Uncategorized

Venezuela Under International Scrutiny for Attacks Against Activists

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela – United Nations’ Human Rights Council issued 148 recommendations for Venezuela recently, in part because of the various reports of government human rights abuses towards activists who have publicly criticized government policies. Venezuela, however, has rejected the recommendations despite requests for change from its own allies.

Venezuelan human rights activist Humberto Prado has fallen victim to what he believes is government induced harassment. (Photo courtesy of ABC News).

Humberto Prado, 48, an ex-prison inmate turned director and founder of a prison monitoring group, claims he has been fearing for his life ever since he became an activist for prison reform. After criticizing conditions in a prison where inmates rioted in June, Prado began receiving anonymous phone calls at all hours of the night threatening to kill him.

Government officials, however, have ignored his complaints and Prado suspects that they might even be behind the threats. As the harassment intensified and government indifference continued, Amnesty International helped Prado and his family flee to Spain.

Prado is one of many activists who have fallen victim to attacks after President Hugo Chavez took office. Over the last 12 years, 83 activists have been attacked or harassed and 10 have been killed.

Out of the cases involving attacks on activists in Venezuela this year, the Committee of Victims’ Relatives reports that only 13 percent of them are being tried in court while the remaining have been either dismissed or remain in the preliminary investigative stage.

According to the director of the Committee of Victims’ Relatives, Liliana Ortega, various nonprofit groups have been investigated for improper funding after publicly denouncing government policies. Additionally, human rights groups have also reported arbitrary police arrests of activists, illegal wiretapping and restrictions on public meetings.

Last Friday, during the United Nations Periodic Review of Human Rights convention in Geneva, some of Venezuela’s allies, including Brazil, Russia, and Turkey, expressed concern over Venezuela’s criminal procedures, specifically it’s procedural delays, and other human rights issues.

A member of the Venezuela delegation who attended the convention but who wants to remain anonymous was surprised to hear criticism coming from Venezuelan allies. “”The fact that the United States, Britain and Germany questioned the Judiciary was predictable, but Brazil’s criticisms were not,” he said.

The Brazilian delegation expressed concerned about how closely judges and prosecutors work together in criminal proceedings. They called for a more independent judiciary in order to guarantee citizens of Venezuela the essential conditions of a democracy.

For further information, please see:

ABC News – Threats, Violence Rising for Venezuelan Activists – 14 October 2011

El Universal – Even Allies Questioned Venezuela at the UN Human Rights Council – 14 October 2011

CNN – Venezuela Rejects Certain Human Rights Recommendations – 11 October 2011

El Universal – US Asks Venezuela to “Reconsider” Human Rights Suggestions

– 12 October  2011

 

Tunis TV Station Under Criminal Investigation for Airing ‘Persepolis’

By Tyler Yates
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TUNIS, Tunisia, — The interim government of Tunisia is currently investigating a television station for airing the animated film Persepolis.  Specifically, they are investigating whether the station should face charges for “defaming” Islam by airing the film.

Islamist protesters were angered by the scene in Persepolis in which God is pictorially depicted (Photo courtesy of The Guardian). .

Persepolis is a semi-autobiographical film by Marjane Satrapi based upon her best-selling graphic novel of the same name.  It depicts her early childhood through adult years in Iran during and after the Islamic revolution.  One scene includes an imaginary conversation with God, who is represented by a man with a white beard.  Many Muslims consider such pictorial depictions of God to be prohibited.

The film was dubbed into the Tunisian dialect of Arabic for the airing.

On October 9, two days after the film’s airing, more than 300 protesters marched on the Tunis headquarters of Nessma TV.  Police, having gained prior knowledge of the protest from Facebook, were on hand to prevent the protesters from reaching the building and made around 50 arrests.

An Interior Ministry official was quoted as saying that many of the protesters were carrying weapons, including knives, bars, and sticks.  Hichem Meddeb, a ministry spokesman, said that arrests were made after protesters began throwing rocks.

The National Commission for the Reform of Media and Communication has come out condemning “all forms of violence and attempts to intimidate journalists.” They also called on media outlets to abide by the code of press ethics, and to exhibit responsibility.

