Syrian Revolution Digest: Wednesday, 6 March 2013

The Real Spillover Effect!

What’s the point of the international order that the United States in particular has played a crucial role in establishing, as flawed as it is, if conflicts like the one raging in Syria are neglected? What’s the point of working hard to come up with the legal notion of “Responsibility to Protect” if it is to be ignored when the challenge ahead is actually serious? Even if the dissolution of Syria followed by a regional meltdown had little impact on U.S. strategic interests, and that’s a rather big IF, the real spillover effect that we all should fear is the breakdown of the existing international order with no alternative in sight but chaos. It might take the world years before we get to this point, but we will get there eventually and the starting point will be the way the conflict in Syria was ignored and mismanaged. Why Syria and not Congo? The ongoing real time documentation of major developments over the last two years, the inherent racism in the current order which still ascribes more psychological and political relevance to developments closer to the West, and the timing of this development in Syria which coincides with a series of economic, social and political upheavals in different parts of the world, will combined in due course of time to give developments in Syria that weight. This has the potential of becoming the hair that broke the camel’s back.

Today’s Death Toll: 141 martyrs, including 12 children, 11 women and 2 martyrs under torture. 34 martyrs reported in Damascus and Suburbs, 27 in Homs, 30 in Idlib, 18 in Raqqa, 16 in Aleppo, 6 in Deir Ezzor, 4 in Lattakia, 3 in Hama and 3 in Daraa (LCCs).

Points of Random Shelling: 440 points: Shelling with Warplanes was reported in 33 points, with the fiercest shelling taking place in Raqqa, shelling with SCUD missiles was documented in 3 points; cluster bombs in 5 points; where vacuum bombs in 1 point in Maaret Noaman, and another point in Dar Abeera in Homs; whereas, shelling with Mortars was reported in 130 points, with artillery in 155 and with rocket launchers in 113 points (LCCs).

Clashes: 142. Successful operations include “liberating” both the political and the military security headquarters in Raqqa City, shooting downa MiG in the town of Heesh, Idlib, and shelling the military airports of Minnigh and Nairab in Aleppo with local made rockets. In Homs, FSA rebels managed to destroy a loyalist checkpoint in Zablatanim, and in Damascus City, they repelled an attack on Jobar Neighborhood (LCCs).

 

News

Syria’s refugee tide passes one-million mark Around half the refugees are children, most of them aged under 11, and the numbers leaving are mounting every week, the United Nations refugee agency said in statement. “With a million people in flight, millions more displaced internally, and thousands of people continuing to cross the border every day, Syria is spiraling towards full-scale disaster,” U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres said in a statement.

Syria crisis: Teenage mother ‘becomes millionth refugee’ (Video) A teenager has become the one millionth refugee of the crisis in Syria, according to the UN. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees has warned the country is “spiralling towards full-scale disaster”. Half of the refugees so far are children, the UN said, most of them under 11 and often traumatised by their experiences. Bushra, 19, registered as a refugee in Lebanon, along with her young children, as the BBC’s Nik Gowing reports.

U.N.: 20 peacekeepers detained in Syria The U.N. Security Council demanded their immediate and unconditional release. The capture of the peacekeepers marked a new escalation in the spillover of Syria’s civil war, now entering its third year. It followed the Feb. 25 announcement that a member of the peacekeeping force, known as UNDOF, was unaccounted for. The U.N. said the peacekeeping member, who has not been identified, is still missing. Russia’s U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, the current Security Council president, said talks are under way between U.N. officials from the peacekeeping force, known as UNDOF, and the captors.

Arab League discusses giving Syria’s seat to opposition
… ministers meeting in Cairo were divided on whether to let the opponents of President Bashar al-Assad take over Syria’s seat, previously held by the Damascus government. “The discussions on giving the Syrian seat to the opposition are taking place now and there are countries for it and others against it,” one diplomat said on the condition of anonymity.

Syria world’s top destination for jihadists, says William Hague, as aid promised Syria has become the “top destination for jihadists” across the world, William Hague said on Wednesday, announcing that Britain will give the opposition “non-lethal” military equipment for the first time.

Syria War: Rebels Joined By Chechnya Islamic Militants In ‘Jihad’ Against Assad (VIDEO) “This is the first time that a mass number of Chechens have taken part in military actions abroad,” said analyst Mairbek Vatchagayev, based in Paris, adding that claims were made that Chechens had fought with the Taliban in Afghanistan or in Iraq, but no definitive proof had been given.

Syria’s Assad says Chavez death is “personal loss” Chavez, an ally and regular guest of Assad’s, shipped diesel fuel to Syria last year to help it overcome shortages caused by Western sanctions, and described the Syrian conflict as an international plot backed by Western powers. Assad described Chavez’s death as “a great loss to me personally and to the people of Syria”.

Syria Civil War Threatens Cradle of World Cultures Tanks, looters prey on treasures of past civilizations of Macedonia, Rome and the Byzantine Empire and roots of Islam, Christianity and Judaism

 

Special Reports

Aleppo at War: Everyday Life in the Death Zone
In Aleppo, every footstep is a crunch. The streets are strewn with rubble and broken glass from destroyed buildings and shattered windows. It’s a sound that distinguishes a walk around this war-torn Syrian town from any other city in the world.

Syria’s House of Cards
After two years, 1 million refugees, and more than 70,000 dead, some Syrians — and one American president — are still looking to protect their own interests rather than save a country.

Syria’s war: Keeping up appearances
The regime continues to pay salaries to Syria’s civil servants, wherever they may be, even though government offices in swathes of the country are empty. Earlier this month the north-eastern provincial city of Raqqa fell to Mr Assad’s enemies—the first city to do so. Yet the show must go on. In Damascus the electricity board still issues citizens with bills. The postal service still delivers mail no more erratically than before. Even the Meteorological Office is on hand to publish forecasts of rain. For Syrians who enjoy star-gazing, the Astronomical Society has notified them to look out for a comet between March 12th and 14th.

Change the Focus of the Syria Debate
One approach would be for western governments to initiate assistance programs through the multilateral agencies (such as the UN, Islamic Development Bank and World Bank Group) which were designed for this purpose, but equally importantly, have the resources to put personnel on the ground and devote the funds necessary to have a meaningful impact. Call it ‘pre-emptive development’. Another idea is to create lending and guarantee schemes specifically earmarked for high risk post-conflict reconstruction. This has of course been done in the past, but usually too long after a conflict has ended, and often implemented too late to be maximally effective to those most in need. If we want post-conflict Syria to end up better prepared to survive the chaos and despair engulfing Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and elsewhere in the region, we must do a much better job of marshalling and deploying the civilian, political and economic resources essential to the establishment of political stability. If this were to occur, perhaps Syria could serve as a turning point in ‘pre-emptive’ post-conflict reconstruction and development, rather than a continuation of the flawed approach that has been replicated numerous times over past decades, with predictable results.

