers and Car Thieves. (Photo Courtesy of BBC News)

The seven police officers who were responsible for keeping the Brazilians in custody were completely overwhelmed by the mob that attacked the prison and were unable to control the situation. They fired several shots into the air with no avail.

The two bodies of the Brazilian prisoners were delivered to Brazilian police late Tuesday night. Col. Lily Cortez, Bolivia’s regional police commander has vowed to arrest and prosecute the members of the mob responsible for the deaths. As of today, no one has been arrested.

The lynching of the alleged criminals occurred in the town of San Matias, a town located on the border of Bolivia and Brazil with an active community of drug traffickers and car thieves. Bolivian police officers noted that the town of San Matias has now become a kind of refuge for Brazilian criminals and that violent behavior is not altogether uncommon in this particular part of the country.

In many areas of rural Bolivia, these types of lynchings are common, as law enforcement officers and judicial workers are rare.

Claudio Rojas, the town councilman, told the Associated Press that, “It’s barbarous what occurred Tuesday night, but people are tired of so much insecurity. No one is in charge of this town, where criminals do whatever they please.”

In the past, there have been many instances where innocent individuals have been injured or killed by angry mobs. According to these groups, they wanted nothing more than to simply bring swift justice. While Bolivia’s constitution did legalize “traditional justice,” the Bolivian legislative assembly passed a law in 2010 making it clear that lynching and any form of the death penalty are strictly forbidden.

The Brazilian foreign ministry now voices its deep concerns over the situation and demands that its embassy in La Paz, Bolivia call upon Bolivian authorities to establish new measures to protect prisoners and prevent this kind of incident from occurring again in the future.

The Brazilian ministry has also strongly urged the Bolivian authorities to carry out a “swift and rigorous” investigation into these types of criminal activities.

 

For further information, please see:

BBC News – Bolivia Lynching: Brazil Condemns Deaths in San Matias – 16 August 2012

International Business Times – Mob Justice in Bolivia: Two Brazilian Murder Suspects Burned Alive – 16 August 2012

The Guardian – Bolivian Mob Lynches 2 Brazilian Murder Suspects –  15 August 2012

The Province – Bolivian Mob Drags 2 Brazilian Murder Suspects From Jail in Border Town, Burns Them Alive – 15 August 2012

 

 

 

Ecuador Grants Assange Asylum, Incites Demonstrations

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

 QUITO, Ecuador – Foreign Minister Ricardo Patiño announced Thursday that Ecuador would grant asylum to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.  In the days before the decision demonstrators gathered outside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, as well as, the British embassy in Quito.

Demonstrators step on a British flag during a protest outside the United Kingdom’s embassy in Quito. (Photo courtesy Albany Times Union)

In a televised statement, Patiño said, “the government of Ecuador, true to its tradition of protecting those who seek refuge in its territory, on the premises of diplomatic missions, has decided to grant diplomatic asylum to citizen Assange based on the request he made.”

He added that the government made a fair and objective assessment of the situations described by Mr. Assange, and shares the concern that Assange may be a victim of political persecution.

In advance of the announcement from Quito, supporters of Mr. Assange gathered outside the embassy in London on Thursday, refusing police orders to move across the road until officers bundled three of them into police vans and arrested them.

The minister said his government had taken the decision after the authorities in Britain and the United States had refused to give guarantees that, if Mr. Assange were extradited to Sweden, he would not then be sent on to America to face other charges.

Patiño also said he hoped Britain would permit Mr. Assange to leave the embassy in London for Ecuador — a guarantee Britain has refused to give, saying it has a legal obligation to extradite Mr. Assange to Sweden, where is wanted to face questioning about allegations of sexual misbehavior.

President Rafael Correa, in his Twitter account, MashiRafael said “right now, Foreign Minister, Ricardo (Patiño) will announce a formal decision on the case in Ecuador concerning Assange. Nobody is going to scare us!”

Ecuador accused Britain on Wednesday of threatening to storm its London embassy to arrest Julian Assange after the U.K. issued a stern warning to the South American nation ahead of its decision on an asylum bid by the WikiLeaks founder, inciting demonstrations outside the British embassy in Quito.

In a televised address Wednesday, Patiño said that the Ecuadorian government had received a written notice from British authorities that they would “assault” the country’s embassy in London if Ecuadoran authorities failed to hand over Assange to British authorities.

