By Brenda Lopez Romero
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

Washington, D.C. – Six months after an all-white jury in Schuylkill County acquitted two young men of aggravated assault and one of murder of Luis Ramirez, the federal government indicted five people related to Mr. Ramirez’s case.

Mr. Ramirez was beaten into a coma that led to his death that was found to be racially motivated in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania in July 2008. The federal government brought charges for hate crimes, obstruction of justice and conspiracy. The crime has caused racial tension in the small town. According to the Department of Justice, the two young men that committed the beating while shouting racial epithets at him, Derrick Donchak and Brandon Piekarsky, then seventeen and nineteen, are accused of hate crimes.

Donchak also faces three counts of conspiring to obstruct justice because he is accused of attempting to organize a cover-up with the Shenandoah Police Department. Three police officers were also indicted. Police Chief Matthew Nestor, Lieutenant William Moyer and Officer Jason Hayes are charged with conspiring to obstruct justice. Moyer faces additional charges of witness and evidence tampering and making false statements to the FBI. Officer Hayes was dating Piekarsky’s mother at the time.

 

Piekarsky had delivered a fatal kick to Ramirez’s head after Ramirez was knocked to the ground. The state medical examiner found that Ramirez died from blunt-force trauma to the head, according to the state prosecution.

Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell denounced the attack as racially motivated and asked the Justice Department to intervene. After the verdict, Rendell, in his letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder recommending the Justice Department pursue civil rights charges stated “the evidence suggests that Mr. Ramirez was targeted, beaten and killed because he was Mexican … Such lawlessness and violence hurts not only the victim of the attack, but also our towns and communities that are torn apart by such bigotry and intolerance.”

The indictment read that Nestor, Moyer and Hayes purposefully failed to “memorialize or record” statements made by Piekarsky and “wrote false and misleading official reports” to “intentionally omitted information about the true nature of the assault and the investigation.”

Crystal Dillman, Ramirez’s fiancée, welcomes the indictments, but is afraid for her safety and had to moved to an undisclosed location outside Shenandoah because her truck was vandalized and people have yelled racial epithets at her on the streets, according to her attorney.

The Department of Justice said “the FBI wants to hear from anyone who may have information regarding alleged civil rights violations or public corruption in Schuylkill County,” and those with information can contact the Allentown, Pennsylvania, FBI office.

For more information, please see:

CNN – 3 Police Officers Among 5 People Indicted in Race-Related Beating – 15 December 2009

NY Daily News – 4 Cops, 2 Teens Indicted in Hate Crime Probe of Fatal Attack on Latino Man – 15 December 2009

WNEP News Station – Death of Immigrant Leads to Federal Charges – 15 December 2009

By Stephen Kopko

Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

WASHINGTON D.C., United States – Washington, D.C. has become the latest city that will recognize same sex marriage. The Washington D.C. City Council passed a same sex marriage bill that would allow gay couples to marry within the city’s jurisdiction today. Before the passage of the legislation, the city recognized those same sex couples that were married in states or cities that allowed gay marriage.

The City Council passed the legislation by an eleven to two vote. The bill will now go to Mayor Adrian Fenty for approval. Mayor Fenty has promised to sign the same sex marriage legislation before Christmas. After the Mayor signs the legislation, it must survive a thirty day legislative review period before it becomes law.  The legislation also must be reviewed and passed by Congress, who controls the budget for Washington, D.C. 

Opponents of the bill are seeking two avenues in which the same sex legislation could be defeated. The first strategy that they are employing is lobbying Congress. Bishop Harry Jackson, pastor of Hope Christian Church said that he and his group, Stand4MarriageDC, will ask Congress not to approve the legislation.  Already, Republicans and conservative Democrats are trying to find ways for blocking the legislation. One of the ways is to attach a rider to future Washington, D.C. appropriations bills. However, many Congressional leaders are worried about usurping local autonomy. To defeat the legislation, both the House of Representatives and the Senate, as well as President Obama, would have to disapprove of the legislation.  The second strategy that opponents are going to use to try and prevent the same sex marriage bill from becoming law is through a referendum.

The Roman Catholic Church also opposing the passage of the bill. It stated that if the same sex marriage bill was passed, it might limit some of their social service programs. These programs help Washington, D.C. residents with adoption, homelessness, and health care. Also, the Church said that they would not extend spousal benefits in health care and retirement to same sex couples. 