My new paper, prepared for a briefing in Washington, D.C. that took place on January 15, 2013, is now out and is titled “Syria 2013: Rise of the Warlords.” It should be read in conjunction with my previous briefing “The Shredded Tapestry,” and my recent essay “The Creation of an Unbridgeable Divide.

Quickly Noted
* “Pre-emptive development” is an interesting concept indeed, and one that the United States and European Union seems to be dabbling with at this stage in connection to developments in Syria, but the problem here is that the impact of such preemption will remain negligible so long as scuds and bombs keep raining down on people in liberated areas. Bear in mind what’s happening to Raqqah City at this stage: over 30 aerial raids have been undertaken and two scuds hit neighboring communities in the 24 hours following its liberation. What possible developmental activity can take place in these conditions? We don’t just anything to be done, we need the right thing to be done. If there no will to do that, than doing nothing might be preferable.

 

Video Highlights

A missile attack on Jobar Neighborhood, Damascus City http://youtu.be/XcjVJ-U_E7k The neighborhood of Tadamon was also pounded http://youtu.be/uujd1cr-UgY

In the town of Daraya, Damascus Suburbs, a local factory burns to the ground on account of the constant shelling by pro-regime militias http://youtu.be/Os0eH0r6sVQ

A Scud launched from the Qalamoun region in Damascus Suburbs takes course towards Raqqa Province passing over the town of Yabroud http://youtu.be/nigMFRm6OZI

The pounding of the town of Rabeeah in North Latakia by pro-regime militias http://youtu.be/ApWf7cs8P30

Rebels in Aleppo keep up their pounding of the Kuweiris Military Airport using home-made rockets http://youtu.be/oCznimD_ReA , http://youtu.be/QCTHLx0zneg , http://youtu.be/fowb2w6V0mQ , http://youtu.be/WqXti-T4Qdc

Clashes in Daraa continue http://youtu.be/4sFkjg48hCg , http://youtu.be/YMJP-fTyErA , http://youtu.be/Mfn3SK2EFhQ

Raqqa City: Over 30 air raids in less than 24 hours following the city’s liberation took their toll http://youtu.be/iCNT4SF4e3c , http://youtu.be/xvg8S8SPyw0 , http://youtu.be/oIuoCjqxtXk , http://youtu.be/raXjbd8a0M

Turkmen protest the elections in Gaziantep for a council in Aleppo Province, claiming they are being marginalized http://youtu.be/j26Ow23GcrU

The town of Jamla near the border with Israel continues to witness heavy clashes between rebels and loyalist militias http://youtu.be/bgvlHSGUL9s It’s a group affiliated with the rebels in Jamla that is currently holding the UN observer.

The battle for control of rebel strongholds in Homs city continues http://youtu.be/9Jkyc8E3vvY , http://youtu.be/EaVyZ0KHGNQ , http://youtu.be/uKLGQJm4lwM , http://youtu.be/DrfCv8966u4 , http://youtu.be/yrEkU2pbziM

Chris Smith, Chairman of House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Human Rights, Denied Russian Visa

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MOSCOW, Russia – U.S. Representative Chris Smith, a leading congressional human-rights advocate, was denied a visa to travel to Russia last week by authorities in Moscow.  Smith believes the denial is in retaliation for the recently passed U.S. Magnitsky Act, which imposes sanctions and visa bans on Russian officials believed involved in human rights violations.

Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ). (Photo Courtesy of the Moscow Times)

Russia has never before denied Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on human rights, a visa.  Smith says “The Magnitsky bill is the reason I didn’t get the visa.  This is the first time.  I was shocked.  During the worst days of the Soviet Union I went there repeatedly.”  Smith vocally backed and voted in favor of the bill, as did 364 other members of the House.  Russia is now among a short list of countries, including China, Cuba, and Belarus, to deny Smith, a veteran of the House since 1981, a visa.

No official reason has been given for refusing the visa and the Russian Embassy in Washington has refused to comment on visa issues.  However, Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak told Smith that the decision was made in Moscow, not Washington.

Although the State Department, including U.S. Ambassador to Russia Mike McFaul, attempted to intercede on Smith’s behalf, Moscow was not swayed.

The purpose of Smith’s visit was to discuss the frosty relations between Russia and the United States since the passage of the Magnitsky Act, particularly Russia’s reply, the Dima Yakovlev Law.  This law, passed shortly before the end of last year, ended U.S. adoption of Russian orphans (citing concerns American parents abuse Russian children) and reciprocal sanctions including visa bans and asset freezes for alleged U.S. human rights violators.

“I even have a resolution that highlights the fact that those 19 kids died.  If somebody is responsible for this, they ought to pay a price,” Smith lamented.  “I was going over to talk about adoption and human trafficking.  They have legitimate concerns that we have to meet.”

Russian authorities were incensed when U.S. President Barack Obama signed the Magnitsky Act into law in December, and considered the Act, labeling certain Russian officials as connected to human rights abuses, as meddling in Russian domestic affairs.  By mid-April, the Obama administration is required to submit a list of Russian officials to be blacklisted, which could further heighten tensions between the countries.

Valery Garbuzov, the deputy director of the Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies in Moscow, has warned that Smith’s visa denial may be the first volley in an extended visa war.  He further cautioned that the nations’ top leaders need to take actions to halt such a visa war.  “President Obama cannot cancel the Magnitsky Act, so relations will have to be built on these premises,” he said. “At the same time, the Russian response was excessive, which made the situation snowball.”

MP Alexei Pushkov, head of the State Duma’s International Affairs Committee, said whether U.S. officials receive visas is dependent upon the United States, and noted that the sponsors of the Magnitsky Act will not be allowed to travel to Russia, in the “spirit” of the Dima Yakovlv law.  “We were not the initiators of this process,” he said.  “In every country, restrictions can be put in place for certain categories of people based on the spirit of existing legislation.”

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov declared in January that Russia has a “Guantanamo list” of 71 U.S. nationals who are barred from entering Russia due to human rights violations.

Smith, however, is determined to keep a dialogue open with Russia, and plans to continue to push for the visa. “I was going over to talk about adoption and human trafficking,” Smith said. “They have legitimate concerns that we have to meet. I’m disappointed but I am determined to have it reversed. So I’m going to reapply.”

For further information, please see:

Moscow Times – U.S. Lawmaker Says Russia Denied Him Visa – 28 March 2013

RIA Novosti – US Official Denied Russian Visa, Cites Magnitsky Row: Report – 28 February 2013

RT – We Did Not Initiate the Visa Row With US – Russian Lawmaker – 28 February 2013

The Cable – Russia Denies Visa for Leading Congressional Human-Rights Advocate – 27 February 2013

Syrian Revolution Digest: 5 March 2013

The Frog!

Syrian Revolution Digest – March 5, 2013 

By trying to fill his father’s shoes, Bashar Al-Assad ended up magnifying his father’s sociopathy. One destroyed a city in order to concentrate his power, the other destroyed a country, and has little power left. The frog can never become a bull. Bashar can never become his father. And Syria will never be the same.

