South America

International Groups Urge Chavez To Stop Anti-Semitic Campaign Against Capriles

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela  — Jewish groups in Venezuela and around the world are urging President Hugo Chavez to stop using anti-Semetic attacks as a political tool against opposition leader Henrique Capriles Radonski. International groups are voicing concerns that Chavez’s campaign for presidency will only become more threatening and offensive as the October elections approach.

Capriles has been slammed with insults coming from the Chavez campaign since winning the Democratic Unity coalition's presidential candidacy. (Photo Courtesy of The Huffington Post).

Last week, the government-run website of Radio Nacional de Venezuela posted a column that highlighted the Jewish ancestry of Capriles; his grandparents were Polish Holocaust survivors. The column labeled Capriles a secret follower of Zionism, which is a Jewish political movement that the column called “the most rotten sentiments represented by humanity.” The column urged Venezuelans to reject “international Zionism” by re-electing Chavez.

Abraham Foxman, the director of the New York-based Anti-Defamation League, believes Chavez’s anti-Semitic remarks are an early attempt to cast Capriles as a “traitorous Jew” who is not worthy of the presidency. “The Venezuelan political campaign has just begun, and this early appearance of government-sanctioned anti-Semitism is a deeply troubling sign of the depths that President Chavez is willing to go to retain his oppressive power,” he said.

In 2008, A U.S. State Department report named Venezuela a country where its leaders and governments “fan the flames of anti-Semitic hatred within their own societies and even beyond their borders.” The report also criticized Venezuela’s government-sponsored mass media for functioning as a medium for anti-Semitism.

Other attacks coming from the Chavez campaign include accusations that Capriles is involved in a group that promotes the “Aryan race” with ties to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, and that he is a pig and part of South America’s bourgeoisie. “You are not going to be able to disguise yourself, even if you look for advisers, masks. Dress yourself up however you dress yourself up. Pig’s tail, pig’s ears, pig’s nose: It’s a pig,” Chavez said.

Capriles, who spent four months in jail in 2004 on charges related to an attempted coup against Chavez, has denied the accusations against him in an interview and said he wants to focus his campaign on talking about the problems that really bother Venezuelans such as crime and unemployment. “They came here and they called me ‘Nazi,’ when my grandmother was in the Warsaw Ghetto,” Capriles told The Forward newspaper in response to the accusations.

Despite the aggressive campaign against him, Capriles is currently believed to be the most popular politician in Venezuela and a strong contender against Chavez, a socialist who has ruled Venezuela for the last 13 years. Chavez and Capriles will face off in October for the Venezuelan presidency.

 

For further information, please see:

International Business Times – Venezuela: Hugo Chavez’ Anti-Semitic Election Campaign – 24 February 2012

Bloomberg Businessweek – Chavez Media Say Rival Capriles Backs Plots From Nazi to Zionist – 21 February 2012

ABC News – Jewish Group: Chavez Foe a Target of Anti-Semitism – 17 February 2011

CNN – Jewish Groups Decry ‘anti-Semitic’ Venezuelan State Media Article – 19 February 2012

 

Deadly Train Crash in Argentina Highlights Concerns for the Public Rail System

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – Yesterday, a packed commuter train, on the Once line, crashed into the end of the train station.  Workers and rescue personnel have spent the last 24 hours freeing those still trapped in the crumpled train.  The death toll from the accident currently sits at 50 people, including 3 children.

Rescue workers extricate a passenger from the crash. (Photo Courtesy of International Business Times)

Close to 600 passengers were injured.  Hospitals in Buenos Aires have been overwhelmed both with working to give aid to those injured and with attempts to reunite family members trying to find loved ones.

Today, in remembrance of the accident, flags across the country were flown at half-mast.  They will fly at half-mast tomorrow as well.  Identification of those who were killed as well as those injured has been slow.  Many have been noted on the lists as “name unknown.”

Mirta Soria, is looking for her 19-year old niece who she believes was on the train.  She thinks that her niece’s wallet was lost in the accident and now she is either in a hospital or morgue.  Soria has been searching throughout the night.  “I am tired, and just have to keep going. I am waiting, and waiting, hoping that she is here,” she said.  A similar sentiment that hundreds of others continue to echo.

