The Middle East

Update: Continuing International Condemnation Over Israeli Flotilla Raid

Protests Against Israeli Flotilla Raids in New York, Paris, and London (Photo Courtesy of Al-Ahram Weekly)
Protests Against Israeli Flotilla Raids in New York, Paris, and London (Photo Courtesy of Al-Ahram Weekly)

By Warren Popp
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

International condemnation has grown in the days following the raid on 31 May of a flotilla of ships carrying humanitarian aid headed toward Gaza, which Israeli forces commandeered in international waters. During the incident, seven Israeli soldiers were severely injured when activists on the ship allegedly attacked Israeli commandos with knives, Molotov cocktails, clubs, iron bars, and even pistols from the injured Israeli soldiers as they descended upon the ship, and nine activists were allegedly shot and killed by Israeli forces either as they descended and/or from commandos in the helicopter above and in nearby boats.

The United Nations Security Council acted in emergency session and called for independent investigation into the incident. The Human Rights Council also took action in a special sitting call for by Arab and Islamic states and passed a resolution that sets up an independent investigation and calls for an end to Israel’s blockade of Gaza.

While Israel has rejected a demand for any international investigation, they reportedly embraced a U.S. proposal on Thursday for an Israeli inquiry that would include the participation of outside observers.

The UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon, as well as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and other World leaders have joined countries throughout the World in condemning Israeli action in the incident and demanding that the blockade of Gaza be lifted. Mr. Ban noted that this tragedy highlights the underlying problem of the siege of Gaza, stating that the siege was “counter-productive, unsustainable, and wrong.”

While the U.S. took an active role in preventing any direct criticism of Israel in the language of the Security Council Resolution, there are also signs that the incident may be altering the U.S. position towards the U.S. support of the Gaza blockade. The New York Times reports that according to U.S. officials, the international pressure from the incident “create[s] a new opportunity to push for increased engagement with the Palestinian Authority and a less harsh policy toward Gaza”; that the Administration considers Israel’s blockade of Gaza to be untenable; and that they will press for alternative approach’s that will ensure Israel’s security while still allowing more supplies into the impoverished Palestinian area.

People Mourning the death of the flotilla activists in Turkey (Photo Courtesy of the AP)
Mourning the death of the flotilla activists in Turkey (Photo Courtesy of the AP)

Turkey immediately responded to the incident by recalling its ambassador to Israel and canceling joint military exercises. Turkey’s President stated, “Turkey will never forgive Israel for the killing of Turkish citizens.” However, since the release of nearly all of the detained activists, tensions between Israel and Turkey have eased: The Turkish foreign minister said, “It was time that calm replaces anger.”

Due to diplomatic and political considerations, Israel decided not to prosecute dozens of the detained activists, including many who Israel claimed were linked to terrorist groups, including Al-Qaeda, and many who allegedly attacked the Israeli commandos when they descended on the ships.

According to the Associated Press, Israeli Cabinet Minister Isaac Herzog said the release of the activists was an effort, “to take full control of this crisis management and move forward.”

The incident also led to other notable responses by states, including: South Africa temporarily recalling its Ambassador to Israel; Nicaragua severing all diplomatic ties with Israel; Sweden summoning Israel’s ambassador to demand an explanation of the incident; Great Britain calling for an end to the to the blockade; and perhaps most notable the response by Egypt.  Egypt, which kept its border crossing with Gaza closed even during the 2008 Israeli invasion of Gaza, responded to the latest incident by at least temporarily opening the border for humanitarian purposes.

The Israeli foreign ministry spokesman, Yigal Palmor has responded to some of the criticism by stating, “Those who criticize Israel would be better advised to turn their criticism against the terror-supporting rioters from the flotilla, who have nothing to do with humaneness.”

Israel appears to be focusing on its own allegations that the Turkish charity participating in the flotilla mission, the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), to terrorist groups. This characterization is in especially stark contrast to the stated adherence to “the principles of nonviolence and nonviolent resistance in word and deed at all times” that is a stated principle and practice of the Free Gaza Movement, the principle organizer of the flotilla, as well as to the professed peaceful and humanitarian nature of the flotilla’s mission in general.

Israeli Navy personnel board one of the ships of the flotilla (Photo Courtesy of Getty Images)
Israeli Navy personnel board one of the ships of the flotilla (Photo Courtesy of Getty Images)

Israel Remains Committed to Defending its Actions during the Flotilla Incident

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused world leaders for holding Israel to a double standard in regards to Israel’s actions in the interception of a flotilla of ships on May 31 that was purportedly on a humanitarian mission, stating, “Once again, Israel faces hypocrisy and a biased rush to judgment.”

Netanyahu and other Israeli officials have repeatedly justified the actions by the Israeli commandos as acts of self-defense, have claimed that the interception of the flotilla in international waters was permitted by international law, and have stated that it is vital for Israel’s security that they continue to enforce the Gaza blockade.

