The Middle East

Disagreement Regarding Iranian Resistance Group’s Fate

By Laura Zuber
Impunity Watch Senior Desk Officer, Middle East

BAGHDAD, IRAQ – On December 21, Iraq’s National Security Adviser, Mowaffak al-Rubaie, traveled to Camp Ashraf, in Diyala Province, and met with leaders of the People’s Mujahideen of Iran (PMOI).  According to a statement from Rubaie, he told PMOI that “the government has plans to close the camp and deport its inhabitants to their native country, or voluntarily to a third country, and that staying in Iraq was not an option.”

The PMOI was founded in 1965 with the aim of replacing first the shah and then the clerical regime in Iran.  In the 1980s, the group was expelled from Iran and found refuge in Camp Ashraf, in Iraq.  It was financed by Saddam Hussein to carry out attacks against the regime in Tehran.  However, following the US invasion in 2003, the group has been disarmed.  

Despite being disarmed, the group remains designated as a terrorist organization by the US and the EU, as well as the Iraqi government.  However, PMOI has been under U.S. military protection following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.  

The Iraqi government informed the group that it would soon assume responsibility for security at Camp Ashraf and that residents would be repatriated unless they find a third country willing to take them.  It is assumed that the statement means that once the UN mandate in Iraq expires, the Iraqi government will forcibly expel the PMOI members living in Camp Ashraf.  Currently, there are 3,500 residents at the camp.

PMOI have criticized the Iraqi government’s attempt to expel its members.  According to the PMOI, it members at Camp Ashraf are protected persons under the Fourth Geneva Convention.  In addition, PMOI claims that its members will be executed if they are forced to return to Iran. Additionally, PMOI claims that its members are protected as refugees.

A statement from the group’s political wing, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), condemned the Iraqi government decision, saying it was a “blatant violation” of international law.  The NCRI condemned the Iraqi government statements, saying the closure of Camp Ashraf “sets the stage for war crimes, crimes against humanity and is a blatant violation of international laws and conventions.”

On December 22, the AFP reported that the US has received assurances from Baghdad regarding the Iranian rebel group.  According to White House spokesman, Benjamin Chang, Iraqi government had promised Washington in writing that members of the PMOI at a camp north of Baghdad would be treated humanely.

“What the (Iraqi) government has said is that no one will be forcibly transferred to a country where they fear persecution on account of political or religious beliefs or (where) they might face torture,” Chang said.

The Iraqi government is under considerable pressure from the Iranian government to expel the group.  During the Iran-Iraq War, PMOI was believed to be involved in cross border raids into Iran.

For more information, please see:

Middle East Times – Iranian Reform Groups Urge Action in Iraq – 23 December 2008

AFP – US has Assurances from Iraq on Iranian Rebels: Officials – 22 December 2008

Middle East Times – Iranian Resistance Slams Iraqi Exile Order – 22 December 2008

NY Times – Iranian Resistance Group Criticizes Iraq’s Efforts to Expel It – 22 December 2008

Washington Post – Iraq Threatens to Expel Iranian Rebels – 22 December 2008

BBC – Iraq says Iran Exiles Must Leave – 21 December 2008

Saudi Court Refuses to Grant 8-Year-Old Girl a Divorce

By Lauren Mellinger
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – On December 20, a Saudi Arabian court rejected a plea to grant a divorce to an eight-year-old girl from an arranged marriage with a man 50 years her senior.

The girl’s father had agreed to marry her off in exchange for a dowry of 30,000 riyals (US $7,500), paid to the girl’s father in advance of the marriage.  At the time the agreement was reached the girl’s father was experiencing financial difficulty.  The money he obtained from the marriage contract would be sufficient to erase all of his debt.

According to relatives of the girl, the marriage has not been consummated and the girl continues to live with her mother, at least until the case is heard on appeal.  The terms of the marriage contract arranged between the girl’s father and the groom stipulate that the marriage is not to be consummated for another 10 years, until the girl reaches the age of 18.  As of now, the girl has not been informed that she is married.