A complaint about the film’s airing was sent to the Tunisian government and was signed by 144 individuals.  The complaint sought charges to be brought against Nessma’s director and others under the press code and penal code. The press code says in articles 44 and 48 that a person found guilty of inciting hatred among religions or insulting a religion can be sentenced to prison. Penal code article 226bis says that a person found guilty of undermining public morals by “intentionally disturbing other persons in a way that offends the sense of public decency” can be sentenced to prison.

On October 11, after receiving the complaint, the state prosecutor opened up the case against Nessma.

Human Rights Watch is calling for the government to drop its investigation, telling authorities to respect free expression and approve pending amendments to abolish the “defaming of religion” law.

“Nessma’s owners have every right to air this serious and provocative film,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “The government should be defending that right, just as it should defend the right of Tunisians to protest peacefully against Nessma.”

On September 23, Tunisia’s ad hoc advisory board, the High Commission for the Protection of the Objectives of the Revolution, approved a draft code that eliminates the offense of defamation of religion, as well as many other articles that violate the right to freedom of expression.

The interim government has yet to promulgate this change in the code.

This is not the first attack on free expression that has taken place since the ouster of President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali on January 14.

Film director Nouri Bouzid was bludgeoned on the head with a metal bar on April 18, shortly after giving an interview on a Tunisian radio station in which he called for a secular constitution and explained that his upcoming film defended civil liberties and criticized religious fundamentalism.

The dispute over Nessma has highlighted the struggle between religious conservatives and liberals over the direction of the country.

A rally was held on Sunday in furtherance of preserving the freedoms of the Tunisian people.

“This event does not defend Nessma TV in any way, this event defends the freedom of the individual,” the post says. “We do not want a dictatorship in the name of the sacred. We do not want to go from a police dictatorship to an Islamic dictatorship,” said organizers.

For more information, please see:

LA Times — Tunis crowds gather for anti-censorship march — 16 Oct. 2011

Tunisia Live — Protests Against Protests: Freedom of Speech and Anti-Censorship Rally in Downtown Tunis Today — 16 Oct. 2011

Eurasia Review — Tunisia: ‘Persepolis’ Screening Stirs Passions — 15 Oct. 2011

Macon — Protesters attack home of Tunis TV station head — 14 Oct. 2011

Human Rights Watch — Tunisia: Drop Criminal Investigation of TV Station for Airing Persepolis — 13 Oct. 2011

The Guardian — Islamist protesters attack Tunisian TV station over animated film Persepolis — 10 Oct. 2011

 

Message on News Reporting Disruption

 

Dear Impunity Watch reader,

As one of our many avid readers, you likely noticed that articles published between October 5th and 12th disappeared from the Impunity Watch website. I want to apologize for the disruption in our news service, ensure you that we will have all of the previously published articles re-published shortly, and inform you that service has been restored to normal. To avoid additional confusion regarding re-published articles, please note that we will include the original publication date in each re-published article.

The disruption occurred during the migration of the Impunity Watch website over to a new server. Although the brief disruption in service in regrettable, the change in server will allow our site to function more efficiently in the future because the new operators of the server will be able to provide more timely updates to our key applications.

Sorry again for the disruption in service and thank you for your patience and understanding. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns regarding this or any other matters.

Thank you for your continued support in the fight against impunity.

Your truly,

Warren Popp
Editor-in-Chief
wrpopp@syr.edu

ARGENTINEAN CASE IN THE FINAL PHASE OF TESTIMONY MAY FINALLY PROVE KIDNAPPINGS AND MURDERS OF THE DIRTY WAR

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — A trial in Argentina that began in late February of this year and is now in its final phase of testimony may finally prove the strategic  plan to carry out approximately 500 baby abductions adopted by the nation’s military leaders during Argentina’s Dirty War.

Victoria Montenegro was abducted as a newborn during Argentina's Dirty War. (Photo Courtesy of The New York Times).
Victoria Montenegro was abducted as a newborn during Argentina's Dirty War. (Photo Courtesy of The New York Times).

The recent Dirty War trials are uncovering a painful time in Argentina’s history, a period of military dictatorship rule between 1976 and 1983 when around 500 babies were abducted and thousands of left-wing activists were murdered at the hands of the government. Efforts to locate the “disappeared” from this period have been on going by the grandmothers (”las abuelas de Plaza de Mayo”) and the now adult children of those murdered who question their own identity.