Israel claims that the lives of the Israeli commandos who descended upon the ships were immediately threatened by passengers on the ships that were armed with knives, Molotov cocktails, clubs, and iron bars, and that they were further threatened as the activists took pistols from the injured soldiers, and even threw one injured soldier down to a lower deck of the ship. Israel claims that the soldiers used force only after their lives were clearly threatened as acts of self-defense.

Netanyahu claimed, “The international community cannot afford an Iranian port on the Mediterranean … The same countries that are criticising us today, should know that they could be targeted tomorrow.” He further states, “Opening a naval route to Gaza will present enormous danger to the security of our citizens”.

Israel claims that if any significant amount of cement and steel were allowed into Gaza without restrictions it would end up in missiles and other weapons that would be used against Israel. (It should be noted that Israel now claims that cement was not found on the ship as initially alleged; however, the Free Gaza ship that is currently in route to Gaza is purported to have 550 tons of concrete.)

However, it appears that Netanyahu is willing to consider easing the naval blockade on Gaza, as well as other creative solutions for monitoring the goods that are allowed to enter the Hamas-ruled territory. The New York Times reported that Netanyahu proposed to Tony Blair, the international envoy of the ‘quartet of Middle East peacemakers’, that an international naval force inspect future aid shipments bound for Gaza.

Amos Gilad, a senior defense official, reportedly said in an interview that in Gaza, “we only have bad solutions, worse solutions and worst solutions”: “Hamas is a terrorist organization sworn to Israel’s destruction. We, on the contrary, are facilitating them to bring in all kinds of food, materials; they are even exporting strawberries and flowers.”

The Most Recent Developments in the Flotilla Incident:

The Hamas minister of social affairs, Ahmad al-Kurd, accused Israel of not delivering all of the supplies from the seized flotilla, including batteries for wheelchairs and cement, and has said that he won’t accept the aid from the flotilla until Israel provides everything that was confiscated and all detainees were released.

Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire (second from left) aboard the MV Rachel Corrie (Photo Courtesy of AFP)
Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire (second from left) aboard the MV Rachel Corrie (Photo Courtesy of AFP)

Another ship from the Fee Gaza movement, the MV Rachel Corrie, which was unable to join the ships in most recent flotilla due to mechanical problems, has been boarded without incident by Israeli forces.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu quickly distinguished the latest incident between the boat filled with Irish and Malaysian activists of the Free Gaza Movement and the Turkish-sponsored activists that was intercepted May 31 in an incident that left nine dead and scores wounded: “The different outcome we saw today underscores the difference between peace activists who we disagree with but respect their right to express their different opinion and flotilla participants who were violent extremist supporters of terrorists.”

In response, the Free Gaza Movement said, “we’d like to remind Mr. Netanyahu that the only hate evidenced on board all six boats on Monday morning came from the Israeli attackers.”

For more information, please see:

Jerusalem Post – Navy Boards, Takes Control of ‘Rachel Corrie’ Off Gaza Coast – 5 June 2010

NY Times – Second Set of Activists Steams Toward Gaza – 4 June 2010

Al Ahram Weekly – Death on the High Seas – 3 June 2010

Al Jazeera – S. Africa Recalls Israeli Ambassador – 3 June 2010

Al Jazeera – Turkey will “never forgive” Israel – 3 June 2010

AP – Israel Trying to Limit Diplomatic Damage From Raid – June 3, 2010

Haaretz.com – Under U.S. Pressure, Netanyahu May Ease Gaza Blockade – June 3, 2010

Jerusalem Post – Flotilla Dead Mourned in Turkey – 3 June 2010

Jerusalem Post – South Africa Recalls Its Ambassador – 3 June 2010

Telegraph.co.uk – Gaza Flotilla Attack: UN Secretary General Demands Blockade be Lifted – 3 June 2010

NY Times – Israeli FM Proposes Inquiry With Foreign Observers – 3 June 2010

Al Arabiya – UN Approves Probe Into Israel’s Ship Raid – 2 June 2010

N.Y. Times – In Bid to Quell Anger Over Raid, Israel Frees Detainees – 2 June 2010

N.Y. Times – New Israeli Tack Needed on Gaza, U.S. Officials Say – 2 June 2010

Free Gaza Movement – Our Mission – 30 January 2009

Free Gaza Movement – We Will Be Back – 30 January 2009

Libya: Execution of Eighteen Foreign Nationals Condemned

African migrants captured in Libya. / Photo Courtesy of BBC 
Many African migrants enter Libya hoping to eventually reach Europe.
Photo Courtesy of BBC Archives, 2009.
 