Supporters of the bill as well as many of the City Council members were happy with the passage. They saw the approval of same sex marriage as a step in the right direction after New York did not approve of same marriage. One couple even became engaged shortly after the passage of the bill in the same meeting hall in which it passed.

For more information, please see:

MSNBC – D.C. City Council Votes to Legalize Gay Marriage – 15 December 2009

NY Times – D.C. Council Approves Gay Marriage – 15 December 2009

Washington Post – D.C. Council Approves Bill Legalizing Gay Marriage – 15

 

By Brenda Lopez Romero
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

MEXICO CITY, Mexico – The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) ruled today that the Mexican State is responsible for the triple femicides that occurred in 2001 in Juarez and Chihuahua. Mexico was legally sanctioned for damages and reparations in the amount of of $847,000 for the victims families. 

The Mexican government was accused of the murders of Esmeralda Herrera Monreal, fifteen years old; Laura Berenice Ramos Monárrez, seventeen years old, and Claudia Ivette González, twenty years old.

Additionally, the Court ruled that Mexico must remove the barriers to the suit for these three murders and was ordered to raise a monument within a year in memory of the victims and maintain a permanent website with information on all the women, teenagers, and girls that have disappeared since 1993.

IACHR also condemned Mexico for the killing and disappearance of women that have occurred since 1993.  The Court considered the homicides as “alarming” and ruled that Mexico violated anti-discrimination rights of women and children, the right to life, integrity, personal liberty, integrity of the victims families, and did not meet its duty and obligation to protect its citizens. 

The Court acknowledged that Mexico had “realized a recognition of partial responsibility … but had not adopted reasonable measures, in accordance to the circumstances of the case, to find the victims alive.”  Furthermore, the Court stated that there was a common denominator in all the cases, the fact that all the victims were females. Mexico attributed the homicides to various motives, but conceded that the overriding factor was the “influence of the culture of discrimination against women.”

The Secretary of State stated “that it was worth mentioning that most of the orders of the judgment refer to actions that the fed and state government have already implemented.” 

For more information, please see:

Los Angeles Times – Court Cites Rights Failure by Mexico in Juarez Killings of Women – 11 December 2009

The Associated Press – OAS Court Condemns Mexico Probes of Women Slayings – 11 December 2009

The New York Times – Mexico: Rebuke on Investigation of Murders – 11 December 2009

By Stephen Kopko   

Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

WASHINGTON, D.C. – United States President Barack Obama accepted the Nobel Prize for Peace in Norway today. Obama accepted the award after asking Congress for an additional thirty thousand troops to fight the war in Afghanistan. During his acceptance speech, Obama gave his reasons for increasing the number of troops to continue the war in Afghanistan. 

In October, the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the President the Nobel Prize for Peace. The award surprised many people around the world. Obama had only been in office less than a year before he was awarded the coveted prize. Obama was also surprised by the committee’s decision. After being notified of the recognition, Obama stated that he did not deserve to be in the company of past Peace Prize winners. He was humbled by the selection and would use it to promote important international objectives. These objectives include nuclear nonproliferation, settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict, and correcting the downturn in the global economy. 

Obama’s acceptance speech today focused on the current conflict in Afghanistan. Obama began his speech by saying that he was honored and humbled by being considered and recognized for the Peace Prize. He then stated that he admired past winners of the award that promoted nonviolent movements including Martin Luther King, Jr. and Gandhi. Obama then turned attention to the situation in Afghanistan. He stated that evil exists in the word and that he must defend the people of the United States against that evil, stating: “A nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitler’s armies. Negotiations cannot convince Al-Qaida’s leaders to lay down their arms.” 

Obama’s speech also outlined his definition of just war. He stated that the use of force is not cynical, but is a “recognition of history.” He then outlined three ways in which war is just. According to Obama, when a nation acts in self defense, in helping or aiding an invaded nation, and when acting in a humanitarian capacity after a nation murders its own citizens, force could be used. Obama also stressed how the United States should act when it is faced with using force. Wars should be fought according to the “rules of conduct.” He rejected the use of practices such as torture and the murder of innocent people. 

For more information, please see:

Christian Science Monitor – Left and Right, Pundits Applaud Obama Nobel Peace Prize Speech – 10 December 2009

MSNBC – Accepting Peace Prize, Obama Defends War – 10 December 2009

CNN – Nobel Peace Prize is “Call to Action” – 9 October 2009