One of the accused in the case is Jorge Rafael Videla. Videla headed the military during Argentina’s dictatorship and is now being accused of spearheading the kidnapping operation which redistributed babies from left-wing mothers to military officials. He is among the 11 officials on trial for 35 acts of “illegal appropriation of minors.”

Victoria Montenegro, 35, is a daughter of the Dirty War who was abducted by a military colonel when she was a newborn. She was raised by Lt. Col. Hernán Tetzlaff, the man who killed her biological parents. Although Tetzlaff confessed to the murder in 2000, it was not until after her recent testimony in trial that Montenegro was finally able to accept the truth and shed the name he had given her.

Like many others who were abducted as babies, Montenegro was constantly lied to by her military parents and received a strong ideological education. “I grew up thinking that in Argentina there had been a war, and that our soldiers had gone to war to guarantee the democracy,” she stated. “And that there were no disappeared people, that it was all a lie.”

Thanks to more government support, advanced technology and a growing genetic data bank, the total number of recoveries as of August is 105.

The trial is shedding light on many mysteries surrounding the Dirty War, including a possible connection between some Dirty War crimes and the Argentinean Catholic Church which supported the military government at the time. Church officials in Argentina and at the Vatican have declined to comment on allegations of possible involvement.

 

For further information, please see;

 

The New York Times – Daughter of ‘Dirty War,’ Raised by Man Who Killed Her Parents – 08 October 2011

CNN – Argentina Presses Forward with Human Rights Trials – 06 October 2011

Reuters – Argentina Nixes Extradition in 1970s French Nun Case – 04 October 2011

The Guardian– Child of Argentina’s ‘Disappeared’ Fights for Right to Keep Adoptive Name – 23 September 2011

 

CHILEAN PRESIDENT SEBASTIAN PINERA SEEKS TO CRIMINALIZE STUDENT PROTESTS THROUGH NEW LEGISLATION

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

SANTIAGO, Chile — Chilean President Sebastian Pinera and Interior Minister Rodrigo Hinzpeter signed a legislative proposal on Sunday that could potentially put a halt to the student and teacher led protests that have paralyzed high schools and universities around the country for over five months.

Student and teacher protests continue in Chile despite threats of criminal sanctions. (Photo Courtesy of Huffington Post)

The legislation seeks to reform article 269 of the Penal Code by criminalizing illegal occupation or invasion of buildings and increasing penalties for public disorder, including the mistreatment of policemen, from 541 days to three years in jail. If approved, the new law will also force television channels to release tape used to record the protests so that authorities can identify and sanction individual protestors.

According to the Chilean government, students protests have incited violence, theft and have caused mass amounts of damage to property. “He that seeks to undermine peace and stability of the people, or damages public or private property will find this a tough legislation,” Pinera warned.

Student leaders, however, remain undeterred and have called for the continuation of street and campus protests this week after failed negotiations with the Chilean government over education reform on Wednesday.

Students are urging the government to increase taxes on the wealthy and fund free and high quality education for all but Pinera remains that “Nothing is free in life,” and that only the very poor will receive federal grants. After the United States, Chile ranks second in most expensive college tuitions in the Western Hemisphere.

Behind the student movement is Camila Vallejo, a 23-year-old geography student who has become an international celebrity with twice as many twitter followers as Pinera. Her quick notoriety on twitter has enabled her to direct the protests, rally student groups and even cast doubt on some of Pinera’s statements through twitter messages.

In response to Pinera’s claim that his 7 percent increase in education funding for 2012 was the biggest in Chilean history, Vallejo tweeted “How can this be an extraordinary effort if in 2011 it increased 13 percent, in 2009 15 percent and in 2008 24 percent?”

Vallejo told Associated Press on Wednesday that she is exhausted and would like to step down for a bit but feels obligated to stay and continue leading the fight. She believes that Pinera’s recent threat to criminalize the student protests shows that he wants to sabotage talks just as they begin.

Student leaders will take a vote on October 8 to decide whether to continue negotiation talks with the Chilean government.

For further information, please see:

Business Week – Chilean Students Prepare March After Government Talks Break Down– 06 October 2011

Associated Press – Pressure Grows As Chile Student Leader Opens Talks – 05 October  2011

Huffington Post – Chile Education Protests: Talks With Government Break Off – 05 October 2011

Latin News – Pinera Tries to Play Hardball – 03 October 2011

Santiago Times – Chilean Government to Criminalize School Seizures – 03 October 2011