By Elizabeth A. Conger
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
 

TRIPOLI, Libya – Human rights group Amnesty International has condemned the execution of eighteen foreign nationals in Libya. The eighteen individuals, from Chad, Egypt, and Nigeria, were executed by firing squad on Sunday. According to the Libyan newspaper Cerene, those executed had been convicted of murder. 

Amnesty International’s condemnation of the execution focused on Libya’s trial standards, which fail to satisfy international standards for fair trial.  Malcolm Smart, Amnesty International director for the Middle East and North Africa, said:

“In Libya we fear that death sentences are handed down after proceedings which fail to satisfy international standards for fair trial.”

Cerene reported that fourteen people were executed in Tripoli, Libya’s capital, and four were executed in Benghazi, Libya’s second largest city.

According to Amnesty, foreign nationals are at a disadvantage in the Libyan legal system because they do not have access to lawyers, have no access to their consular representatives, and frequently do not understand the trial proceedings, which are in Arabic. Furthermore, foreign nationals have a harder time getting their sentences commuted because they often have limited financial means, and do not possess the family networks that are necessary for successful negotiation in Libya.

Of the more than 200 people currently on death row in Libya, a disproportionate number of those waiting to be executed are foreign nationals.

Each year thousands of African migrants make their way to Libya with the hope of eventually finding passage to Europe.

For more information, please see:

BBC – Libyan executions of foreigners are condemned – 2 June 2010

AFP – Amnesty condems Libya executions – 2 June 2010

Amnesty International – Libya: Amnesty International Condemns Executions of 18 People Including Foreign Nations in Libya by Firing Squad – 1 June 2010

Israeli Attack on Gaza Aid Flotilla Sparks International Condemnation

By Polly Johnson
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

Israeli attack on aid ship sparked outrage. (Photo Courtesy of New York Times).
Israeli attack on aid ship has sparked outrage. (Photo Courtesy of New York Times).

NEW YORK, New York – The United Nations Security Council convened for an emergency session in New York on Monday after an Israeli attack on a flotilla carrying aid to Palestinians in Gaza resulted in the deaths of as many as ten people, many of whom were Turkish.

Dozens more were injured in the attack that took place Monday on the Freedom Flotilla –  six ships carrying over ten thousand tons of aid and six hundred passengers from more than twenty countries. Organized by the pro-Palestinian Free Gaza Movement, Sunday’s trip to Gaza was to be the final leg of the journey. Even after repeated warnings from Israel not to enter the hostile area, the flotilla entered the Gaza shore. At that point, reports as to who instigated the attack are conflicting.

Israel claims that commandos on board attacked Israelis with clubs, metal rods and knives as soon as they entered the ship. The flotilla’s organizers claim that the Israelis opened fire “on sleeping civilians” upon boarding the ship.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the attack and said that Israel regretted the loss of life. He cancelled a Tuesday meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama to return to Israel.

The attack has not only strained tensions between Israel and Turkey, close allies in the Muslim world, but has caused international outrage and worldwide protests.

At the U.N., Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said that Israel’s acts were tantamount to “murder conducted by a state.”

The United States expressed concern at the U.N. meeting but also expressed that the facts of the attack were still unclear. Namik Tan, the Turkish ambassador to the United States, called the U.S.’s response, “sort of weak.”

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has called for a three-day mourning period across the West Bank.

Turkey, Indonesia, Syria, Russia, Egypt, Britain, Italy, France, Greece, and Sweden, among other countries, have spoken out against the attacks. Said Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minster Bulent Arinc, “this operation will leave a bloody stain on the history of humanity.”

In New York, more than 500 people gathered in Times Square and walked to the Israeli consulate in protest.

The trip was Free Gaza’s ninth attempt at shipping humanitarian aid to Gaza since August 2008. The convoy included items that Israel bars from reaching Gaza.

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Deadly Israel raid on aid fleet – 1 June 2010

BBC – UN members decry Israeli raid on Gaza aid flotilla – 31 May 2010

CNN – Israeli raid met with global protests – 31 May 2010

New York Times – Deadly Israeli Raid Draws Condemnation – 31 May 2010

NPR – Condemnation Follows Israeli Raid on Gaza Flotilla – 31 May 2010

The Jerusalem Post – Turkey demands int’l inquiry c’tee – 1 June 2010

Summer Camp in Gaza Destroyed by Extremists

By Dallas Steele,
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

The burnt remains of the summer camp (Photo Courtesy of CNN.com)
The burnt remains of the summer camp (Photo Courtesy of CNN.com)

GAZA CITY, Gaza – A children’s summer camp in Gaza was burned to the ground by a group of masked men on Sunday. The men broke in to the camp, tied and beat up a security guard, and burned the tents and plastic swimming pools that had been set up for the camp. While no one was injured by the fire, the summer camp, sponsored by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), was due to open mere hours before its destruction occurred.