 

Tuesday March 5, 2013

 

Today’s Death Toll: 134 martyrs, including 9 children,7 women and 2 martyrs under torture. 34 martyrs reported in Damascus and Suburbs, 27 in Daraa, 23 in Raqqa, 18 in Aleppo, 12 in Homs, 11 in Idlib, 5 in Deir Ezzor, 3 in Hama and 1 martyr in Lattakia (LCCs).

 

Points of Random Shelling: 406 points: warplanes shelling was recorded in 12 points, and shelling with Scud missiles was reported in 4 points, while the shelling with mortar shells was reported in 122 points and artillery shelling was recorded in 160 points, the shelling with rocket launchers was recorded in108 points (LCCs).

 

Clashes: 138. Successful operations include the liberation of the village of Sfeira in Aleppo. In Damascus and Sububs, FSA rebels targeted a checkpoint in Ein Tarma and destroyed 2 tanks and inflicting heavy casualties on regime soldiers. FSA rebels carried out a successful raid on a loyalist convoy traveling on the Damascus International Airport Highway destroying tanks and inflicting heavy casualties near the checkpoint of Ghassouleh. In Hama, rebels destroyed a convoy east of the town of Khan Arnabeh (LCCs).

 

News

Kerry: U.S. more confident arms flow to Syria moderates Kerry, on his first overseas tour since taking office, told a news conference in Doha he had held talks with nations in the region about the kinds of arms being sent to the different Syrian opposition forces. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are widely believed to be providing weapons to the rebels, but the United States says it does not wish to send arms for fear they may find their way to Islamist hardliners who might then use them against Western targets.

Low on Ammo, Rebels Drive in Northern Syria Slows The rebels’ capture of this strategic city was a key success in their advances in northern Syria against regime forces. But it’s so far proven an incomplete victory. Maaret al-Numan remains a shell of a city. One major reason: Rebels have been unable to take a large regime military base on the edge of the city. Artillery fire from Wadi Deif and other nearby government strongholds regularly thuds into its largely empty residential buildings, while warplanes pound surrounding villages. The vast majority of the population has fled and it’s too unsafe for them to return.

Syria spillover, al Qaeda strain Iraq security Invigorated by the conflict in neighboring Syria, insurgents are gaining ground and recruits in Iraq’s Sunni heartland, regrouping in the vast desert where the Euphrates river winds through both countries, security officials say.

Free Syrian Army secret bakery helps quell food shortage in Aleppo – video A secret bakery, run by the Free Syrian Army, is helping to feed people in the Syrian city of Aleppo. With scarce fuel supplies, much of the industry in Syria’s largest city has shut down. However one bakery, which has resorted to operating in secret, is continuing to supply residents with fresh bread and is helping to quell the growing food shortage in the city.

Children lack schooling in Syria crisis, UNICEF says One in 5 Syrian schools have suffered damage or have been converted into shelters, UNICEF said in a new overview of the parlous state of education in Syria, where an armed rebellion has been raging for almost two years. In some cases, UNICEF said, armed groups have commandeered schools. At least 2,400 schools have been damaged or destroyed, the U.N. children’s agency said.

Syrian jets bomb northern city overrun by rebels The rebels continued to battle pockets of government troops in Raqqa, struggling to crush the remaining resistance in the city of 500,000 people on the Euphrates river. If successful, it would be the first major city they would completely control in the civil war, and would consolidate their recent gains in the northern Syrian towns along the river.

Syrian Forces Hit Two Cities as Rebels Claim Advances Highways through Homs and Hama connect the western coast, a stronghold for the ruling regime’s Alawite minority, to Damascus. The roads are vital supply routes for the military and possible exit routes for Alawites seeking to flee other parts of Syria and head back to the coast. While diplomats said Alawite officials have started to send some of their families to coastal villages and hometowns from Damascus, President Assad and the Alawite core that make up the security and military apparatus appear to be focused on controlling Damascus, Homs and Hama. “The Plan B for the regime seems to be consolidation in Damascus, not contraction to the coast,” a Western diplomat working on Syria said.

 

Special Reports

No point in raising false hopes in Syria

Obsessing over whether the ‘right’ people get whatever aid is sent to the Syrian rebels, however, misses the point. The real argument for keeping clear of the Syrian conflict, at least in a military sense, is this: neither America nor any other western nation is prepared to commit to the struggle against Al Assad in any substantive way. There will be no ground troops. There will not even be a no-fly zone. The political will to sustain an intervention in Syria simply does not exist. Lacking that will, it is better to keep clear of the conflict in any military sense.

Syria’s Many Militias: Inside the Chaos of the Anti-Assad Rebellion

…if the Military Command is to successfully stitch together the patchwork of factions and militias that make up the rebellion, it needs some form of leverage — and the funneling of weapons and ammunition into Syria is supposed to be its modus operandi. Although there are reports of new batches of armaments being shuttled mainly via Syria’s southern border with Jordan, as well as its northern one with Turkey, Idris says it’s all not enough: “We need between 500-600 tons of ammunition a week. We get between 30-40 tons. So you do the calculations.”

In Lebanon, a proxy battle for Syria

Sectarian violence in Lebanon may resemble Syria’s conflict, but residents say the real problems are poverty and neglect.

Two Years of Civil War in Syria, and What About the Future?

Syria as we know it in current maps, is for all intents and purposes a political fiction. There is no more one Syria, there are quite a few Syrias. In that regard, Bashar Assad may have a point. He keeps saying, that the “great game” of Turkey, the U.S., Saudi-Arabia and others is to divide Syria. Well, Syria is indeed divided, but the dictator should blame himself in the first place, as his policies made it impossible for any meaningful reform to take place in Syria, one that could have prevented the current calamity. But then, exactly because the regime has always been based on the Alawites and other minorities, it lacked any real desire for reforms which would have brought it down, if leading to a truly representative democratic regime.

Nihad Sirees: Daddy Dearest – Inside the mind of Bashar al-Assad

Why does war still savage Syria? When will it stop? Is President Bashar al-Assad a man trapped in his dead father’s web? Has his cruelty been thrust upon him by family and fate, or is it entirely of his own making? Does he want to flee in defeat? To admit he has been ruinously wrong?… The young president was completely immersed in his father’s experience. His father’s legacy dominated the mentality of the son, and he could not escape from it, or think outside it. Every time Bashar the president confronted a new development in the current crisis, he resorted not to his own common sense but looked back for similarities to what his father had experienced in the past and how he had reacted. He became a brutal mimic man.

