By Shayne R. Burnham
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

AFGHANISTAN – Human Rights Watch claims that the U.S. investigation into the August 2008 air strikes on western Afghanistan was “deeply flawed” and thereby casts doubt over the military’s commitment to reduce civilian casualties.

On October 1, 2008, the Department of Defense published a summary of a report by Brigadier General Michael Callan of the August air strikes in Azizabad.

Following the summary, Human Rights Watch conducted its own investigations into the matter.

“The weaknesses in the Callan Report Summary call into question the depth of the Defense Department’s commitment to institute reforms that would reduce civilian casualties,” Human Rights Watch said in a letter to U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Separate investigations were conducted by the United Nations (UN), the Afghani government, and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission.  Their investigations concluded that about 78 to 92 civilians were killed, whereas the Callan summary only reported five to seven.

After receiving much criticism by the UN and Afghani government, and the release of video footage demonstrating a high number of civilian deaths, the U.S. conducted its own investigation led by General Callan.

As a result, the Callan summary accepted that 33 civilians were killed, failing to recognize the numbers arrived at by the UN and government of Afghanistan and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commision; criticized their methodology; failing to acknowledge flaws in their own assessments, and; disimissing villager testimony.

The UN backs the government of Afghanistan.

“This is a matter of grave concern to the United Nations.  I have repeatedly made clear that the safety and welfare of civilians must be considered above all else during the planning and conduct of all military operations.  The impact of such operations undermines the trust and confidence of the Afghan people in efforts to build a just, peaceful and law-abiding state,” stated Kai Eide, the UN special envoy to Afghanistan.

Human Rights Watch, Asia Director Brad Adams stated, “There was great hope in Afghanistan that the Callan report would provide a credible and detailed analysis of the Azizabad airstrikes, place blame where it gell, lead to appropriate disciplinary action, and result in operational changes that would avoid such tragedies in the future.  Unfortunately, this has not happened.”

This year, there is an expected 30,000 increase in U.S. troops in Afghanistan and the civilian death toll could increase if military procedures remain unchanged.

For more information, please see:

Guardian – Afghanistan Demands End to NATO Air Strikes on Villagers – 26 August 2008

Human Rights Watch – Afghanistan:  U.S. Investigation of Airstrike Deaths ‘Deeply Flawed’ – 15 January 2009

Human Rights Watch – Troops in Contact:  Air Strikes and Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan – 8 September 2008

Reuters – U.S. Probe into Afghan Civil Deaths “Flawed” – 15 January 2009