Rescue workers had to use vaseline and oil to pull passengers out of the crumpled cars and apart from each other.  As reported by the Boston Globe, it took hours for workers to pull out over a hundred people from one area of the train where they had been compressed into a few square feet of space.

Initial reports indicate that the train’s operator had difficulties with the brakes on the train throughout the morning.  The accident occurred when the train came into the station and was not able to stop.  It slammed into the barrier wall at the end of the line still going at almost 20 miles per hour.

Two cars were essentially folded into each other during the accident.  Passengers recounted that the windows broke and the tops of the train cars separated from the floors.  People were thrown out of their seats and into each other.  The train was extensively overcrowded as it was a rush-hour commuter train.  The Transportation Minister notes that during peak hours each train roughly carries 1200 to 1500 people.

The high death toll makes this the worst train accident in Argentina since February 1 in 1970, when 200 people were killed as two trains collided at full speed.  In the last 2 years there have been five other accidents involving the public transportation system in Argentina.

 

For more information, please see;

Boston Globe – Argentine Train Crash Toll at 50, Hundreds Injured – 23 February 2012

Mail Online – Train Crash in Argentina Kills 49 and Leaves Hundreds More Injured After Brakes Fail at Busy Station – 23 February 2012

Huffington Post – Argentina Train Accident Kills at Least 40, Injures More than 500 – 22 February 2012

BBC Mundo – La Realidad del Sistema Ferroviario de Argentina – 22 February 2012

Ecuadorian Court Enforces $40 Million Punishment in Libel Case Brought by President

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

QUITO, Ecuador – Ecuador’s National Court of Justice, the highest court in the nation, has upheld a ruling in a libel case that restricts the freedom of the press.  On Wednesday, the court sentenced three people from the newspaper El Universo to pay a fine of $40 million to Ecuador’s president, Rafael Correa. 

Correa rips up a copy of the daily newspaper, La Hora, during a conference, to indicate his aggressive stance towards media. (Photo courtesy of Committee to Protect Journalists)

Emilio Palacio, an editor and the writer of the article in question, was fined $30 million.  The owners of the newspaper, Cesar Perez and Nicolas Perez, were fined $10 million.  All three of the men were additionally sentenced to three years imprisonment.

Correa instigated a libel suit against the newspaper El Universo in March of 2011 for an article they printed about him.  In the article, it was insinuated that the Correa had authorized soldiers to shoot on a hospital with innocent civilians inside. 

The article was printed following a police strike in September of 2011.  The police were revolting against a new austerity law that reduced their bonus pay and Correa pushed into the crowd to personally address some of the officers leading the rebellion.  

Media reports from the time state that Correa confronted them by opening his shirt and stating, “If you want to kill the president, here he is.  Kill him, if you want to.  Kill him, if you are brave enough.”  After this, as Correa’s guards escorted him from the area, he was attacked with tear gas and shoved by the protestors.

Correa was taken to a nearby hospital from which he declared a state of emergency.  Rebellious police protestors surrounded the hospital and Correa was trapped inside of it for the next 12 hours.  He was eventually rescued by the military in an operation that left two dead and dozens injured from gunshots.

The article, printed by El Universo, and written by Palacio, called Correa a dictator and referenced the strike as an attempted coup.  It also stated that the President had ordered the military to fire on the hospital regardless of the innocent civilians that would be injured by such a move.  The article stated: 

 “In the future, a new president, maybe an enemy of yours, may bring you to a criminal court for ordering to open fire at discretion and without warning against a hospital full of civilians and innocent people. Do not forget, there is no statute of limitation for crimes against humanity.”

The libel suit was brought as a criminal and not a civil charge.  The trial court found the article to be libelous and imposed the three year imprisonment and $40 million fine from which El Universo appealed.  The decision handed down yesterday to uphold the sentence was final.  Ecuador’s highest court termed any appeal from their decision as “out of order.”

