Uncategorized

Chilean Commission Uncovers Nearly 10,000 More Victims of Augusto Pinochet’s Rule

By Ryan T. Elliott
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America/Oceania

SANTIAGO, Chile— A report released last week by a Chilean commission found that there were many more victims under Pinochet’s rule than previously suspected or documented. In fact, the commission’s director, Maria Luisa Sepulveda, said the commission had identified an additional 9,800 people who had been held as political prisoners and tortured. This brings the total of people killed, tortured or imprisoned for political reasons to 40,018.

General Augusto Pinochet
General Augusto Pinochet (Photo Courtesy of Political Pathologies)

As part of this most recent report, the commission examined 32,000 new claims of human rights abuses over the past year and a half. In order to be recognized as a victim during Pinochet’s rule, the person must have been: (1) detained or tortured for political reasons by agents of the state or people at its service; (2) victims of forced disappearances or been executed for political reasons by agents of the state or people at its service; (3) or been kidnapped or been the victims of assassination attempts for political reasons.

During the latter part of the Cold War, and Chile’s 1970 presidential election, the United States became more and more troubled at the prospect of a Socialist by the name of Salvador Allende who seemed likely to prevail in the upcoming election. This fear was rooted, among other things, in Allende’s economic plan, which involved the nationalization of the country’s industry, including U.S.-owned companies.

Not much of this was definitively known until 2000 when the CIA released a document entitled “CIA Activities in Chile,” which outlined the CIA’s role in trying to deter and ultimately prevent Allende from becoming Chile’s next president. Despite their effort, when the ballots were cast and counted, the CIA had failed and Salvador Allende succeeded.

On September 11th 1973 a bloody coup, supported by the United States, took place. The Chilean presidential palace, La Moneda, had been bombed and Allende had subsequently committed suicide. Shortly after the bombing, the military appeared on television with General Pinochet, the newly appointed army commander.

While a majority in Chile’s Congress supported the coup, many Chileans believed that the army would restore social and economic order and then hold democratic elections. With the backing of the army, however, Pinochet did not secure democratic elections, but a dictatorship. In short order, Congress was dissolved, political parties were banned, and opposition leaders were exiled. While many of Allende’s nationalization efforts were thwarted, most Chileans watched in horror as a democracy that stretched back to the 1930s faced a swift death at the hands of Pinochet

For seventeen years, Pinochet ruled, and the violence he let loose was unprecedented in Chile. Pinochet’s first order of business involved capturing, torturing and killing thousands of Allende supporters across Chile. Government-sponsored reports, including the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture Report, found that 3,200 people were murdered under his dictatorship, half of them in the first year. Some 30,000 more were tortured. These reports were much more than attempts at unearthing an unsavory past, it was hoped that they would give Chile an opportunity to reach some sort of reconciliation with its past. However, reconciliation was made difficult by the fact that Pinochet, as a life long head of state, was never brought to justice.

As a result of the recently released report, survivors and victims of abuses under Pinochet will receive a lifetime pension of about $260.00 a month. Meanwhile, relatives of those killed receive about triple that amount. Victims are also entitled to health, education and housing benefits. In sum the government will have to increase its compensation by roughly $123 million a year to victims.

The report was presented to the current Chilean President, Sebastian Pinera, earlier this week at his presidential palace. Neither the details of the kind of abuses faced by the victims nor the names of the victims were released, however. These details are expected to remain confidential for the next fifty years.

This is the fourth report of its kind examining the human rights abuses under Pinochet since 1990. The report doesn’t alter the material facts known about the abuses during Pinochet’s rule, but it does change what is known about the number of abuses during this era, and it is yet another step toward accurately capturing this historical period of Chile.

While the commission has completed its work, the investigation is far from over as there are still hundreds of cases pending before Chilean courts.

For more information, please see:

Chile recognizes 9800 More Victims — August 18, 2011

Chile recognizes 9800 More Victims — August 18, 2011

Chile recognizes 9,800 more Pinochet victims – August 18, 20011

Chile recognizes 9,800 more victims of Pinochet’s rule — August, 2011

After Pinochet — December 13, 2006

Augusto Pinochet – December 13, 2006

Augusto Pinochet: The passing of a tyrant – December 13, 2006

Pinochet’s legacy to Chile: The reckoning – September 16, 1999

Human Rights Chief Condemns European Participation in U.S. Counter-Terrorism Efforts

By Alexandra Halsey-Storch
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

BRUSSELS, Belgium – On September 1, Thomas Hammarberg, the Swedish Diplomat and Commissioner for Human Rights at the Council of Europe, released a statement condemning European nations for aiding and committing countless crimes against humanity over the past ten years in collaboration with the United States and its War on Terror.

