Uncategorized

Three Executed in Iran for Sodomy

By Tyler Yates
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

AHVAZ, Iran — Last Sunday morning, three men were executed by Iran’s judiciary for sodomy.  They were put to death by hanging in the south western city of Ahvaz at Karoun prison.

Preparations made for a public hanging like the one used against three men convicted of sodomy (Photo courtesy of Queer Landia).
Preparations made for a public hanging like the one used against three men convicted of sodomy (Photo courtesy of Queer Landia).

A total of six individuals were executed on Sunday.  Two had been convicted for robbery and rape, and a third had been convicted of drug trafficking.  The prosecutor announced that the other three men were convicted of “lavat,” the phrase used in Islamic law for sodomy.  The official announcement did not reveal the names of the men who were executed only their initials.

This case is somewhat unusual because normally when such cases come before Iranian courts the charges involve acts such as sexual assault and rape — crimes that involve an element of force rather than consensual sex between willing parties.

These executions revolve around sections 108 and 110 of the Iranian penal code.  Section 108 defines sodomy a crime using Iran’s interpretation of Sharia law, and under section 110 the penalty for commission of the crime is death.  Prior executions quoting the penal code have referred to “lavat leh onf, “ or sodomy by coercion.

It is not unusual for Iran to frame sodomy cases as containing elements of coercion to make the executions more legitimate in the eyes of the public, and to avoid an international outcry.

In 2005, Iran was condemned for its execution of two teenagers who were publicly hanged from a crane in the city of Mashad.  Human rights groups claimed that the two were executed for having a consensual sexual relationship, but the offical charges were “lavat leh onf.”

Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, a researcher at Iran Human Rights, notes that “this case is the only one in recent years where the only basis for the death sentence has been a sexual relationship between two men, with reference to the articles 108 and 110 of the Islamic Penal Code.”

In 2007, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed that there were no gay people in Iran, implying that homosexuality is a western “phenomenon.”  This attitude in Iran has been a major motivator for keeping any public references to homosexuality at a minimum.

It is very hard to confirm executions of gay men and women inside of Iran.  Prosecutors often only give small amounts of information about the killings, and families are reluctant to release information about executed family members and loved ones because of the cultural stigma attached to homosexuality.

Iran is run under a strict interpretation of Sharia law, and it remains one of the world’s largest executors.  Just this year, Iran has executed over 180 people.  Ahvaz has the highest rate of executions in Iran, and has gained some notoriety for the secret hangings carried out in Karoun prison.

For more information, please see:

The Independent Iran executes three men for sodomy — 7 Sept 2011

International Business Times — Iran Execution:  Three Men Hanged for Being Gay, Convicted of Sodomy — 7 Sept 2011

Huffington Post — Three Men Hanged For Having Gay Sex In Iran: Reports – 6 Sep 2011

Miami Herald — Three men executed for sodomy convictions, reports Iran Human Rights website — 5 Sept 2011

Iran Human Rights — Three men were executed convicted of sodomy — 5 Sept 2011

Chilean Commission Uncovers Nearly 10,000 More Victims of Augusto Pinochet’s Rule

By Ryan T. Elliott
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America/Oceania

SANTIAGO, Chile— A report released last week by a Chilean commission found that there were many more victims under Pinochet’s rule than previously suspected or documented. In fact, the commission’s director, Maria Luisa Sepulveda, said the commission had identified an additional 9,800 people who had been held as political prisoners and tortured. This brings the total of people killed, tortured or imprisoned for political reasons to 40,018.

General Augusto Pinochet
General Augusto Pinochet (Photo Courtesy of Political Pathologies)

As part of this most recent report, the commission examined 32,000 new claims of human rights abuses over the past year and a half. In order to be recognized as a victim during Pinochet’s rule, the person must have been: (1) detained or tortured for political reasons by agents of the state or people at its service; (2) victims of forced disappearances or been executed for political reasons by agents of the state or people at its service; (3) or been kidnapped or been the victims of assassination attempts for political reasons.

During the latter part of the Cold War, and Chile’s 1970 presidential election, the United States became more and more troubled at the prospect of a Socialist by the name of Salvador Allende who seemed likely to prevail in the upcoming election. This fear was rooted, among other things, in Allende’s economic plan, which involved the nationalization of the country’s industry, including U.S.-owned companies.