The girl’s husband considers the marriage to have been entered into legally and refuses to divorce her.  The girl’s father was present in court but continues to support the marriage contract he entered into on behalf of his daughter.

The case was brought before the court in Unayzah by the girl’s mother in August, shortly after the marriage contract had been signed by the girls father and the groom.  At the time the case was filed the girl had not yet reached the age of puberty and under Saudi law could not file a claim on her behalf. According to the presiding judge Sheikh Habib al-Habib, the girl could file the case herself when she reaches puberty.  Currently a lawyer for the girl’s mother is appealing the verdict to the Court of Cassation – the Supreme Court of Saudi Arabia.  However, the Court of Cassation applies Sharia law, and arranged marriages, including those involving pre-adolescents are common in Saudi Arabia, where the majority of the population observes the strict Wahabi interpretation of Sunni Islam.

The girls’ lawyer, Abdullah al-Jutaili, is urging the government to use this opportunity to improve regulations for marriage procedures throughout the country.  In this case, the 58-year-old groom was able to obtain a premarital health certification for the girl, despite the fact that she is only eight-years-old.  According to Al-Jutaili, the notaries who issue marriage contracts are a large part of the problem, as they often issue the certificates without first seeking the consent of the bride, and taking into account the reports of the health workers regarding the premarital tests.

For more information, please see: 

Arab News – Court Rejects Onaizah Girl’s Divorce Plea – 22 December 2008 

Gulf Daily News – Divorce Plea is Rejected – 22 December 2008

Sky News – No Divorce for Eight Year Old – 22 December 2008

AFP – Saudi Court Rejects Divorcing Eight-Year-Old Girl – 20 December 2008

Sydney Morning Herald – Delay on Divorce Running for Girl, 8 – 20 December 2008

Iranian Authorities Close the Defenders of Human Rights Center

By Yasmine S. Hakimian
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TEHRAN, Iran – On December 21, Iranian authorities raided and indefinitely closed down the Defenders of Human Rights Center (DHRC) in Tehran. The DHRC was founded five years ago by 2003 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi. Ebadi received the award for her human rights work, making her the first Iranian to receive the honor. Ebadi was arrested at the raid and taken into custody for several hours. No other arrests were made, but the office remains closed.

The DHRC served as a place to report human rights violations in Iran, defend political prisoners and support families of those prisoners. The raid occurred as the center was preparing a celebration to mark the 60th anniversary of Human Rights Day on December 10.

Iran’s judiciary confirmed the closure of the center, stating it was involved in illegal activities. The judiciary claims the center was acting as a political party without obtaining a legal permit. The center is targeted for having illegal contacts with local and foreign organizations, and organizing news conferences.

In August 2006, the Iranian government informed Ebadi that the center was illegal and planned to arrest those who continued to work there.

According to Narges Mohammadi, deputy head of the center, dozens of policemen entered the office without showing a search warrant. The policemen said they were not obliged to show a warrant because they were wearing police uniforms. Iranian authorities have provided no written justification for the raid.

The DHRC is a member of the International Federation for Human Rights and has also been awarded a human rights prize by the Human Rights National Commission in France.

Over the years, Ebadi’s advocacy of human rights has led to imprisonment and a stream of threatening letters and telephone calls. Ebadi has noted the raid will not stop human rights activists in Iran. She insists the raid was illegal and she plans to protest.

 

For more information, please see:

CNN – Iran Raids, Closes Office, Nobel Winner Says – 21 December 2008

Huffington Post – Shirin Ebadi Office Shut Down by Iran: Nobel Laureate Claims Harassment – 21 December 2008

Iran Press Watch – Police Raid, Close Offices of Shirin Ebadi – 21 December 2008

News Daily – Police Raids Iran Nobel Laureate’s Office – 21 December 2008

Iranian Authorities Close the Defenders of Human Rights Center

By Yasmine S. Hakimian
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TEHRAN, Iran – On December 21, Iranian authorities raided and indefinitely closed down the Defenders of Human Rights Center (DHRC) in Tehran. The DHRC was founded five years ago by 2003 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi. Ebadi received the award for her human rights work, making her the first Iranian to receive the honor. Ebadi was arrested at the raid and taken into custody for several hours. No other arrests were made, but the office remains closed.