Chester Crocker: Syria’s Crisis of Transition

First, successful repression by the Assad regime appears to have failed. Second, a scenario of de facto—let alone de jure—partition of the country would compound the turmoil already facing the region and thus would find little favor in Turkey, Iran or Iraq. Third, an outright victory by opposition forces that effectively blows away the regime is highly unlikely. Fourth, there is little chance of decisive external combat intervention on behalf of the opposition. Syrian mayhem appears unlikely to prompt a repetition of the kind of NATO/UN military action seen in the Balkans, and Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad knows it. One implication of these observations is that Syria’s best chance lies in the possibility of an internationally led, negotiated transition that is subject to some measure of external monitoring or peacekeeping (UN/Arab League). The key to such an outcome would hinge on American and Russian negotiators with the assistance of UN–Arab League special envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, the veteran Algerian mediator.

 

My new paper, prepared for a briefing in Washington, D.C. that took place on January 15, 2013, is now out and is titled “Syria 2013: Rise of the Warlords.” It should be read in conjunction with my previous briefing “The Shredded Tapestry,” and my recent essay “The Creation of an Unbridgeable Divide.

 

Quickly Noted

 

* “Chavez is with Hafiz now!” (Comment by a Syrian activist on Facebook)

 

* We want real policy for managing the Syria situation into a fair resolution, not a smoke screen meant to alleviate political pressure or some feeling of guilt.

 

* If people want to blame basketball player Dennis Rodman for saying that North Korea’s dictator is a “great” and “humble” man, what should we do, I wonder, with all those Syria experts who for years kept contending that Assad is a reformer? Especially when so many of them are still getting consulted on all things Syrian and are still providing advice to U.S. and western leaders?

 

* In his recent interview, Assad mockingly asked for the names of the martyrs his troops and militias had killed. Well, we actually have them. Even the U.N. acknowledges that the actual death toll is far in excess of the oft-quoted 70,000, but these are the documented cases.

 

U.S. efforts on Iran not working, Syria planning underway: Mattis

 

Mattis also painted a daunting portrayal of events on the ground in Syria, where he said the situation was too complex at this point for him to support arming rebels battling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

 

“We don’t want to inadvertently, with the best of intentions, arm people who are basically sworn enemies,” he said before the Senate Armed Services Committee… “The collapse of the Assad regime, sir, would be biggest strategic setback for Iran in 25 years,” Mattis said in response to a question from Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island…

 

Mattis said “quiet planning” was also underway with regional allies for potential stability operations if needed after the Syrian regime’s collapse, and pointed to regional organizations like the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) as groups “that may be able to take this on.”

 

“We are doing some planning with the regional militaries and getting basically a framework for what this would look like,” he said.

 

Still, Mattis said the situation in Syria remained “fundamentally unpredictable,” even though Assad’s power base and geographic area of control were eroding.

 

Asked how long he believed Assad could hold onto power, at least in a sub-region of Syria, Mattis said: “I really don’t have the ability to forecast this well, Senator.”

 

“I’d hate to give you some kind of certainty that I don’t sense right now,” he said.

 

Video Highlights

 

Thanks to this straightforward report by the Abkhazian News Network, a creation of Russian intelligence covering developments in Syria and of course wholeheartedly buying the regime line on its fight against terrorist, we are taken on a tour of the battlefield in the town of Daraya, Damascus Suburbs, to see exactly how the regime combats “terrorism. The report is succinctly tiled “A Tank Assault,” and is nothing more than a camera put on the top of an attack tank, with occasional commentary in Russian. The commentary is not as important as the visuals. The fact that ANN and its correspondents don’t realize that they are in effect documenting a war crime in action is… as surreal as the unfolding scene http://youtu.be/Vn_ABGjWAH8

 

Daraa: After liberating a loyalist checkpoint in the village of Jamlah, rebels executed their prisoners despite heated protestations from some in their ranks http://youtu.be/T5Z0E1EIBbc The fighters, however, are not affiliated with Jabhat Al-Nusra or any other Jihadi groups, their rhetoric and their adherence to the independence flag indicate that they are the “moderate” Islamists we hear so much about. There are no more moderates in this fight. We have waited too long. http://youtu.be/Mly9pm9FeDA “Those who don’t defect, will be killed” http://youtu.be/W7_qUMqtjcg The incident took place on March 4. In many ways, the options ahead for international intervention have become increasingly limited and perhaps the scenario described by Chester Crocker is the most realistic one at this stage.

 

In nearby Khirbet Ghazaleh, rebels destroy a tank http://youtu.be/u_mg7kCuenw

 

Meanwhile members of Jabhat Al-Nusra were busy destroying a shipment of alcoholic beverages http://youtu.be/_MY0bY5m9Qk Elsewhere, in Minnigh, rebels from JAN taking part in laying siege tot eh airport turn down a request from an old man to join them http://youtu.be/CykhsJ8MKYM

 

In Deir Ezzor, shelling by pro-regime troops besieging the provincial capital damages its famous suspended bridge. Locals believes it could soon collapse http://youtu.be/ISbTP-eSTUk Elsewhere in the City, clashes continue http://youtu.be/zdEtslCyhQ8

 

More and more villages come under shelling by regime forces as they intensify their assault on the provinces of Homs and Hama: Deir Fool, Homs local rush to save the wounded http://youtu.be/IKcKrLdshdo , http://youtu.be/paYYsUIfwPY

 

People stream out of the recently liberated Raqqah City to evade bombing b y MiGs http://youtu.be/1OLmxwfb8P4

 

IHRDC: Witness Statement of Saeed Pourheydar

c.gif

March 5, 2013 — In this witness statement and short video testimony, Saeed Pourheydar—an Iranian journalist now living in exile—discusses his arrest following the disputed June 2009 presidential elections in Iran and his subsequent detention at Evin prison.

In recent weeks, journalists affiliated with reformist news outlets have been arrested by Iranian authorities in what appears to be a broad crackdown aimed at targeting and intimidating the press in advance of Iran’s presidential elections this June.  Following the disputed June 2009 presidential elections in Iran, scores of journalists were arrested on allegations of “endangering national security” and “giving interviews to foreign media”.  Iran currently ranks as one of the top jailers of journalists in the world.

In his statement, Pourheydar notes the pressures on himself and other Iranian journalists to not send news to the outside world and describes how his cell phone communications were monitored and under surveillance by Iranian authorities. Pourheydar also describes his trial before Judge Pirabbasi of Branch 26 of the Revolutionary Court in Tehran and how he received news of the death sentences of Gholamreza Khosravi and Saeed Malekpour.

INTERVIEW
Name: Saeed Pourheydar
Place of Birth:  Orumiyeh, Iran  
Date of Birth:  1981 
Occupation:  Journalist      
Interviewing Organization: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center (IHRDC)
Date of Interview:  14 October 2012
Interviewer: IHRDC Staff

This statement was prepared pursuant to an interview with Saeed Pourheydar. It was approved by Saeed Pourheydar on March 3, 2013. There are 60 paragraphs in the statement.

The views and opinions of the witness expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center.

Background

1.  I am Saeed Pourheydar, I was born in Orumiyeh in 1981 and I was a resident of Tehran. I was a journalist in Iran for about 12 years. I was first arrested in 2000 when I was 19. Since [that first arrest] and up until the present day I have been detained five times. I worked at a couple of publications in West Azerbaijan Province from 1999-2000, when I became more active in political and social fields, up until I left Orumiyeh in 2006.

