Uncategorized

Police Strike Expected to Bring Severe Economic Damage to Brazil in Wake of Carnival

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil  — Over the last week, the murder rate in Salvador has doubled as police officers walked off the job in an organized strike over a week ago. Police all across the country are demanding better pay and benefits as well as a national minimum wage for all uniformed forces. According to the Brazilian Association of Tourism Agencies, at least 10 percent of tourists have already canceled their trips to Rio for Carnival out of fear for their safety.

Police officers go on strike, demanding higher pay. (Photo Courtesy of LA Times).

More than 1000 police officers and firefighters gathered in downtown Rio on Thursday to protest their low wages. The Brazilian government arrested 16 leaders of the strike on Friday and over 100 officers could face summary expulsion for not showing up for patrols.

According to David Fleischer, a political scientists at the University of Brasilia, the government of Rio is coming down with an “iron fist” in order to halt the chaos in Rio before Carnival. “Police in Rio had been doing an excellent job of improving safety in the city, so this is unexpected and extremely embarrassing,” he said.

Although Brazil now has the sixth-largest economy, the recent strike has called into question the country’s ability to put on two of the largest sporting events in the world — the World Cup in 2014 and the Olympic Games in 2016. Safety in most major cities in Brazil has been improving of the last couple years, but crime is still a problem and may be contributed to the low wages and corruption of police officers.

Since the strike began in the metropolitan area of Salvador last week, roughly 150 people have died in Salvador and shopkeepers and tourists officials claim the economic damage is immense. Salvador holds the second largest Carnival festival in Brazil, attracting approximately 500,000 tourists each year. The state tourism secretariat says that tourists contribute about $300 million dollars into local economy each year during Carnival.

According to Jorge Cardeiro, a salesman at the high-end boutique, Projeto Axe Design, Carnival is a crucial time for Brazil’s economy and the police strike may have caused irreversible economic damage. “This place has been so empty it feels like sales are down 100 percent, but really they’ve fallen more than 70 percent. I don’t know how we’re going to make it up,” he said. The U.S. State Department has already issued an advisory warning to Americans against traveling to Salvador.

Although violence in Salvador seems to be cooling down, Intelligence officials are concerned after intercepting a cellphone conversation that revealed a plan by police officials to cause acts violence and vandalism in a strike that would extend to Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. A violent strike in Rio could be more economically damaging than the strike in Salvador, especially during Carnival, where tourists already come concerned about their safety even with the police force working properly.

Military patrols are stepping in to help keep businesses open in Rio as preparations for Carnival street parades continue despite the tension.

 

For further information, please see:

CBS News – Crime Cutting into Brazil’s Carnivals Amid Strike – 11 February 2011

LA Times – Brazil Arrests Strike Leaders to Halt Police Work Stoppage in Rio – 11 February 2012

Reuters  – Brazil Police Strike Spreads to Rio Before Carnival – 10 February 2012

Washington Post – Rio Calm in 2nd Day of Police Strike With Low Adherence Rate – 10 February 2012

The New York Times – Police Strike by Brazilians Makes Holiday Seem a Threat – 09 February 2012

Brazilian Mining Company Vale Wins Dubious Award Highlighting Human Rights and Environmental Abuses

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America 

BRASÍLIA, Brazil – Just recently the annual award for the “worst big company” was given to Brazilian company, Vale.  Close to 89,000 votes were placed online and Vale received just over 25,000 of them.

An advertisement by the Public Eye nominating Vale for the worst company award. (Photo courtesy of Public Eye)

Vale is officially this year’s winner for having the most “contempt for the environment and human rights.”  The undesired award is co-organized by the Swiss nonprofit, the Berne Declaration and Greenpeace Switzerland.  The award is an antagonistic response to the Davos summit hosted each year at this time by the World Economic Forum. 

The Davos coordinators and participants portray themselves as protectors of human rights but those critical of them note that they only represent the “privileged 1%.”  Its members are the 1,000 most profitable and powerful companies globally.

Vale is a mining company and a shareholder in the disputed Belo Monte dam project in Brazil.  As reported by the Public Eye, Vale is the second-largest corporation in Brazil and the second-largest mining corporation internationally as well.  They currently have operations in over 40 countries world-wide.

The company has a long history of abuses.  Reports over the years have cited; terrible working conditions, forced displacement of indigenous people on many of their projects, use of paramilitary leaders to repress indigenous leaders and incalculable environmental damages.  As well, health complications have arisen in the vicinities surrounding Vale’s coal-burning facilities.

The company’s operations in Brazil make up 4% of the carbon emissions in all of the country.  They use 1.2 billion cubic meters of water annually, which is enough to meet the needs of 22,000 people for a one year period.  They also dumped 114 million cubic meters of waste last year.   