The DHRC served as a place to report human rights violations in Iran, defend political prisoners and support families of those prisoners. The raid occurred as the center was preparing a celebration to mark the 60th anniversary of Human Rights Day on December 10.

Iran’s judiciary confirmed the closure of the center, stating it was involved in illegal activities. The judiciary claims the center was acting as a political party without obtaining a legal permit. The center is targeted for having illegal contacts with local and foreign organizations, and organizing news conferences.

In August 2006, the Iranian government informed Ebadi that the center was illegal and planned to arrest those who continued to work there.

According to Narges Mohammadi, deputy head of the center, dozens of policemen entered the office without showing a search warrant. The policemen said they were not obliged to show a warrant because they were wearing police uniforms. Iranian authorities have provided no written justification for the raid.

The DHRC is a member of the International Federation for Human Rights and has also been awarded a human rights prize by the Human Rights National Commission in France.

Over the years, Ebadi’s advocacy of human rights has led to imprisonment and a stream of threatening letters and telephone calls. Ebadi has noted the raid will not stop human rights activists in Iran. She insists the raid was illegal and she plans to protest.

 

For more information, please see:

CNN – Iran Raids, Closes Office, Nobel Winner Says – 21 December 2008

Huffington Post – Shirin Ebadi Office Shut Down by Iran: Nobel Laureate Claims Harassment – 21 December 2008

Iran Press Watch – Police Raid, Close Offices of Shirin Ebadi – 21 December 2008

News Daily – Police Raids Iran Nobel Laureate’s Office – 21 December 2008

Israeli Teenagers Jailed for Refusal to Enlist in the Army

By Yasmine S. Hakimian
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TEL AVIV, Israel – On December 24, peace activists in Israel and around the world are participating in a day of action to urge Israeli authorities to release teenagers imprisoned for refusing to serve in the army for reasons of conscience. The day will include a rally and press event near the Defense Ministry. 

Nearly 100 Israeli high school students have signed an open letter declaring their refusal to serve in the Israeli army and their opposition to Israeli occupation and oppression policy in the occupied territories and the territories of Israel. They have voiced their concern in taking no part to further commit human rights abuses. 

There is a history of refusal to serve in Israel. Military service is mandatory for all graduating high school seniors in Israel. Resisters of enlisting face the possibility of years in prison.

Tamar Katz, Raz Bar-David Varon and Yuval Oron-Ofir are three conscientious objectors currently serving their third prison sentences. Katz (19) has been jailed for over fifty days. She is being held in isolation and deprived of family visits as punishment for refusing to wear a military uniform in prison. At least six other Israeli teenagers have been jailed in the past few months for refusing to enlist. 

There is no civilian service alternative to military draft in Israel. A “conscience committee” exists within the Israeli army, however, exemption is generally only granted to those who refuse to serve for religious reasons. Orthodox Yeshiva students are exempt from military service, and Orthodox girls can apply for alternative service.

Donatella Rovera, Amnesty International’s researcher on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, explains all conscientious objectors should be given the opportunity to present the grounds of their objection to a decision-making body which is impartial and independent. According to Amnesty International, the conscience-committee is sending the wrong message to Israelis.

Amnesty International asks Israeli authorities to establish an impartial exemption committee. Amnesty seeks the immediate and unconditional release of the teenagers and other conscience of war prisoners.

For more information, please see:

AlterNet – From U.S. War Resisters, A Letter of Solidarity to Israeli Army Resisters – 18 December 2008

Amnesty International – Israeli Teenagers Jailed For Refusing to Serve in Army – 18 December 2008

Common Dreams – Israeli Youth Resist Palestinian Occupation – 17 December 2008

Electronic Intifada – We Refuse to Serve in the Israeli Occupation – 28 August 2008