ICTJ: In Focus: “If You Don’t Believe in Human Rights, Why Are You in Journalism?”

ICTJ ICTJ In Focus 62
November 2016

In Focus

Divider

“If You Don’t Believe in Human Rights, What Are You Doing in Journalism?” du Preez on Transitional Justice and Media“If You Don’t Believe in Human Rights, What Are You Doing in Journalism?” du Preez on Transitional Justice and MediaLater this month, Tunisians will have an opportunity to hear the truth about the dictatorship’s abuses directly from victims in a series of public hearings hosted by the Truth and Dignity Commission. However, in order for these public testimonies to be effective, the media must cover victims’ stories fully and explore the issues underpinning their experiences. South African journalist Max du Preez spoke with his Tunisian counterparts to help prepare them for the challenges they will face. We sat down with him afterwards to discuss the role of media in transitional justice processes.

Read More…

ICTJ RSS Feed ICTJ on Facebook ICTJ on Twitter ICTJ on YouTube ICTJ Podcast
Subscribe
SUBSCRIBE
Like ICTJ | In Focus: "If You Don't Believe in Human Rights, Why Are You in Journalism?" on Facebook
Forward to a Friend
Do you know someone that may be interested in the ICTJ newsletter?
Forward this Email
View Newsletter Archive

Other News

Divider

Cote d’Ivoire Youth Find Voice Through StorytellingCote d’Ivoire Youth Find Voice Through StorytellingIn Cote d’Ivoire, avenues for education system reform are limited. To help youth find their voice, ICTJ and UNICEF facilitated an innovative truth-telling project led by Ivorian young people themselves. The result: an exploration of the unique experiences of young people during the conflict, told through radio broadcasts, public discussions and reports to government officials.

Read More…

Transitional Justice in Ukraine: National Reconciliation or Reconsolidation of Post-Communist Trauma?Transitional Justice in Ukraine: National Reconciliation or Reconsolidation of Post-Communist Trauma?Ukraine’s Maidan Revolution in 2014 ushered in a wave of decommunization efforts, ostensibly in order to ensure respect for human rights and to prevent a recurrence of the crimes of Communist and Nazi regimes. However, the laws were largely a product of contentious politics of memory: they further a particular understanding of past events that will likely continue to fuel division and distrust among Ukrainians, and between Ukraine and Russia.

Read More…

Divider

Publications

Divider

Prospects for Justice in Myanmar: Does the New Political Reality Offer Opportunities for Addressing Violations?

In the years immediately before the 2015 election, there was a palpable sense of waiting among those working in Burmese civil society. Many of their plans depended on one or two critical developments to take hold: the NLD coming to power and the signing of a nationwide ceasefire agreement. Now, both long-hoped-for events have happened, and Myanmar’s transition to democratic rule continues to move slowly forward. But what opportunities exist to address human rights violations?

Handbook on Complementarity

Where should justice for some of the world’s worst crimes be done? In national courts or at the International Criminal Court in The Hague? Our new Handbook on Complementarity explores those questions, laying out the interconnected relationship between the ICC and national court systems in the global fight against impunity.

More Publications

Upcoming Events

December 01, 2016

Confronting Evil: Engaging Our Responsibility to Prevent GenocideLocation: Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, 55 5th Ave View Details

December 01 – 03, 2016

Confronting Violent Pasts and Historical (In)Justice Location: Amsterdam, NetherlandsView Details

More Events

Author: Shelby Vcelka

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *