Tunisia Seeks Custody of Tunisian Detainees

By Ann Flower Seyse
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TUNSI, Tunisia– Tunisia has requested that the United States send two Tunisian nationals being held on charges of Terrorism back to Tunisia. Both men have been convicted in absentia on terrorism-related charges. Earlier in May the United States requested that Italy take in the same two men, as Italy had been investigating their connection to an Islamist group. One of the men is currently being held in Guantanamo Bay prison, and the other is being held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.

Since President Barack Obama ordered the closure of U.S. run Guantanamo Bay Detention Center, the United States has been trying to persuade other countries to take in Guantanamo’s current detainees. Tunisia announced on May 26 that it would take all the Tunisian Nationals currently being detained in Guantanamo.

Bechir Tekkari, Tunisian Minister of Justice and Human Rights, says that Tunisia is happy to welcome ten Tunisians that are currently being detained at Guantanamo Bay. Tekkari vouched for Tunisia’s desire to try the detainees under the Tunisian legal system and under the ‘principle of the presumption of innocence’.

While Tekkari has not had any contact with the Obama administration Tunisia is ready to take the prisoners back. He also attempted to convince human rights activists that Tunisia would judge and punish the detainees appropriately under the existing Tunisian Laws. Tunisia has been scrutinized following a critical report from the human rights organization Human Rights Watch. The report alleges torture and “other ill-treatment in police stations and detention centers run by the state security department”, as well as a vivid description of one man’s ordeal in custody and the severe abuse that he endured.

Tekkari attempted to deal with the allegations of the Human Rights Watch report in his in his address on Tuesday. He also discussed a new bill that sought alternative sentencing, and would greatly reduce the number of detentions. Tekkari also welcomed inspectors from Human Rights Watch to come into Tunisian prisons and investigate first-hand.

The United States will be considering the sincerity of Tekkari’s remarks when they decide where to send the ten Tunisian Guantanamo detainees back to Tunisia. Given Tunisia’s specific request for two prisoners to be returned and the United States prior requests for other countries to take the Guantanamo prisoners, it will be a difficult decision for the US to make.

For more information, please see:

Legalbrief America- Government Prepared to Accept Guantanamo Detainees -1 June 2009

Reuters- Tunisia asks Washington to Hand Over Two Detainees– 31 May 2009

Tunisia Online News- Alternative Sentences Will Prevent the Detention of 10000 people Each Year – 27 May 2009

AFP- Tunisia Tells US it will Take in All its Guantanamo Nationals – 26 May 2009

AP- Tunisia Will Accept 10 Citizens Held in Guantanamo– 26 May 2009

Trial of Nobel Laureate Puts Burma Back in the International Spotlight

By Alishba I. Kassim
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

RANGOON, Burma-The trial of Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi has once again brought attention to the military junta controlling Burma. Human rights activists call the trial a sham and cite it as a chance to bring attention to the rights violations occurring under the current government.

Suu Kyi is facing an additional five years in detention for violating the terms of her house arrest. Suu Kyi was arrested for the violations when she allowed a trespasser to remain in her home overnight when he was too weak to leave. Many in the international community have called the trial a sham, including United States President Barack Obama who called the charges “spurious.”

International observers claim that the charges are meant to keep Suu Kyi out of the upcoming elections. Suu Kyi is the Secretary General of Burmas National League for Democracy and is one of the most vocal critics of Burmas ruling military junta. If Suu Kyi is in detention at the time of the elections she will not be allowed to play any role in process. Critics say this is the real reason behind the trial.

Many countries and human rights groups have asked the military junta to stop the trial and release Suu Kyi along with the estimated 2,000 other political prisoners being held by the Burmese government. Observers say that the military junta could gain political legitimacy if they allowed her to play a role in the upcoming elections. Human rights activist claim the trial and persecution of the Nobel Peace Prize winner is another example of the long line of human rights violations committed under the watch of the ruling military junta. The juntas spokesman Major-General Aye Myint stated that the trial “is not politicalit’s not a human rights issue, so we don’t accept pressure from abroad.”

For more information, please see:

Voice of America – Injustice In Burma – 29 May 2009

Washington Post – What the U.N. Can’t Ignore in Burma – 1 June 2009

Guardian – The EU must start squeezing Burma – 1 June 2009

Israel ‘Loyalty Oath’ Bill Voted Down in Committee

By Ann Flower Seyse
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

JERUSALEM, Israel – On May 31, the committee which advances bills to the Israeli parliament voted against proposing the ‘loyalty oath’ bill to the Knesset, the Israeli Parliament. The committee rejected the proposal eight votes to three.

The only votes in favor of this bill in committee were cast by members of the Yisrael Beitenu party, the same party that introduced the bill initially. The Yisrael Beitenu party has been described as “ultra right”, and is headed by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. This loyalty bill was one of Lieberman’s main campaign pledges.

Members of other parties thought that the bill’s intentions were discriminatory, and were glad to see that the majority of the people on the committee that concurred, and voted down the measure. Israeli Arab Lawmaker Jamal Zahalka called the vote “an achievement in the fight against fascism and racism.” 