The current Belo Monte project they are involved in has garnered media attention over the past year as the construction of the dam threatens to displace thousands of indigenous people by flooding the land on which they currently reside.  The company’s response to the award, aimed at shaming them into better behavior, was denial.

“Those who have chosen to misrepresent Vale’s record cite our participation on the Belo Monte Project, where we hold a 9% share…[c]learly, we are a minority shareholder” was the response posted.

Those responsible for the award are anxious to see more transparency in big businesses and that the leaders of these companies get held to a higher standard of credibility.  The goal is not as simple as embarrassing the companies; but rather to demonstrate that lack of regulations allows them to get away with blatant disregard for human and environmental rights around the world.

 

For more information, please see;

Latin America Press – Vale Wins “Worst Company” Award – 2 February 2012

Common Dreams – Unique Awards Highlight Corporate Irresponsibility – 29 January 2012

The Guardian – Public Eye Award Singles Out Mining Company Vale, Barclay – 27 January 2012

Reuters – Davos Elite’s Largesse Fails to Appease Critics – 27 January 2012

Russian and Chinese Vetoes Prevent Passage of UN Resolution Condemning Syrian Violence

By Tyler Yates
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

DAMASCUS, Syria — Russia and China voted against a draft resolution that would have condemned a crackdown on anti-government protests in Syria and called on Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, to step aside.

The United Nations Security Council (Photo Courtesy of Al Jazeera).

The countries, two of the United Nations Security Council’s permanent members, have veto power over resolutions put before the Council.

A statement from the Russian ambassador to the United Nations said the resolution, “sent an unbalanced signal to the Syrian parties” by not condemning violence on the part of the armed opposition to the same degree that it did for the Syrian government.

Internationally, the vetoes received tremendous criticism.  Qatar’s minister of state for foreign affairs said the vetoes sent “ a very bad signal to [President Bashar al-Assad] that there is a license to kill.” Other Western and Arab leaders echoed Qatar’s reaction.

Europe will strengthen sanctions imposed on Damascus in a bid to boost pressure on the regime, France said on Sunday. The United States has vowed to block funding and arms supplies to Syria.

“We will work to seek regional and national sanctions against Syria and strenghten the ones we have. They will be implemented to the fullest to dry up the sources of funding and the arms shipments that are keeping the regime’s war machine going,”  US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Sunday.

Despite these international efforts the opposition in Syria is now forced to attempt to stop the government crackdown by itself.

Colonel Riad al-Asaad, commander of the FSA, said that “there is no other road” except military action by his fighters to topple Assad.

Iran welcomed the vetoes from China and Russia, calling the sanctions “just.”

“The Security Council has become a tool for the West’s bullying … of other nations, and this time Russia and China stood up against it,” one of Iran’s top diplomat said.

The Syrian government also saw the vetoes as a victory, saying that the result should be an acceptance of the regime’s program for solving the evolving crisis.

The Tishreen, a state run newspaper, called the vetoes an incentive for Damascus to continue with its announced political reforms, which include drafting a new constitution, allowing the formation of new political parties, and holding parliamentary elections.

It further suggested that the international community support talks between the government and the opposition.

At the same time, it declared that the government would continue with its crackdown, saying it would “restore what the Syrians enjoyed for decades and what they are demanding today which is stability and security and confronting all forms of terrorism.”

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera —Qatar says UN veteos sent “bad signal” —  05 Feb. 2012

Al Jazeera — Veto power at the UN Security Council — 05 Feb. 2012

Huffington Post — Russia, China Veto Of Syria UN Resolution Sparks Outrage — 05 Feb. 2012

NPR — Syria Veto “Outrageous” Says UN Envoy Susan Rice — 05 Feb. 2012

Reuters — Clinton calls UN Syria vote a “travesty” — o5 Feb. 2012

 

 

 

 

Human Rights Watch Brings Focus to the Problem of Elderly Prisoners

By Brittney Hodnik
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

WASHINGTON, United States – According to figures from 2010, eight percent of the prison population (or 124,400 inmates) is 55 years old or older.  This number is up from three percent in 1995.  A report released by Human Rights Watch acknowledged this change and demonstrated why this is such a problem.

The growing elderly prison population causes problems for states, facilities, officers, and the prisoners themselves. (Image courtesy of CNN)

Human Rights Watch issued a 106-page report titled “Old Behind Bars: The Aging Prison Population in the United States.”  Not only does the report outline the problems, but also calls for changes on harsh sentencing rules, mandatory minimum sentences, reduced opportunities for parole, and additional changes in prison facilities.

Not only does the aging prison population cause problems for the prisons themselves, but also for taxpayers and policymakers.  According to CNN, older prisoners incur medical costs that are three to nine times higher than younger prisoners.