Thomas Hammarberg, Curtesy of World Peoples Blog
Thomas Hammarberg (Courtesy of World People's Blog).

He accused several EU nations, including Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Sweden, and Britain for permitting, protecting and participating in the United States’s Central Intelligence Agency’s (“CIA”) Rendition, Detention and Interrogation Program (“RDI”), which has deeply violated the systems of justice and human rights protection.  There is “no doubt,” Hammarberg said, “that all 3 elements of this program have entailed systematic violations of human rights.”

For example, in June 2006, the Council of Europe released a report discussing the “unlawful inter-state transfers of detainees” by European nations bound by the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture. The report claimed that the United States had operated under the precept that combating terrorism was outside the scope of issues governed by international criminal laws and the Geneva Convention. Using new terminology and concepts like “enemy combatant” and “rendition,” the United States, with the help of European counterparts, was thereby able to generate a “spider’s web” of disappearances, secret detentions, and otherwise illegal inter-state transfers of detainees that run contrary to international principals of human rights.

The report determined that the spider’s web has included a “world-wide network of secret detentions on CIA ‘black cites’ and in military or naval installations.” Furthermore, some Council of Europe member States “knowingly colluded with the United States to carry out these unlawful operations” while some “tolerated them or simply turned a blind eye.” Regardless of the type of participation, “all involved nations have gone to great lengths to ensure that such operations remain secret and protected from effective national or international security.”

Being held at the “black cites,” kept the suspects “outside the reach of any justice system and rendered them vulnerable to ill-treatment,” said Hammarberg. The February 14, 2007 report issued by the International Committee of the Red Cross, details, in great depth, the treatment of “high value detainees” held by the CIA. Specifically, when initially captured, high value detainees were photographed with and without clothing, subjected to evasive body cavity checks (including rectal examinations), and thereafter shackled and blindfolded — in some instances so tightly that severe wounds resulted.

Hammarberg said that European governments were “deeply complicit” in U.S. counterterrorism strategies, including the pervasive torture techniques meant to coerce cooperation during interrogations. Often, detainees were not permitted to use the toilet and in some circumstances were forced to urinate or defecate into a diaper or on themselves.  Interrogation methods included suffocation by water, prolonged stress standing (naked, with arms extended and chained above one’s head for two to three days at a time), beating and kicking, confinement in a box, which severely restricted movement, prolonged nudity, sleep deprivation, exposure to cold temperatures, and starvation.

As Hammarberg noted, it is evident that as we approach the ten-year anniversary of the devastating 9/11 attacks it is important to pay respect to those who lost their loved ones, but also crucial to reflect and analyze “whether the official responses to the attacks have been proper and effective.” In closing, he iterated that while “Europe has granted effective impunity to those who committed crimes in implementing the rendition policy” a “rethink is required to prevent this misjudged and failed counterterrorism approach from having a sad legacy of injustice.”

For more information, please see:

The Huffington Post – Rights Chief Slams EU for Cooperation in U.S. Renditions – 1 September 2011

International Committee of the Red Cross – ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody – 14 February 2007

The Council of Europe – Alleged Secret detentions and un-lawful interstate transfers of detainees involving Council of Europe member states – 12 June 2006

Bolivian Ex-officials sentenced for their role in the Black October deaths

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America


LA PAZ, Bolivia – Bolivia’s Supreme court of Justice convicted five ex-military commanders of genocide on Tuesday for their role in the deaths of at least 64 unarmed civilians in an army crackdown during an October 2003 riot.


2003 riot sparked by a government plan to export natural gas through a proposed pipeline to Chile. (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera)
2003 riot sparked by a government plan to export natural gas through a pipeline to Chile. (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera).

The October 2003 riot, also known as “Black October,” was sparked by public outrage after the Bolivian government announced its plans to export Bolivia’s natural gas through a pipeline into Chile. Protestors who were fueled by years of anger over poverty and political marginalization, took to the streets of El Alto with sticks and rocks to demonstrate their disapproval.


Authorized by former president Sanchez de Lozada, soldiers opened fire on the protestors, killing 64 and wounding approximately 405. Among those killed were women and children. Sanchez claimed the use of force was justified because the protestors had cut off food and fuel supply to La Paz.