Amnesty International’s Deputy America’s Director, Guadalupe Marengo, says that this case has raised a number of concerns, “this harsh sentence is an attack on the right to free speech for everyone in Ecuador, and will discourage journalists from engaging in legitimate criticism of the government.”

“Libel cases should be dealt with in civil trials and should not involve jail terms. Peaceful criticism of government policies must never be the subject of criminal proceedings, as regional and international human rights bodies have unequivocally stated.”

El Universo and Palacio have made it clear that they will not accept this ruling as they claim they were restricted from making a proper defense and the judge’s selection was manipulated by Correa.

 “Of course this sets a precedent: For the first time in the history of Latin America, and I suppose, the world, a president wins $40 million for his pocket by manipulating justice, naming the judges he desired, and using his influence,” was Palacio’s statement.

The defense will now take the case to an international level, going first to the Interamerican Human Rights Commission and then the Interamerican Human Rights Court.  In the current political climate of Ecuador this is likely the best option, especially with the recent rising concerns over the increased restrictions of the press.

As reported by Aljazeera, shortly after his election in 2007, Correa re-wrote Ecuador’s constitution to lengthen the presidential term and to allow greater government control of the media.  This allowed for the government to take command of a variety of media outlets including TV stations and radio stations.  Fundamedios, an Ecuadorian free media advocacy group, estimates that there have so far been 400 violations of freedom of the press during Correa’s presidency. 

Prior to the court’s announcement, Correa made it clear that he viewed the case as one in which the “corrupt private press” was going to be held accountable for their actions.  Following the decision he announced that, “the truth has shined…We have set a precedent. This sentence and this process are historic. They demonstrate that nobody has the right to tarnish the truth.”

 

For more information, please see;
BBC – Ecuador Court Uphold $40M Rafael Correa Victory – 16 February 2012
Chicago Tribune – Ecuador Top Court Upholds Libel Ruling Against Newspaper – 16 February 2012
CNN – Ecuador High Court Upholds $40 Million Libel Suit – 16 February 2012
France 24 – Libel Case Brings “Ridicule” on Ecuador Says Lawyer – 16 Febraury 2012
The West Australian – Ecuador Leader Wins Libel Suit Against Newspaper – 16 February 2012
Aljazeera – President v. the Media in Ecuador – 1 December 2012
Refworld- Ecuador Court Sentences Journalists to Prison in Presidential Libel Case – 22 July 2011
The Suffolk Journal – Police Uprising in Ecuador Causes Chaos – 20 October 2011

Police Strike Expected to Bring Severe Economic Damage to Brazil in Wake of Carnival

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil  — Over the last week, the murder rate in Salvador has doubled as police officers walked off the job in an organized strike over a week ago. Police all across the country are demanding better pay and benefits as well as a national minimum wage for all uniformed forces. According to the Brazilian Association of Tourism Agencies, at least 10 percent of tourists have already canceled their trips to Rio for Carnival out of fear for their safety.

Police officers go on strike, demanding higher pay. (Photo Courtesy of LA Times).

More than 1000 police officers and firefighters gathered in downtown Rio on Thursday to protest their low wages. The Brazilian government arrested 16 leaders of the strike on Friday and over 100 officers could face summary expulsion for not showing up for patrols.

According to David Fleischer, a political scientists at the University of Brasilia, the government of Rio is coming down with an “iron fist” in order to halt the chaos in Rio before Carnival. “Police in Rio had been doing an excellent job of improving safety in the city, so this is unexpected and extremely embarrassing,” he said.

Although Brazil now has the sixth-largest economy, the recent strike has called into question the country’s ability to put on two of the largest sporting events in the world — the World Cup in 2014 and the Olympic Games in 2016. Safety in most major cities in Brazil has been improving of the last couple years, but crime is still a problem and may be contributed to the low wages and corruption of police officers.

Since the strike began in the metropolitan area of Salvador last week, roughly 150 people have died in Salvador and shopkeepers and tourists officials claim the economic damage is immense. Salvador holds the second largest Carnival festival in Brazil, attracting approximately 500,000 tourists each year. The state tourism secretariat says that tourists contribute about $300 million dollars into local economy each year during Carnival.