“We are not a British colony,” he said. “Those times are passed.”

Analyst and professor at the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences, Julio Echeverria, told The Associated Press that, “Ecuador has a completely unpredictable foreign policy and does not reflect an institutional maturity with regard to respect for principles, rights, procedures and internationally accepted standards.”

“Ecuador’s position means a breakdown of a relationship with both England and Sweden, because it assumes that justice is conducted under Swedish political criteria, which is unacceptable, as is the assumption that the justice of these countries would be conducted under pressure from a third country like the United States, which is also inconceivable,” Echeverria said.

For more information, please see:

Albany Times Union – Ecuador Grants Political Asylum to Assange – 16 August 2012

CNN – Ecuador Grants Asylum to WikiLeaks’ Assange – 16 August 2012

The New York Times – Ecuador Grants Asylum to WikiLeaks Founder – 16 August 2012

El Universal – Ecuador anuncia decisión de otorgarle asilo a Julian Assange – 16 August 2012

USA Today – Ecuador Grants Political Asylum to WikiLeaks’ Assange – 16 August 2012

 

Ecuador to Rule on Asylum Request of Alleged Rapist and WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

QUITO, Ecuador – Ecuador has announced that it will make a decision on the asylum request of infamous WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, 41, by the end of the week.  Assange has been ensconced at the Ecuadorian embassy in London since June 19, avoiding extradition to Sweden where he will face charges of sexual molestation and rape.

Ecuador’s President wary of United States “secret courts” sentencing Assange to death, will personally decide whether to grant the WikiLeaks founder asylum. (Photo courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald)

Mr Assange has said he fears if he is extradited he may later be sent to the US to face espionage charges, which could carry the death penalty. However, this argument was dismissed by prosecutors at his extradition hearing who said Sweden provided “protection against that sort of threat and violation”. No formal charges have been filed by Washington.

WikiLeaks, which facilitates the anonymous leaking of secret information, has published about 250,000 confidential U.S. diplomatic cables, causing embarrassment to the government and others. It also has published hundreds of thousands of classified U.S. documents relating to the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa shares Assange’s fears, stating in a television interview Monday evening that,

“The process in Sweden needs to be reviewed, you have to consider the possibility of extradition to the United States, if there’s a secret tribunal there, if there’s any risk of a death penalty. It requires a large amount of information, an analysis of international law to make an informed, absolutely responsible and sovereign decision.”

A decision could be made as early as Wednesday.  Correa stated on Monday that the delay in the decision making has been due to the complexity of the case, but earlier reports indicated that Correa was waiting until after the conclusion of the Olympic games in London.

It is not clear how Assange would travel to Ecuador if he is granted asylum. By diplomatic convention, British police cannot enter the embassy without Ecuador’s approval. But he has no way of boarding a plane to Ecuador without passing through London and exposing himself to arrest.

Assange was arrested in Britain in 2010 because Swedish authorities wanted to question him about the sexual molestation and rape allegations, which he denies. His bail conditions included staying every night at the home of a supporter outside London.

British police say he violated his bail by staying at the embassy. After he entered it, they served him with notice to turn himself in — an order he ignored, marking a further violation.

Assange has not indicated why he chose to seek out Ecuador.  He interview Correa back in May, and the two seemed to share a similar outlook.  The interview showed a shared distaste for U.S. foreign policy and big media outlets.

“Cheer up. Welcome to the club of the persecuted,” Correa told Assange at the end of the 25-minute interview.

Ecuadorean Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino confirmed that President Correa would personally determine the outcome of Assange’s application.

”The president will decide … We will have a meeting with the president to give information of what we have done. We have done a lot, we talked with Britain, we talked to Sweden,” Mr Patino told a news conference on Monday.

Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr said yesterday that the Australian government had no interest in Mr Correa’s consideration of Assange’s asylum application.

”That’s a matter between him and Julian Assange,” Senator Carr said.

”I’d just say again – if America were interested in Julian Assange they could have sought his extradition from the UK at any time in the last two years.”

For more information, please see:

 BBC News – Ecuador to make Assange asylum bid decision ‘this week’ – 14 August 2012

The Christian Science Monitor – Ecuador to decide about Assange asylum this week – 14 August 2012

CNN – Decision on WikiLeaks founder’s asylum request coming, Ecuador says – 14 August 2012

The Sydney Morning Herald – Assange awaits Ecuador verdict – 15 August 2012