On Tuesday, three of the five former military officials responsible for ordering the crackdown, were each given 10 years in prison. The other two higher ranked military officials,  Roberto Claros, a former armed forces chief, and Juan Veliz, a former army commander, were each given 15-year sentences.


Also convicted of complicity in the killings were two former environment and labor Cabinet ministers, Erick Reyes Villa and Adalberto Kuajara, who were each given three year sentences.

Gonzalo Rocabado, one of the former military officials who received a 10-year sentence, stated that the trial was misguided because it was “a trial against the armed forces that followed the law.”


Family and friends of the victims of Black October cried out of mixed emotions at the verdict; some cried out of anger that the prison sentences were too short. Many had held a vigil outside the court house in Sucre for two months prior to the trial.


Indicted in the case but not tried because of Bolivia’s absentia law include Sanchez and Carlos Sanzhez Berzain, a former defense minister.


Both Sanchez and Berzain were forced into exile after the riot and currently reside in Florida. Bolivia has sought their extradition but strained relations between the U.S. and Bolivia may hinder this request.


For more information, please see:


Fox News – 5 Military Officers Convicted of Genocide in Bolivia; Two Ministers Guilty of Complicity – 31 August 2011

AljazeeraBolivia officers convicted over 2003 massacre – 31 August 2011

New York Times – Bolivia: 5 Officers Guilty of Genocide – 30 August 2011

Associated Press – Ex-military chiefs convicted for Bolivia crackdown – 30 August 2011

No Plans to Evacuate NYC Prisoners before Deadly Hurricane Strikes

by Warren Popp
Impunity Watch Editor-in-Chief

NEW YORK, NY – According to several news outlets, the New York City Department of Corrections does not have an evacuation plan for the approximately 12,000 prisoners held at Rikers Island, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg clearly stated at a news conference on Friday that “We are not evacuating Rikers Island.”

Aeriel view of Rikers Island (Photo Courtesy of Julia Robertson, AP).
Aeriel view of Rikers Island (Photo Courtesy of Julia Robertson, AP).

These revelations have revived stories of prisoners that were not evacuated when hurricane Katrina struck Louisiana in 2005.  Solitary Watch quoted the following excerpt from an American Civil Liberties Union Report:

[A] culture of neglect was evident in the days before Katrina, when the sheriff declared that the prisoners would remain “where they belong,” despite the mayor’s decision to declare the city’s first-ever mandatory evacuation. OPP even accepted prisoners, including juveniles as young as 10, from other facilities to ride out the storm.

As floodwaters rose in the OPP buildings, power was lost, and entire buildings were plunged into darkness. Deputies left their posts wholesale, leaving behind prisoners in locked cells, some standing in sewage-tainted water up to their chests…

Prisoners went days without food, water and ventilation, and deputies admit that they received no emergency training and were entirely unaware of any evacuation plan. Even some prison guards were left locked in at their posts to fend for themselves, unable to provide assistance to prisoners in need.

Further heightening the level of concern and indignation amongst critics, the prisoners housed at Rikers Island include juveniles, a large number of mentally ill persons, and even pre-trial detainees, with the latter group not convicted of any crimes. Also adding to the concerns is that more that three-fourths of the island is built on a landfill, which is believed to be more vulnerable to natural disasters.

The Office of the Mayor has responded to criticisms by asserting that the prisoners safety is not being compromised, and that no part of Rikers Island is in Zone A (the mandatory evacuation area). The Wall Street Journal quotes the Mayor’s spokesman as saying, “[w]e are focused on the areas where real dangers exist.” However, Rikers Island is reportedly one of the only islands in the area that is not listed in any of the areas zoned for evacuation.

The Office of the Mayor reasoned that the prisoners do not need to be evacuated because the island, like other islands in New York City, does not actually touch the Atlantic Ocean.  The Mayor’s spokesperson was also quoted as saying that the jail is able to sustain itself and is “prepared to operate and care for inmates in extended emergency conditions,” with a full staff to remain on the island.

These words of reassurance have done little to satisfy those concerned about the plight of the Rikers Island prisoners.  The Executive Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights said that “[i]t is appalling that the City administration is abandoning the men and women at Rikers even after the lessons of hurricane Katrina.”  He called on the Mayor to “take appropriate action immediately to protect the life and safety of everyone confined at Rikers Island and all vulnerable corrections facilities in New York City. Their lives should not be treated as less valuable than those of other New Yorkers.”