Not much of this was definitively known until 2000 when the CIA released a document entitled “CIA Activities in Chile,” which outlined the CIA’s role in trying to deter and ultimately prevent Allende from becoming Chile’s next president. Despite their effort, when the ballots were cast and counted, the CIA had failed and Salvador Allende succeeded.

On September 11th 1973 a bloody coup, supported by the United States, took place. The Chilean presidential palace, La Moneda, had been bombed and Allende had subsequently committed suicide. Shortly after the bombing, the military appeared on television with General Pinochet, the newly appointed army commander.

While a majority in Chile’s Congress supported the coup, many Chileans believed that the army would restore social and economic order and then hold democratic elections. With the backing of the army, however, Pinochet did not secure democratic elections, but a dictatorship. In short order, Congress was dissolved, political parties were banned, and opposition leaders were exiled. While many of Allende’s nationalization efforts were thwarted, most Chileans watched in horror as a democracy that stretched back to the 1930s faced a swift death at the hands of Pinochet

For seventeen years, Pinochet ruled, and the violence he let loose was unprecedented in Chile. Pinochet’s first order of business involved capturing, torturing and killing thousands of Allende supporters across Chile. Government-sponsored reports, including the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture Report, found that 3,200 people were murdered under his dictatorship, half of them in the first year. Some 30,000 more were tortured. These reports were much more than attempts at unearthing an unsavory past, it was hoped that they would give Chile an opportunity to reach some sort of reconciliation with its past. However, reconciliation was made difficult by the fact that Pinochet, as a life long head of state, was never brought to justice.

As a result of the recently released report, survivors and victims of abuses under Pinochet will receive a lifetime pension of about $260.00 a month. Meanwhile, relatives of those killed receive about triple that amount. Victims are also entitled to health, education and housing benefits. In sum the government will have to increase its compensation by roughly $123 million a year to victims.

The report was presented to the current Chilean President, Sebastian Pinera, earlier this week at his presidential palace. Neither the details of the kind of abuses faced by the victims nor the names of the victims were released, however. These details are expected to remain confidential for the next fifty years.

This is the fourth report of its kind examining the human rights abuses under Pinochet since 1990. The report doesn’t alter the material facts known about the abuses during Pinochet’s rule, but it does change what is known about the number of abuses during this era, and it is yet another step toward accurately capturing this historical period of Chile.

While the commission has completed its work, the investigation is far from over as there are still hundreds of cases pending before Chilean courts.

For more information, please see:

Chile recognizes 9800 More Victims — August 18, 2011

Chile recognizes 9800 More Victims — August 18, 2011

Chile recognizes 9,800 more Pinochet victims – August 18, 20011

Chile recognizes 9,800 more victims of Pinochet’s rule — August, 2011

After Pinochet — December 13, 2006

Augusto Pinochet – December 13, 2006

Augusto Pinochet: The passing of a tyrant – December 13, 2006

Pinochet’s legacy to Chile: The reckoning – September 16, 1999

Human Rights Chief Condemns European Participation in U.S. Counter-Terrorism Efforts

By Alexandra Halsey-Storch
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

BRUSSELS, Belgium – On September 1, Thomas Hammarberg, the Swedish Diplomat and Commissioner for Human Rights at the Council of Europe, released a statement condemning European nations for aiding and committing countless crimes against humanity over the past ten years in collaboration with the United States and its War on Terror.

Thomas Hammarberg, Curtesy of World Peoples Blog
Thomas Hammarberg (Courtesy of World People's Blog).

He accused several EU nations, including Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Sweden, and Britain for permitting, protecting and participating in the United States’s Central Intelligence Agency’s (“CIA”) Rendition, Detention and Interrogation Program (“RDI”), which has deeply violated the systems of justice and human rights protection.  There is “no doubt,” Hammarberg said, “that all 3 elements of this program have entailed systematic violations of human rights.”

For example, in June 2006, the Council of Europe released a report discussing the “unlawful inter-state transfers of detainees” by European nations bound by the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture. The report claimed that the United States had operated under the precept that combating terrorism was outside the scope of issues governed by international criminal laws and the Geneva Convention. Using new terminology and concepts like “enemy combatant” and “rendition,” the United States, with the help of European counterparts, was thereby able to generate a “spider’s web” of disappearances, secret detentions, and otherwise illegal inter-state transfers of detainees that run contrary to international principals of human rights.