2.  After the elections in Iran, I was arrested twice. [In the first of the incidents] I was arrested on February 5, 2010, and held in solitary confinement for a month in Section 240. When interrogations ended I was temporarily released. I was arrested again about seven or eight months later, in October 2010 and held in Section 350 of Evin prison for precisely 52 days.

3.  I began working as a journalist in 2000. At the time I lived in Orumiyeh and worked for a number of weekly publications in West Azerbaijan, such as Farday-e Ma, Navid-e Azerbaijan, and others. I also worked as a journalist at the provincial branches of some national newspapers such as Hambastegi, Mardomsalari, Sobh-e Emrooz and others. Meanwhile I was also involved in journalism, politics and active with different organizations.  For instance I cooperated with parties which had representative offices in the province such as the Mosharekat Party [The Islamic Iran Participation Front] and the Hambastegi Party [Islamic Iran Solidarity Party].[1] I was also active in social causes as a secretary and/or member of the board of directors of certain NGOs.

4.  I came to Tehran in 2006 and I started working at newspapers. And I continued my cooperation with the political parties that I was connected with in Orumiyeh.

5.  After the 2009 election, I, like many other people, participated in all the street protests. At the same time, I was also blogging and published all the news about the demonstrations. This had a good impact and media outside Iran welcomed my blog as a news source inside Iran. I also gave interviews with Voice of America television, BBC Persian Service, Radio Farda and a number of other media outlets to provide information about what was happening in the streets.

First detention after the presidential election in 2009

6.  On February 5, 2010, there was a gathering in Behest-e Zahra cemetery to mark the 40th day since the killings after the election. It was a Friday and I was supposed to meet a friend to go there together. I used to go to all the events with this friend. I made an appointment to pick my friend up in my car at 8 a.m. in the morning to go to Behesht-e Zahra.

7.  Agents followed me from my house with the intention to arrest both of us. I arrived at my friend’s home and when we drove to the next street, a car stopped in front of and another behind my car. It was as if they wanted to catch a fugitive killer. Eight armed plain-clothed agents of the Intelligence Ministry detained us with utmost violence. I was handcuffed immediately. My foot was injured as I was dragged on the ground.

8.  My friend was put in one car and I was put in another.  My car was left in the middle of the street. They took us to a parking lot at the Argentina Terminal before taking me to my house and conducting a search. Usually a couple of hundred cars are parked at the terminal but it was a Friday and not very busy. They parked in between the cars. I could see my friend in the other car from a distance. Right there in the Argentina parking lot, they started to beat us and curse at us.

9.  One of the agents held a camera and they demanded a confession. They said I had to make a choice: admit I am working for the Mojahedin-e Khalgh [MEK] or the Monarchist Society. They said I must claim responsibility on behalf of one of these two groups and confess. I refused and I was severely beaten in the car and pistol-whipped. The beatings went on for ten minutes. I could see my friend was being treated the same way. Later on when we were released my friend told me the same things happened to them as well. Then someone got out of the other car and whispered something in the ear of the driver of the car I was in. I don’t know what was said but they stopped filming and drove toward my house.

10. It was 8:30 or 9 a.m. in the morning when I was arrested. All of this took place within an hour or hour and a half. When we got out of the Argentina Terminal parking lot they took me to my house. Four armed agents searched my house for about an hour. They collected and took inventory of a lot of my books, writings, CDs and tapes, even my fax machine and everything else they could get their hands on—and took them away. They filmed all this. Then they put me inside the car again. They told my family not to tell anyone about my arrest. They said if I cooperate, and my family does not speak a word, I could go free sooner.

11. One of the four agents who arrested me was a young boy who wore glasses. He was tall and had a beard. He played the role of the “good guy” in this story.[2] He was also the first person to interrogate me. But after the interrogation I did not see him again. Another younger agent, who was well-built, made a lot of threats. He kept waving his gun. He made more threats when we were inside my house. He stood a certain way to make sure I could see his gun, so as to scare me. There were two other agents who seemed very experienced. They looked like they were 40-45 years old.  One of them had lost most of his hair and had a round face. These two older agents looked very much alike.

12. They were so violent that it was impossible to speak to them before we reached my house. Inside the house they were a bit calmer. I asked if they had a warrant? They showed me a general order from the prosecutor’s office to the Intelligence Ministry giving them permission to detain anyone taking part in protests. There was no name on it and they did not allow me to see the date. He held up the order in his hand.  They had introduced themselves as agents of the Intelligence Ministry. Then they took me from the house to Evin prison.

Evin Prison, Section 240

13. During the entire time [of transfer from my house to Evin] my eyes were open until we reached the Evin prison gate. As soon as we reached Evin two agents blindfolded me and told me to keep my head down. An iron gate opened and we entered the prison. They took me inside a building. From that point on I remained blindfolded until my release, with the exception of the time I spent inside the cell.

14. Inside the prison I entered a building. They sat me on a chair for about two hours. My medication was in my pocket. (At my house I wanted to take my medication because of my heart problem. They said I could bring it but I would not be able to take the medication inside the cell.) Under the blindfold I could only see feet coming and going. I also saw a number of computer cases with the names of their owners who were arrested earlier. I precisely remember Mohammad Reza Moqiseh’s computer because the case was right next to my chair.

15. After two hours someone came and took me inside a room to change my clothes. They gave me prison clothes, a towel, a pair of slippers, a toothbrush, toothpaste, soap and a small bottle of shampoo.  I was blindfolded again and taken to another room where they took my photo. Then they took me back to the same room where the computer cases were. I sat there for another half an hour until an agent came and put me inside a Peugeot and drove away. On the way I asked the agent if I was being taken to Section 209 or 240? He said 240.

16. When I entered Section 240, they walked me up the stairs to the second floor and put me in cell number 24. I was in this cell for a month. The area of the cell was about 16 feet by 7 feet, or about 1.5 meters by 2 meters. There was a corroded metal toilet without a lid and a sink in the corner. The room had recently been painted and the fresh smell [of the paint] gave me a headache. I had three army blankets. I used one as a pillow and another as a bed cover.

17. I was only allowed to contact my family once and that was for just one minute on the first night. But they told me I am not allowed to say where I am. I could only tell my family that I am in prison and not to worry. An agent stood by as I was talking on the phone. After that I was not allowed any visits.

18. On one occasion during my detention, they took me to the Section 4 interrogator’s office at Evin where I was charged and issued a standard arrest warrant which I signed. I was blindfolded there as well. This was on the day of my arrest or the next day. There were three charges against me: participating in gatherings with the intention of overthrowing the state, causing public disorder by participating in gatherings, and publishing lies in my blog and giving interviews to the media.