For more information, please see:

Center for Constitutional Rights – CCR Says NYC Must Act Immediately to Protect Prisoners at Rikers Island from Hurricane Irene – 27 August 2011

Mother Jones – Rikers Island Prisoners Left Behind to Face Irene – 27 August 2011

New York Magazine – No Evacuation for Rikers Island [Updated] – 27 August 2011

Wall Street Journal – No Evacuation Planned at Rikers Island – 27 August 2011

Solitary Watch – Locked Up and Left Behind: Hurricane Irene and the Prisoners on New York’s Rikers Island – 26 August 2011

AS TENSIONS BETWEEN GAZA AND ISRAEL FLARE UP AND DOWN, CIVILIANS PAY THE TOLL

By Adom M. Cooper
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip–Fresh strokes in the ongoing conflict between the Israel and Palestine has caught the attention and concern of the international community. With the current volatile situations in other countries of the region taking center stage, such as Libya and Syria, the timeless conflict has pushed its way back to the headlines after drifting somewhat into the background.

An Israeli tank is positioned near the southern Israel kilbuttz of Nahal Oz.(Photo Courtesy of CNN)
An Israeli tank is positioned near the southern Israel kilbuttz of Nahal Oz.(Photo Courtesy of CNN)

A third Israeli raid crushed a military training camp in the Gaza Strip after rockets fired from Gaza fell in southern Israeli on the fourth day of a continued cross-border conflict that has claimed the lives of 30 individuals.

Al-Jazeera’s Safwat Kahlout reported that at least nine Palestinians, including a brutally injured 13-year-old boy, were wounded on Sunday from Israeli drones and F-16 fighter jet attacks. The Israeli attacked targeted a Hamas police station and a military training camp belonging to the al-Ahrar movement.

On 20 August 2011, Hamas announced that it was formally ending its two-year truce with Israel. This was the first time in months that Hamas had openly declared its involvement in rocket attacks against Israel, since observing the de facto truce since the end of a three-week offensive in January 2009.

Al-Jazeera correspondent Cal Perry shared these sentiments concerning Hamas involvement.

“Hamas has called off the ceasefire that was in place with Israel, largely due to the violence and the continued strikes that we see from Israeli aircraft, killing at least 15 Palestinians. They do blame Hamas whenever anything originated from Gaza, be it a rocket attack from the south-we have seen 70 of those since Thursday-or an attack like we saw from southern Israel.”

Israeli army officials reported that at least 12 rockets fired from Gaza fell in southern Israel and hit an empty school, not creating any serious injuries. Israeli ministers held an emergency meeting on Saturday night to discuss the violence after an Israeli man was killed that evening by a rocket strike in the southern city of Beersheba. According to the AFP news agency, the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) has claimed responsibility for the Beersheba attack. PRC is a faction in Gaza that is traditionally loyal to Hamas.

Israeli aerial attacks on Gaza have claimed the lives of at least 15 people, including gunmen and five civilians, three of them children. Israeli officials blamed the attack on Palestinian fighters who had entered southern Israel from Gaza through Egypt.

The Arab League implored the international community to “pressure the Israeli occupation authorities to put an immediate end to this assault,” after holding emergency talks in Cairo, Egypt on Sunday.

“The Arab League calls on the UNSC to assume its responsibilities and take quick steps to halt this brutal assault.”

As recently as 23 August, Palestinian fighters in the Gaza Strip fired rockets into southern Israel overnight, according to Israeli police. Hamas officials said that Palestinian factions and Israel had agreed to observe a ceasefire after three days of border skirmishes. Ghazi Hamad, Hamas’ deputy foreign minister, has confirmed the reported ceasefire to Al-Jazeera, detailing that both sides reached an informal ceasefire through Egyptian and UN mediation.

“We have temporarily stopped firing rockets at Israel according to the national consensus.”

For more information, please see:

BBC-Israel and Hamas agree Gaza truce, reports say-23 August 2011

Al-Jazeera-Hamas says Gaza ceasefire agreed-22 August 2011

Ahram-Gaza militants agree to halt fire on Israel-22 August 2011

NYT-Efforts Seek to Restore Calm Between Israel and Hamas-21 August 2011

CNN-Rockets kill 1 in Israel; Hamas military wing ends truce-20 August 2011