A group of suspects was arrested by Hamas leaders in Gaza on Tuesday, but no group has yet claimed responsibility for the destruction of the camp. It is widely believed, however, that the attack was carried out by a band of Islamic extremists who are opposed to summer camps that allow boys and girls to mingle. John Ging, UNRWA’s Gaza director, has told reporters that the attack was committed by people with an “extremist mentality.”

The ruined summer camp is one of the largest of the several UNRWA camps across the occupied Palestinian territory. After destroying the camp, the masked militants left behind three bullets and a letter addressed to the United Nations warning them to stop sponsoring the summer camps.

Ging has reportedly remained defiant and vowed to not allow such acts to intimidate UNRWA. Furthermore, he pledged to not only continue all other camps in Gaza as planned, but to also repair the damaged camp.

The attack comes as a major loss for children in the area as nearly 250,000 campers are known to attend every summer. Additionally, many parents now fear for the safety of their children from similar attacks in the future.

It is speculated that the recent attack is another in a handful of attacks executed by small, radical groups looking to impose Islamic law in Gaza, something Hamas has yet to do since its takeover of the territory in June 2007.

For more information, please see:

CNN — Gaza summer camp burned, witnesses say — 23 May 2010

Al Jazeera — Gaza children’s camp destroyed — 23 May 2010

Yahoo! News — Hamas makes arrest over torching of UN summer camp — 25 May 2010

Bahrain Bans Al Jazeera

By Warren Popp
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

Al Jazeera faces indefinite ban in Bahrain (Source: Al Jazeera)
Al Jazeera faces an indefinite ban in Bahrain. (Source: Al Jazeera)

MANAMA, Bahrain — On May 18, Bahrain banned Qatari-based Al Jazeera from operating within Bahrain for an indefinite period of time, and barred a broadcast crew from traveling to Bahrain to interview former UN Climate Chief Yvo De Boer. According to the official Bahrain News Agency, the ban was imposed for “breaching the professional media norms and flouting the laws regulating the press and publishing.”

In response to the ban, Al Jazeera claims it was “surprised and puzzeled” by the decision. They also expressed regret that the decision was never officially conveyed to them, and said its editorial line and professional policy in reporting on the news and on issues has not changed. Al Jazeera reiterated that it continues to adhere to its motto, “Equal opportunity for opinions and counter opinions.”

It is still unclear what precipitated this sudden ban, especially given that Al Jazeera does not even have a bureau office in Bahrain. According to Tunisian journalist Habib Toumi, the Information Minister claimed the ban was imposed because Al Jazeera was deliberately attempting to harm Bahrain and that it was demonstrating a bias towards Israel. Claims of bias towards Israel have caused the banning of Al Jazeera’s broadcasts in several Arab countries in the past.

Israel also had a major clash with Al Jazeera last year, imposing sanctions on the broadcaster after Qatar closed the Israeli trade office in opposition to Israel’s military offensive in the Gaza Strip. Israel responded by calling the station a hostile entity and to sought to close its offices in Israel. However, Isreal’s High Court of Justice prevented this action, and instead chose chose to limit the network’s activity in Israel and Palestine.

The Bahraini ban may also have been the result of Al Jazeera’s recent programs on poverty and the treatment of Asian laborers, which are purportedly sensitive matters in Bahrain. Other observers believe that it is simply a reflection of persistent tensions between Bahrain and Qatar since the settlement of a dispute over the Hawar Islands in 2001.

In the statement announcing the ban, Bahrain’s Culture and Information Ministry said, “The decision to freeze the activities of the office will be maintained until the ministry and the channel agree on a memorandum of understanding protecting the rights of both sides on the basis of reciprocity in exercising press and media work in both countries.”

According to Gulf Daily News, Bahrain Journalists Association deputy chairman Faisal Abdulla Shaikh said that he believes it is in everyone’s best interests that the dispute be resolved immediately. Watchdog groups such as the Committee to Protect Journalists have also condemned the decision. Reporters Without Borders stated its concern regarding the ban, and they “urge the culture and information ministry to rescind this decision.”

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Bahrain Blocks Al Jazeera Team – 19 May 2010

Bahrain New Agency – Bahrain-based Al Jazeera Office Temporarily Frozen s Age – 18 May 2010

Gulf Daily News – Call to Resolve Al Jazeera Row – 25 May 2010

GlobalVoices – Bahrain: Why was Al Jazeera’s Office Shut Down? – 19 May 2010

Guardian News – Bahrain Suspends Al-Jazeera Operations and Bars TV Crew – 19 May 2010

Haaretz.com – Bahrain Suspends Al-Jazeera for ‘Flouting Press Laws’ – 19 May 2010

Habib Toumi – Bahrain Defends Decision to Freeze Al Jazeera’s Activities as Reporters Without Borders Urges Manama to Reconsider its Move – 20 May 2010