19. I spent 27 days in the solitary cell. The last three days was in a suite which was a room that measured 3 x 4 meters, or maybe 2 x 3 meters, with five people in it. One of them was Ehsan Abdoh Tabrizi[3] who had been given a ten-year sentence. Later on I also saw him in Section 350. One of the others was a student from Karaj who had been taken hostage. The Intelligence Ministry agents were looking for his cousin but could not find him so they arrested this man instead and told his family to hand over the cousin. He was held hostage for a month and a half. There was also another prisoner whose name was Hossein who had been sentenced to six months in prison. He had also participated in demonstrations. There was another person in this cell. He was not political at all. All he had done was send a text message to the BBC’s sports program.

Phone tapping by the Intelligence Ministry

20. A month before the elections all phone conversations were tapped. I discovered this during interrogations. I had two SIM cards in my name, one was Irancell and the other one was Hamrah-e Avval. Both of my SIM cards had been tapped. I did not work in secret and I used those phones to give interviews. I also used the same phones to set up meetings. In other words I did not pay attention to security considerations. But I did not use email for any kind of communication.

21. My interrogator once brought up a subject and asked what sort of relationship I had with, let’s say, Ms. X.  I had never seen the person mentioned by the interrogator. She lived in another city and we only communicated by phone. They could not trace us except through the phone. The reason is that we did not have any internet communication by email, Facebook messages or anything else online. That’s how I realized my phone conversations had been recorded. That woman had not been arrested so I don’t think she had said anything about our conversations which took place a month or two after the elections.

22. Another example was the conversations I had with two Voice of America and BBC reporters. Those parts of the interviews that were published were available and accessible but my conversations with reporters before and after interviews could not have been known other than by phone surveillance. The reporters had asked to interview me about an Intelligence Ministry directive regarding the cooperation of 60 organizations with foreign countries. I did not agree to an interview but I recommended two others and said they could ask them for an interview and they might agree to talk about this topic. My interrogator mentioned all these conversations to me. The interrogator asked why I had not agreed to give an interview to that reporter and instead introduced this or that person? When he clearly asked me this question I understood that my phone conversations were under surveillance.

23. One specific case I would like to mention is regarding Abdolreza Ghanbari. The only thing they had against him, other than his own confessions which he gave after being tricked and threatened by promises made by his interrogator, was the interview he had given for a couple of minutes to Mojahedin-e Khalgh’s Azadi TV. They didn’t have anything else against him. He called this TV station on the day of Ashoura [a religious day for Shi’a Muslim]. He received the death sentence because of this interview.[4]

24. They had also told me about a number of phone conversations I had with my family. Unfortunately after the elections certain European companies, such as Nokia and Siemens as well as others whose names I cannot remember, had given the Islamic Republic the technology to easily control telephones.

Interrogations

25. My first interrogation session lasted 11 hours. I was interrogated a total of five or six times. The second session began from 4-5 p.m. in the afternoon until 10-12 p.m. at night. Another was from 9 a.m. in the morning until 10-11 p.m. at night. Another session was in the morning. They would come from 7-8 a.m. in the morning until the afternoon.

26. The interrogations had two parts. One concerned my activities before the elections and the other concerned my activities after the elections and the participation in gatherings and contacts with foreign media. They themselves claimed that these are not interrogation sessions. And in fact they were not. It was more like an inquisition, or in their words “clarifying ambiguities”.

27. I had three interrogators. The first was part of the group who arrested me. When he came into the room his first question was, “Wherever you go you say you don’t believe in Velayat-e Faqih.[5] Why is that?” I noticed his voice is very familiar and I told him so. He said I was mistaken and I had never seen him. I lifted the blindfold to write something. I turned around and saw him. He got angry and said I should not have turned around. He didn’t come back for the next session. I don’t know if it was because I recognized him or for some other reason.

28. I had two other interrogators. One of them only appeared for inquisition-like sessions. The other was very experienced. He had a handle on my case. He studied it and was well-informed about my activities. I could neither see him nor did I know his name. I asked him what name I should call him and he said “Anything you like… Haji, Seyed…” He was very professional. He said they had worked for 6-7 months on my case and a few other cases and eventually decided that I should be arrested. In fact I was more comfortable with this interrogator compared to the one in inquisition sessions. The other interrogator got into annoying theoretical discussions. But this interrogator mostly asked questions about my activities. Overall he wasn’t a bad person, although once or twice he got angry and another person came along to help him and broke my teeth, albeit accidentally. Besides this I did not have a particular problem with him.

29. In one of the sessions where the professional interrogator and another one were present the first one asked which “disturbances” I had participated in. I said, “If you mean which gatherings, I was in all of them.” He said “You have to put that in writing.” They brought an interrogation paper and wrote down, “In which disturbances in Tehran were you present?” [The Persian word for “disturbances” had been misspelled with a “kh” instead of “gh.”] They told me to write the answer. I wrote “None.” I gave the piece of paper and he became very angry. He said, “You so and so! Didn’t you just say you took part in all of them? Do you think this is a joke?” I said, “If you mean whether I was in disturbances with a ‘gh’ I was in all of them. But I wasn’t in any disturbances with a ‘kh’.” He got very angry and pulled my hair from the back of my head and banged it against the chair handle two or three times. The chair was the type with a hand-rest used in schools. My lips and teeth struck the side of the chair and I broke four of my teeth. They then took me to my cell in that condition, with a bloody mouth, without taking me to the clinic. For two days I was given a painkiller every five or six hours but I was never taken to the clinic.

30. On the 21st day of my detention I went on a hunger strike and I kept it going for six days. I have a weak body and in any case solitary detention makes you lose weight because the meal portions are small and you are under a lot of psychological pressure. There was nothing left of me after the fifth day of the hunger strike.

31. Eventually on the night of the 27th day of my detention they came and asked if I would like to leave my cell and go to another where I would not be alone? I agreed. They came after an hour and a half and took me to the fourth floor inside a suite where I finally saw a few people after 27 days. That was the best night of my life when I saw a few people after 27 days. I was there for three days and then released.

Freedom

32. My freedom came when a day before my release they came to take me at 8 or 9 p.m. at night. They opened the cell door and told me to contact my family and ask them to bring a property deed for bail. The prison had become very crowded at that time and a few people were set free almost every day. I was on the fourth floor at the end of Section 240 and from there we could see a few people being released every night. Usually they would release people at 10 or 11 p.m. at night. The day after my family bailed me out, they opened my cell at 11 p.m. at night and told me to get ready and wear my blindfold. My friends began to clap and cheer and I said goodbye to them. Then they brought me inside a hall. There were 10 or 12 of us. They put us inside cars and took us to the same place where we had changed clothes on the first day. They handed over my clothes. They said my laptop had to be analyzed. I was blindfolded at all times until we reached the prison gate.