The report determined that the spider’s web has included a “world-wide network of secret detentions on CIA ‘black cites’ and in military or naval installations.” Furthermore, some Council of Europe member States “knowingly colluded with the United States to carry out these unlawful operations” while some “tolerated them or simply turned a blind eye.” Regardless of the type of participation, “all involved nations have gone to great lengths to ensure that such operations remain secret and protected from effective national or international security.”

Being held at the “black cites,” kept the suspects “outside the reach of any justice system and rendered them vulnerable to ill-treatment,” said Hammarberg. The February 14, 2007 report issued by the International Committee of the Red Cross, details, in great depth, the treatment of “high value detainees” held by the CIA. Specifically, when initially captured, high value detainees were photographed with and without clothing, subjected to evasive body cavity checks (including rectal examinations), and thereafter shackled and blindfolded — in some instances so tightly that severe wounds resulted.

Hammarberg said that European governments were “deeply complicit” in U.S. counterterrorism strategies, including the pervasive torture techniques meant to coerce cooperation during interrogations. Often, detainees were not permitted to use the toilet and in some circumstances were forced to urinate or defecate into a diaper or on themselves.  Interrogation methods included suffocation by water, prolonged stress standing (naked, with arms extended and chained above one’s head for two to three days at a time), beating and kicking, confinement in a box, which severely restricted movement, prolonged nudity, sleep deprivation, exposure to cold temperatures, and starvation.

As Hammarberg noted, it is evident that as we approach the ten-year anniversary of the devastating 9/11 attacks it is important to pay respect to those who lost their loved ones, but also crucial to reflect and analyze “whether the official responses to the attacks have been proper and effective.” In closing, he iterated that while “Europe has granted effective impunity to those who committed crimes in implementing the rendition policy” a “rethink is required to prevent this misjudged and failed counterterrorism approach from having a sad legacy of injustice.”

For more information, please see:

The Huffington Post – Rights Chief Slams EU for Cooperation in U.S. Renditions – 1 September 2011

International Committee of the Red Cross – ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody – 14 February 2007

The Council of Europe – Alleged Secret detentions and un-lawful interstate transfers of detainees involving Council of Europe member states – 12 June 2006

Bolivian Ex-officials sentenced for their role in the Black October deaths

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America


LA PAZ, Bolivia – Bolivia’s Supreme court of Justice convicted five ex-military commanders of genocide on Tuesday for their role in the deaths of at least 64 unarmed civilians in an army crackdown during an October 2003 riot.


2003 riot sparked by a government plan to export natural gas through a proposed pipeline to Chile. (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera)
2003 riot sparked by a government plan to export natural gas through a pipeline to Chile. (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera).

The October 2003 riot, also known as “Black October,” was sparked by public outrage after the Bolivian government announced its plans to export Bolivia’s natural gas through a pipeline into Chile. Protestors who were fueled by years of anger over poverty and political marginalization, took to the streets of El Alto with sticks and rocks to demonstrate their disapproval.


Authorized by former president Sanchez de Lozada, soldiers opened fire on the protestors, killing 64 and wounding approximately 405. Among those killed were women and children. Sanchez claimed the use of force was justified because the protestors had cut off food and fuel supply to La Paz.


On Tuesday, three of the five former military officials responsible for ordering the crackdown, were each given 10 years in prison. The other two higher ranked military officials,  Roberto Claros, a former armed forces chief, and Juan Veliz, a former army commander, were each given 15-year sentences.


Also convicted of complicity in the killings were two former environment and labor Cabinet ministers, Erick Reyes Villa and Adalberto Kuajara, who were each given three year sentences.

Gonzalo Rocabado, one of the former military officials who received a 10-year sentence, stated that the trial was misguided because it was “a trial against the armed forces that followed the law.”


Family and friends of the victims of Black October cried out of mixed emotions at the verdict; some cried out of anger that the prison sentences were too short. Many had held a vigil outside the court house in Sucre for two months prior to the trial.