The proposed legislation would have mandated that all Israeli citizens to swear allegiance to Israel as a “Jewish, Zionist, and democratic state before they could be issued national identification documents that are required for all citizens over age 16. The bill would have also forced all citizens to either work for a period of national service, or serve in the army. If a citizen did not comply with their service requirement their citizenship could be revoked. Many saw this bill as discriminatory, especially towards Arab citizens, and Orthodox Jews. Most Arab citizens do not serve in the Israeli military, though a few volunteer to serve.

The bill could still be “privately sponsored” by a member of the Yisrael Beitenu party, who introduced the bill initially. However, given the lack of support that this bill received in committee, it is unlikely to pass the legislature. It would be required to pass an extra, fourth vote on the Knesset floor.

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera- Israel ‘Loyalty Law’ Rejected – 31 May 2009

AP- Israel Throws Out Proposed ‘Loyalty Law’– 31 May 2009

Reuters- Israeli Cabinet Rejects Proposed Loyalty Oath – 31 May 2009

Examiner- Hardline Israeli Party to Introduce Loyalty Bill– 25 May 2009

EU Declares Elections in South Ossetia “Illegitimate”

By Meredith Lee-Clark
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TSKHINVALI, South Ossetia—The European Union has called the May 31 elections in South Ossetia “illegitimate,” and has stated that the EU will not recognize the results.  Eduard Kokoity, leader of the pro-Russian party, Yedinstvo (Unity), received nearly sixty percent of the vote, according to an early count.

South Ossetia was the site of intense fighting between Russian and Georgian forces during August 2008.  After the fighting ceased, South Ossetia declared independence from Georgia, and Russia recognized South Ossetia as an independent republic, as well as Abkhazia, another separatist region in the Georgian Republic.  The majority of nations consider South Ossetia a part of Georgia, while Russia and Nicaragua have recognized the region as an independent nation.

Prior to the election, critics called for an election boycott, stating that Kokoity sought a landslide victory in order to secure his hold on power, and ultimately unite the region with North Ossetia, which lies in the Russian Federation.  Critics also cited evidence that Kokoity, a former Russian wrestling champion, stifled dissent and intimidated political rivals.  Although four parties initially vied for the thirty-four parliamentary seats, the election commission barred participation by the two parties that did not support Kokoity.  Approximately 50,000 South Ossetians were eligible to vote, and Russian authorities set up voting stations inside Russia for expatriates and those who fled the August 2008 hostilities.

The Georgian minister of reintegration, Temuri Yakovashbili, echoed the EU’s sentiments, saying that few Georgians or ethnic Ossetians are left in the region after the August 2008 fighting.
One correspondent in South Ossetia said that the election results would increase the tension between Russia and Georgia.  “South Ossetia is basically propped up by Russia,” says Matthew Colin, a journalist for Al Jazeera, “It is a tiny area that could only ever survive with Russian military, economic, and political support… The question is…will the tensions around the border area erupt again into violence.”

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera – EU Condemns S Ossetia elections – 1 June 2009

Associated Press – EU calls South Ossetia elections “illegitimate” – 1 June 2009

TIME – South Ossetia’s No-Hope Elections – 1 June 2009

New York Times – South Ossetians Elect Parliament – 31 May 2009

Voice of America – Longtime Separatist Leader Ahead in South Ossetia Election – 31 May 2009

Sri Lanka Rejects Human Rights Probe

By Alishba I. Kassim
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka – The Sri Lankan government continues to reject calls to probe for human rights violations amidst allegations that an unprecedented number of civilians perished in the battle against Tamil separatists.

Media Minister Lakshman Yapa Abeywardena said “those who give various civilian casualty figures and call for these probes must have ulterior motives.” He further went onto say that the government was conducting its own analysis but declined to give any figures. “Our officials knew how many people were in the (war zone) area and we are taking a tally on the number of people now in the IDP (internally displaced persons) camps.”

Several groups such as Amnesty International have been calling for independent probes but are being met with resistance. Amnesty also urged the United Nations to reveal its own estimates of civilian casualties. Sam Zarifi, the group’s Asia Pacific director accused both sides of human rights violations and war crimes and repeated a request for an independent and international probe.

Last week Sri Lankan officials managed to garner enough South Asian support at the Geneva council session to pass a resolution describing the conflict as “a domestic matter that doesn’t warrant outside interference.” In a following controversial development, the council supported the Sri Lankan government’s decision to provide international NGOs and human rights agencies with limited access “as may be appropriate” to refugee camps.

Undoubtedly these developments have frustrated international organizations that are now unable to accurately assess the human rights violation in Sri Lanka and therefore are unable to respond appropriately.

It makes one wonder, when civilian victims are at issue, shouldn’t one accept all the aid and support available?

For more information, please see:

The Nation – Sri Lanka Rejects Probe after Crushing Tigers – June 01, 2009

Guardian – UN Rejects Call for Human Rights Inquiry – May 28, 2009

Straits Time – Sri Lanka Rejects Rights Probe – May 31, 2009

Press Trust of India – Sri Lanka Rejects Demands for Probe – May 31, 2009