IBA’s Human Rights Institute Criticizes Fiji Interim Regime’s Raid on Law Society
By Hayley J. Campbell
Impunity Watch Senior Desk Officer, Oceania
SUVA, Fiji – The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute has condemned the Fiji Military’s break-in of the Fiji Law Offices and removal of confidential files.
Fiji’s interim government issued a decree last week which stated that the Chief Registrar of the Court would take over the Law Society’s job of issuing practicing certificates to attorneys.
Following that decree, the interim regime ordered the military to raid the Law Society Offices, and take files relating to complaints about Law Society members.
Mark Ellis, IBA’s executive director, has called the interim government’s actions a “gross invasion of the rule of law,” and is concerned that such actions hurt the law profession’s independence in Fiji.
Mr. Ellis also says that the raid on the Law Society Offices is just one of many questionable actions the interim government has taken since the 2006 military coup of Fiji’s federal government. He called the latest break-in the “death knell” to the independence of Fiji’s legal profession.
Meanwhile, Fji’s interim attorney general, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, has called IBA’s concerns “misplaced,” arguing that they are only shared by a few lawyers in Fiji.
For more information, please see:
Radio New Zealand International – IBA criticises Fiji regime for raid on Law Society – 29 May 2009
The Australian – Fiji’s ‘junta judges’ – 29 May 2009
FijiVillage – BA concerns misplaced-AG – 29 May 2009
Internationally Recognized Advocate for Migrant Human Rights on the US-Mexico Border Dies at 72
Cook Islands Group Rejects Affirmative Action
By Angela Marie Watkins
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania
AVARUA, Cook Islands – A Cook Islands political group says using affirmative action to get more women into parliament is wrong.
The Group for Political Change was responding to a two-day conference held this week in the Cook Islands aimed at developing a temporary measure, such as reserving seats for women, to increase women’s parliamentary representation to 30 percent. At the moment, women hold three out of the 24 seats.
The two-day conference was a joint initiative between the International Development Law Organization, the United Nations Development Fund for Women, the Gender and Development Division of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat.
Participants in the conference claim that increasing the number of women in the Cook Islands Parliament is an important first step toward gender balance in government.
A founding member of the Group for Political Change, Elizabeth Ponga, says the Cook Islands society would definitely benefit from having more women MPs but that using affirmative action and bypassing the democratic process to vault women into parliament are wrong.
Ponga speculated that with a democratic political system it will only be a matter of time before there are more women in Cook Islands politics.
For more information, please see:
Radio New Zealand International – Cook Islands take first official step towards more women MPs – 30 May 2009
Radio New Zealand International – Cook Islands activists say affirmative parliamentary action for women wrong – 30 May 2009
Global Recession Hinders Human Rights in Central Asia
By Hyo-Jin Paik
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia
TASHKENT, Uzbekistan – When Central Asian countries did not answer questions from Amnesty International over the past year, experts concluded that governments in those countries have set aside human rights over economic issues.
However, Amnesty’s Europe and Central Asia Director Nicola Duckworth said, “You cannot separate human rights out from other…problems that exist, because human rights…rests at the base of the solution for problems, whether it is political, or whether it is economic.”
Consequently, in its annual report, Amnesty International found that the largest number of human rights issues are unresolved in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. All dissent is suppressed in both countries, and while human rights activists are able to work in other Central Asian countries like Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan, such is impossible in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.
Further, although death penalty was abolished in Uzbekistan in January 2009, no one knows how many people were actually executed or are serving life imprisonment, leaving surviving family members wondering whether or not their loved ones are alive. Moreover, Uzbek refugees are often forced to return to their homeland where they risk human rights violations, and human rights activists working in Uzbekistan are harassed and persecuted.
Protesters in Uzbekistan (Source: Front Line)
Impunity by the Turkmenistani government is prevalent as well. In both countries, justice fails because there is no system to ensure rule of law in that there are obstacles, such as difficulty in obtaining a lawyer, failure of prosecutors to pursue investigations, low penalty for convicted officials, and fear of reprisals by the victims.
Some attribute the reason for repression to the fact that countries like Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are still strongly depended on Russia, and Central Asian countries have adopted the worst from its neighbors.
Ann Bayevsky of Hudson Institute has criticized the United Nations for its failure to address the problem saying, “They [UN Human Rights Council] just eradicated human rights investigations in [Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan] because human rights abusers hold the balance of power.”
For more information, please see:
ABC News – Amnesty: Recession Leading to Repression – 28 May 2009
Amnesty International – Amnesty International Report 2009 Europe and Central Asia – 28 May 2009
Human Rights Watch – Uzbekistan: Stop Detention, Harassment of Activists – 29 May 2009
Trend News – Amnesty International: Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan leading black list of Central Asia countries – 29 May 2009
Voice of America – Amnesty International Scores Russian Human Rights Record – 28 May 2009
Voice of America – UN Body Criticized for Not Fighting for Human Rights – 22 May 2009