33. After I was released I was summoned twice to the Intelligence Ministry’s referrals office. On one occasion, they called me and said I should come to the Intelligence Ministry’s referrals office at 2 p.m. in the afternoon. When I went there two agents of the Ministry introduced themselves. One of them was very rude. He was tall and wore glasses.  The other was bearded, of medium height, and played the role of the “nice” guy. We talked for about four to six hours. They wanted to scare me. They said they had shown mercy by letting me go after a month and that they could keep me for a much longer time. They told me I should not take part in any activities and cooperate with them. What they really wanted from me was to write a letter of repentance and ask to be pardoned. I said I would not do it. They said they could have detained me but instead I had been summoned there nicely. Still I refused to repent and told them they can detain me if they want to.

34. The second time I was summoned was 20 days before my second detention in 2010. This time they told me I must repent in writing.  I refused. They said if I don’t they would open a new case against me.

Second Detention

35. Fifteen days later, on October 4, 2010, I received a summons from the 4th branch of the Shaheed Moghaddas prosecutor’s office located in Evin prison. I informed Dr. Dadkhah[6], my lawyer. He said this was probably related to my first detention and they wanted me to give my final defense and send my file to the court. Since my release I had not done anything at all. My blog had been blocked and I had not given any interviews. I did not want to give them any excuse. My summons stated that I should present myself to provide explanations about certain things. This was my understanding. I did not even say goodbye to my family when I went to the 4th branch of the prosecutor’s office on October 9, 2010.

36. The prosecutor’s assistant told me there was a new charge against me. I asked—why? I had not taken part in any activities.  He said when he studied my file he noticed he had forgotten to include another charge. At that point I realized this was related to the threat by the Intelligence Ministry agents to open a new case against me when I went to see them at the referrals office and they had demanded a written plea for pardon.

37. I asked the official: what is the charge against me? “Insulting the president,” he said. In my blog I had referred to the president as “the head of the coup d’etat government” 52 times, he added. These people have nothing better to do than count each one, I said to myself. My file contained 100 to 150 pages from my blog and they had underlined parts that could lead to charges against me.

38. The official told me I should not be worried. Insulting the president carried a penalty of no more than 300,000 tomans [approximately $ US 300 in 2010]. He then set bail at 50 million tomans [approximately $ US 50,000 in 2010]. I said I had paid bail once before but he renewed it and said I could go if I paid the entire 50 million tomans. I said I could not come up with such a sum at that moment and would need at least a day. He said in that case I would be detained until bail was paid.

39. They first took me to the quarantine room at Evin prison. I spent the worst day of my life there. Quarantine is a place where all new prisoners, despite the nature of their crimes, have to spend a couple of nights. Afterwards, they are transferred to other wards. For this reason I spent one night among murderers, addicts, thieves, hustlers and other such prisoners which was the worst mental torture for me. I asked the guard to transfer me to a solitary cell but they kept me there for 24 hours. Political prisoners were usually not kept in quarantine and were taken to Section 350. But they kept three of us there and transferred us to Section 350 the day after.

Section 350

40. When I was transferred to Section 350, I told my friends I probably would not be their “guest” for more than a couple of days and would be released after my bail was paid.

41. Three days later I heard my name and Majid Dorri’s paged on the loudspeaker. They said I should wear nice clothes to go to the prosecutor’s office. My friends said my bail had probably been paid and I would be freed. I kissed them goodbye and collected letters and messages for their families. I was going to wear shoes but the guard said I should go with slippers. I said my bail had been paid. He said I should go to court and if bail had been paid I would come back and take my belongings.

42. At the prosecutor’s office I was told there was a new charge against me. I said how could there be a new charge when I had been in prison for three days? He said after closer examination of my file I had “committed blasphemy and questioned Islamic laws.” On what basis? I asked. He said I had written a weblog against stoning. I said: keep me in prison if you want to but don’t fabricate charges. He said my bail had been raised to 300 million tomans [approximately $ US 300,000 in 2010]. I realized they don’t want to let me go because I was not released even when the increased bail was going to be paid.

43. I was in Section 350 of Evin prison from October 10, 2010.  At that time there were 150 or 160 people imprisoned there. We ran everything ourselves: the library, the store, as well as the sports hall which had been built by our guys. There was a table in this section which we named the “Page Table”. Whenever they wanted to count the inmates or needed to call up the inmates for something else they would page them from this table. Three other inmates and I were put in charge of the Page Table a week after I came to the section. Every day the list of inmates arrived at this table and we had it. I remember most of the names. When I was released there were about 160 inmates. The number always fluctuated between 150 and 160 because some went on furlough and some were released.

44. I was in Room 3. It had the highest number of deaths in those two years. All those who were executed or had died had been kept in Room 3. Mr. Hoda Saber was in this room.[7] His bed was above mine.  Mr. Dokmehchi’s bed was below mine when he was in Section 350.[8] He had cancer and died. Mr. Jafar Kazemi and Mr. Mohammad Haj Aghaie were both executed.[9] Ali Akbar Siadat was executed on charges of spying.[10] Abdolreza Ghanbari, who has been sentenced to death, was also in our room.

45. I remember Mr. Mohsen Dokmehchi. At the time we did not know he had cancer but he was in great pain and could not eat. He went through a lot. In the middle of the night he would wake up and ask me to give him some bread and cheese. He could not eat anything during the day. The prison authorities would not take him to the clinic unless he was in a lot of pain and even then they would only inject him with painkillers and send him back. If he had been checked in time preventive steps could have been administered and he would have at least lived longer.

46. At that time there was a doctor in our section named Dr. Faraji. There were two brothers, Hassan and Hossein Faraji who were in prison on charges of espionage. One of them was released but the other is still in prison. Without any medical equipment Dr. Faraji did a check up on Dokmehchi and thought that he may have a stomach problem.

47. Every day ten inmates from Section 350 went to the clinic to see a doctor. If they had a headache or a cold we would tell them to fake two other ailments so that they could get medicines for others to use. In Section 350 there was an inmate, Dr. Fardoust, who was in charge of medicine. He would collect all the drugs. With these drugs we could calm Mohsen Dokmehchi’s pain a little. At the time we did not know he had cancer.  After I had been released they took him to hospital and tests showed he had cancer. But it was too late and the cancer had progressed too far.

48. Of the 150 or 160 prisoners who were kept in Section 350, at least 50 of them were mentioned in the media and there was activity surrounding their cases. Many of the prisoners who had been arrested during demonstrations had no specific political activities. News about some of the prisoners would leak out and get published through their families. The complete list of Section 350 inmates leaked out a couple of times and got published in Kaleme web site. For instance I was in charge of the Page Table and I took the list of names with me when I was released and it got published. The media would not pay much attention to those prisoners who did not have a political background.

Branch 26 of Tehran Revolutionary Court – Judge Pirabbasi

49. My trial was held 52 days after my arrest. They took me from the cell to Judge Pirabbasi at Branch 26. Gholamreza Khosravi and I went together. Our hands were in handcuffs. Pirabbasi wore glasses. He had a short beard and dark skin. He was [seemingly] kind and gentle. He seemed to be 45 to 55 years old. He treated me well.