Indicted in the case but not tried because of Bolivia’s absentia law include Sanchez and Carlos Sanzhez Berzain, a former defense minister.


Both Sanchez and Berzain were forced into exile after the riot and currently reside in Florida. Bolivia has sought their extradition but strained relations between the U.S. and Bolivia may hinder this request.


For more information, please see:


Fox News – 5 Military Officers Convicted of Genocide in Bolivia; Two Ministers Guilty of Complicity – 31 August 2011

AljazeeraBolivia officers convicted over 2003 massacre – 31 August 2011

New York Times – Bolivia: 5 Officers Guilty of Genocide – 30 August 2011

Associated Press – Ex-military chiefs convicted for Bolivia crackdown – 30 August 2011

No Plans to Evacuate NYC Prisoners before Deadly Hurricane Strikes

by Warren Popp
Impunity Watch Editor-in-Chief

NEW YORK, NY – According to several news outlets, the New York City Department of Corrections does not have an evacuation plan for the approximately 12,000 prisoners held at Rikers Island, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg clearly stated at a news conference on Friday that “We are not evacuating Rikers Island.”

Aeriel view of Rikers Island (Photo Courtesy of Julia Robertson, AP).
Aeriel view of Rikers Island (Photo Courtesy of Julia Robertson, AP).

These revelations have revived stories of prisoners that were not evacuated when hurricane Katrina struck Louisiana in 2005.  Solitary Watch quoted the following excerpt from an American Civil Liberties Union Report:

[A] culture of neglect was evident in the days before Katrina, when the sheriff declared that the prisoners would remain “where they belong,” despite the mayor’s decision to declare the city’s first-ever mandatory evacuation. OPP even accepted prisoners, including juveniles as young as 10, from other facilities to ride out the storm.

As floodwaters rose in the OPP buildings, power was lost, and entire buildings were plunged into darkness. Deputies left their posts wholesale, leaving behind prisoners in locked cells, some standing in sewage-tainted water up to their chests…

Prisoners went days without food, water and ventilation, and deputies admit that they received no emergency training and were entirely unaware of any evacuation plan. Even some prison guards were left locked in at their posts to fend for themselves, unable to provide assistance to prisoners in need.

Further heightening the level of concern and indignation amongst critics, the prisoners housed at Rikers Island include juveniles, a large number of mentally ill persons, and even pre-trial detainees, with the latter group not convicted of any crimes. Also adding to the concerns is that more that three-fourths of the island is built on a landfill, which is believed to be more vulnerable to natural disasters.

The Office of the Mayor has responded to criticisms by asserting that the prisoners safety is not being compromised, and that no part of Rikers Island is in Zone A (the mandatory evacuation area). The Wall Street Journal quotes the Mayor’s spokesman as saying, “[w]e are focused on the areas where real dangers exist.” However, Rikers Island is reportedly one of the only islands in the area that is not listed in any of the areas zoned for evacuation.

The Office of the Mayor reasoned that the prisoners do not need to be evacuated because the island, like other islands in New York City, does not actually touch the Atlantic Ocean.  The Mayor’s spokesperson was also quoted as saying that the jail is able to sustain itself and is “prepared to operate and care for inmates in extended emergency conditions,” with a full staff to remain on the island.

These words of reassurance have done little to satisfy those concerned about the plight of the Rikers Island prisoners.  The Executive Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights said that “[i]t is appalling that the City administration is abandoning the men and women at Rikers even after the lessons of hurricane Katrina.”  He called on the Mayor to “take appropriate action immediately to protect the life and safety of everyone confined at Rikers Island and all vulnerable corrections facilities in New York City. Their lives should not be treated as less valuable than those of other New Yorkers.”

For more information, please see:

Center for Constitutional Rights – CCR Says NYC Must Act Immediately to Protect Prisoners at Rikers Island from Hurricane Irene – 27 August 2011

Mother Jones – Rikers Island Prisoners Left Behind to Face Irene – 27 August 2011

New York Magazine – No Evacuation for Rikers Island [Updated] – 27 August 2011

Wall Street Journal – No Evacuation Planned at Rikers Island – 27 August 2011

Solitary Watch – Locked Up and Left Behind: Hurricane Irene and the Prisoners on New York’s Rikers Island – 26 August 2011