Jamie Fellner, a Human Rights Watch special adviser who wrote the report, sees extreme comparisons between prisons and geriatric facilities.  “U.S. corrections officials now operate old age homes behind bars,” Fellner said, as reported by TIME.

Elderly prisoners face many issues within the prisons themselves.  The facilities are not equipped for wheelchairs; the elderly cannot easily climb into top bunks or up sets of stairs.  Some facilities struggle with whether they need grab bars and handicap toilets for elderly inmates.

A.T. Wall is the director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections and president of the Association of State Correctional Administrators.  According to TIME, Wall said “Dementia can set in, and an inmate who was formerly easy to manage becomes very difficult to manage.”  He continued on to explain, “There are no easy solutions.”

While the report wants changes in many areas of sentencing, Human Rights Watch is not advocating for complete release.  According to The New York Times, Fellner said, “Age should be a get-out-of-jail-free card, but when prisoners are so old and infirm that they are not a threat to public safety, they should be released under supervision.”  Fellner goes on to argue that if changes are not made soon, “legislatures are going to have to pony up a lot more money to pay for proper care for them behind bars.”

Besides lengthy sentences and more life sentences, the other factor that contributes to the elderly inmate population is that the number of old people entering for the first time, according to The New York Times.

Although the lacking budget in most states hinders significant change, some states are really making an effort.  For example: The Louisiana State Penitentiary has a hospice program where fellow prisoners provide care for their fellow dying inmates.  They provide everything from changing diapers to saying prayers, according to TIME.

Other states like Washington and Montana are looking into opening assisted living facilities for elderly inmates.  Each facility is small – capacities of 74 and 120 beds respectively – but will provide specialized treatment for the elderly inmates.

The biggest dilemma is that some of the inmates are still dangerous and some are not, so it is difficult to create a bright line rule for release.

In a nation where sentences seem to get longer and longer, the problem is only going to get worse.  The report points out that almost 10% of state prisoners are serving a life sentence, according to CNN.  Furthermore, another 11.2% have sentences longer than 20 years.

While facility changes are beginning, the report points out the fact that guards and other correctional officers are not trained properly to deal with the elderly.  Linda Redford, director of the geriatric education center at the University of Kansas Medical Center has helped train prison staff and inmates to better deal with geriatric prisoners.  Even the medical staff is not prepared to deal with it: “They’re used to having to deal with issues of younger prisoners, such as HIV and substance abuse,” Redford said, according to TIME.

States and prisons will continue to try to deal with caring for elderly patients.  Often times they are disregarded due to their inmate status.  The Human Rights Watch report will hopefully point out some of the common problems across the nation.

According to the Lawrence Journal World, Feller begs us to ask the question, “How are justice and public safety served by the continued incarceration of men and women whose bodies and minds have been whittled away by age?”

For more information, please visit:

CNN — Human Rights Watch Expresses Concern for Aging Prisoners — 27 Jan. 2012

Lawrence World Journal — As Inmates Age, Medical Costs Soar — 27 Jan. 2012

TIME/AP — Number of Elderly Inmates Surges — 27 Jan. 2012

The New York Times — Older Prisoners Mean Rising Health Costs, Study Finds — 26 Jan. 2012

 

Impunity Watch Launches Online Law Journal App

by Staff
Impunity Watch

Announcing the Launch of the Impunity Watch App
The First Online Law Journal App

Learning about human rights violations and other instances of government impunity is now available through smartphone. Impunity Watch, the first global, law student-run blog to monitor instances of impunity, has launched its first official mobile application in the Android Marketplace, available January 25, with its Apple Store version available soon. Impunity Watch is managed by Syracuse University College of Law student reporters who constantly monitor human rights news around the world.


“The app allows users to read news from all over the world,” says Laura E. Hirahara, a third-year law student and technical director for Impunity Watch.  “As the first law journal app, it allows readers to interact with the website and receive instant updates on human rights issues on their phone.”

Impunity Watch, which was founded by Syracuse University College of Law Professor David M. Crane L’80, the former chief prosecutor of the Special Court to Sierra Leone, offers readers an exclusive online format that provides uncensored online dialogue that sorts issues of impunity by global regions and a separate area that allows posting of academic or formal papers on the issues of impunity.

The app is currently available for Android smartphones, and will be available on the Apple App Market soon. You can download the app from the Android Market by clicking here.

For the latest information about the new app, visit Impunity Watch at http://www.impunitywatch.net, follow the blog on Twitter @ImpuniTweet and on Facebook.

Don’t have a smartphone? Don’t worry, even though you still haven’t entered 2012, you can still follow Impunity Watch on Twitter and Facebook, or visit our website to sign up for our RSS Feed or have daily news headlines sent to your email.