50. Pirabbasi’s secretary’s name was Sattari and he was very ill-tempered, so much so that I had heard he had been appointed by the Intelligence Ministry to keep an eye on Pirabbasi. He treated me, Gholamreza Khosravi and two other defendants, badly.

51. On that day Gholamreza Khosravi did not see the judge because his sentence had already been issued and they only had to announce it to him. When he came into the court Pirabbasi’s assistant made a snide remark and said, “Here’s your sentence. God willing you’ve been sentenced to death.” Gholamreza looked at me and said, laughing, “After two or three years of confusion I finally know my fate.”

52. Perhaps Pirabbasi had a guilty conscience that day for sentencing Gholamreza Khosravi to death. He took me inside the room, gave me a cup of tea and closed the door. He pulled up his pants and showed me his injured leg. I don’t know if he had been hurt in the war with Iraq or what, but he said he had made his leg an excuse and skipped work for two months so that they would not give him new court cases. He swore to God that Gholamreza did not deserve the death penalty but “they forced me to sentence him to death.” He told me that Gholamreza had already been sentenced in Rafsanjan Revolutionary Court to six years’ imprisonment so it was not possible to issue a new sentence for him with the same accusation. Judge Pirabbasi added that for this reason his court had a lack of jurisdiction to review this case. But the moharebeh (or “warring against God”) accusation had been added to Gholamraza’s case so that he would be eligible to be sentenced to death. Then his case was brought to Judge Pirabbasi again and the Judge was forced to sentence Gholamreza to death for this new accusation.

Pirabbasi also said that 80 percent of the prisoners in Section 350 of Evin prison were innocent.”

53. Pirabbasi also said that 80 percent of the prisoners in Section 350 of Evin prison were innocent. These are the things he told me and I relayed them to Hoda Saber when I went back to my cell. Saber mentioned this in a letter he wrote to Mr. Sahabi and Dr. Zarafshan.

54. I asked Pirabbasi why he was doing this? Why didn’t he go home and refuse to work? He said he sat home for two months and if he had not come to the court that day my case would have been decided by Judge Salavati or Judge Moghiseh. They would have sentenced me to nine or ten years instead of five. He showed me the Intelligence Ministry’s report in my file which demanded a prison sentence of at least nine years. But he said he had sentenced me to five years and now he had to answer to the Intelligence Ministry. I realized he was right. They were all bad but it was better for Pirabbasi to be there because his sentencing was milder compared to Salavati or Moghiseh.

55. He read five charges against me. I could not deny them because they were all based on what I had written in my blogs and I had accepted responsibility for all of them. Also my interviews with the BBC and Voice of America were undeniable. Nevertheless I said none of the things I had said were against the law. They could only stick me with propaganda against the state and the maximum penalty for that was a year in prison. I said I accept this charge based on what I had written. “No! The punishment for that is one year. I will clear you of that charge but will sentence you to five years for participation and collaboration in protest gatherings,” he said.

56. On that day Judge Pirabbasi sentenced me to five years in prison and asked whether I had any objections. I said I did not have any objections because I did not recognize the court or his judgment.

57. It was a bad day for me. First because Gholamreza had been sentenced to death and secondly when I was in Pirabbasi’s room someone who apparently worked for another branch court knocked on the door and came inside. He went in front of Pirabbasi and said, “Do you know about Saeed Malekpour’s sentence?” Pirabbasi said no, what was it? “Death sentence!” he said. When I heard the news I fell apart and forgot about my own case.

58. When I left the room Pirabbasi called me in again and said he would give me a five-year suspended sentence, “any objections now?” I said I object. A suspended sentence was really bad because I would be under constant stress for five years. “Let’s say I would be free for four years and 364 days and then on the last day they accuse me of something and throw me in jail for five years.” So on this basis I objected, hoping that the court of appeals would reduce the sentence. Judge Pirabbasi told me to contact my family to pay the bail so that I could be released from prison that day.

59. When I went back to my cell Saeed Malekpour had not yet been informed about his death sentence. I told him. It was a really bad day to hear that two of my friends had been sentenced to death. I was set free that night.

60. I was in Section 350 for 52 days. I was freed on bail until the appeal. My sentence in the appeals court was changed to four years’ imprisonment plus a three year suspended sentence. So in fact the punishment was increased. When the sentence was finalized I received a summons to present myself to begin my four-year term but I left the country in February 2011.

Palestinian Rosa Parks? Segregated Bus Lines Open in Israel

By Dylan Takores
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

JERUSALEM, Israel – Beginning this week, the Israeli Transportation Ministry instituted two new bus lines designed to separate Israelis from Palestinian passengers, prompting both criticism and praise within the country.

 

Palestinian workers wait for the new buses. (Photo Courtesy of EPA)

 

The new lines, operated by Afikim Bus Company, are officially designated as “general bus lines,” but the service only travels to Palestinian villages.  Additionally, the supposedly “public” buses are only advertised in Palestinian areas of the West Bank.

The Ministry cited growing concerns and complaints regarding overcrowding and the safety of passengers on shared bus lines to justify its decision to create the new system.  Further, the Ministry avoided classifying the lines as “Palestinian-only,” claiming that the lines are intended to benefit both Israelis and Palestinians by relieving tension and overcrowding.

Many have responded to the new system with harsh criticism.  Jessica Montell of B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights group, called the plan to separate buses “appalling.”  Montell argued that the Ministry’s justification is an attempt to “camouflage the blatant racism of the demand to remove Palestinians from buses.”

Equally outraged, the Israeli activist group Peace Now likened the system to the racially segregated services in the United States during the civil rights era.

The Palestinian Workers’ Union referred to the system as a “racist measure” and pointed out that the buses leave Palestinians open to attacks.  This concern quickly became a reality.  Yesterday, the first day of operation, assailants set fire to two of the buses.  The identity of the assailants is unknown, but police sources believe that the act was means of protest.

However, there are some who believe the new system will be an improvement.  Khalil, a day laborer from Hebron, explained that the new buses are less expensive.  Additionally, the Transportation Ministry believes that the new buses will cut back on “pirate” van drivers who charge excessive fees to transport workers unable to get a spot on overcrowded buses.

Herzl Ben-Zvi, mayor of Karnei Shamron, maintains that the decrease in overcrowding will benefit both Israelis and Palestinians alike.

Nevertheless, protests persisted today, the second day of operation.  Palestinian officials continue to criticize the Ministry’s implementation of bus lines.  In a statement to AFP, Deputy Labor Minister Assef Said condemned the decision as a “racist policy of segregation.”

 

For further information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Israel’s Palestinian-only buses torched – 5 March 2013

Al Jazeera – Israel launches segregated bus service – 4 March 2013

Haaretz – As Israel’s separate bus lines start rolling, some Palestinians don’t seem to mind – 4 March 2013

Ynet – Separate but equal bus lines? – 4 March 2013

Huffington Post – Israel ‘Palestinian Only’ Bus Lines Launched in West Bank, Security Risks Cited – 3 March 2013