According to Jorge Cardeiro, a salesman at the high-end boutique, Projeto Axe Design, Carnival is a crucial time for Brazil’s economy and the police strike may have caused irreversible economic damage. “This place has been so empty it feels like sales are down 100 percent, but really they’ve fallen more than 70 percent. I don’t know how we’re going to make it up,” he said. The U.S. State Department has already issued an advisory warning to Americans against traveling to Salvador.

Although violence in Salvador seems to be cooling down, Intelligence officials are concerned after intercepting a cellphone conversation that revealed a plan by police officials to cause acts violence and vandalism in a strike that would extend to Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. A violent strike in Rio could be more economically damaging than the strike in Salvador, especially during Carnival, where tourists already come concerned about their safety even with the police force working properly.

Military patrols are stepping in to help keep businesses open in Rio as preparations for Carnival street parades continue despite the tension.

 

For further information, please see:

CBS News – Crime Cutting into Brazil’s Carnivals Amid Strike – 11 February 2011

LA Times – Brazil Arrests Strike Leaders to Halt Police Work Stoppage in Rio – 11 February 2012

Reuters  – Brazil Police Strike Spreads to Rio Before Carnival – 10 February 2012

Washington Post – Rio Calm in 2nd Day of Police Strike With Low Adherence Rate – 10 February 2012

The New York Times – Police Strike by Brazilians Makes Holiday Seem a Threat – 09 February 2012

Brazilian Mining Company Vale Wins Dubious Award Highlighting Human Rights and Environmental Abuses

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America 

BRASÍLIA, Brazil – Just recently the annual award for the “worst big company” was given to Brazilian company, Vale.  Close to 89,000 votes were placed online and Vale received just over 25,000 of them.

An advertisement by the Public Eye nominating Vale for the worst company award. (Photo courtesy of Public Eye)

Vale is officially this year’s winner for having the most “contempt for the environment and human rights.”  The undesired award is co-organized by the Swiss nonprofit, the Berne Declaration and Greenpeace Switzerland.  The award is an antagonistic response to the Davos summit hosted each year at this time by the World Economic Forum. 

The Davos coordinators and participants portray themselves as protectors of human rights but those critical of them note that they only represent the “privileged 1%.”  Its members are the 1,000 most profitable and powerful companies globally.

Vale is a mining company and a shareholder in the disputed Belo Monte dam project in Brazil.  As reported by the Public Eye, Vale is the second-largest corporation in Brazil and the second-largest mining corporation internationally as well.  They currently have operations in over 40 countries world-wide.

The company has a long history of abuses.  Reports over the years have cited; terrible working conditions, forced displacement of indigenous people on many of their projects, use of paramilitary leaders to repress indigenous leaders and incalculable environmental damages.  As well, health complications have arisen in the vicinities surrounding Vale’s coal-burning facilities.

The company’s operations in Brazil make up 4% of the carbon emissions in all of the country.  They use 1.2 billion cubic meters of water annually, which is enough to meet the needs of 22,000 people for a one year period.  They also dumped 114 million cubic meters of waste last year.   

The current Belo Monte project they are involved in has garnered media attention over the past year as the construction of the dam threatens to displace thousands of indigenous people by flooding the land on which they currently reside.  The company’s response to the award, aimed at shaming them into better behavior, was denial.

“Those who have chosen to misrepresent Vale’s record cite our participation on the Belo Monte Project, where we hold a 9% share…[c]learly, we are a minority shareholder” was the response posted.

Those responsible for the award are anxious to see more transparency in big businesses and that the leaders of these companies get held to a higher standard of credibility.  The goal is not as simple as embarrassing the companies; but rather to demonstrate that lack of regulations allows them to get away with blatant disregard for human and environmental rights around the world.

 

For more information, please see;

Latin America Press – Vale Wins “Worst Company” Award – 2 February 2012

Common Dreams – Unique Awards Highlight Corporate Irresponsibility – 29 January 2012

The Guardian – Public Eye Award Singles Out Mining Company Vale, Barclay – 27 January 2012

Reuters – Davos Elite’s Largesse Fails to Appease Critics – 27 January 2012