News

Uruguayan Supreme Court Judge Unprecedented Resignation Leads To Court Granting Technical Immunity

By Brendan Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America 

MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay – The resignation of Uruguay’s Supreme Court Justice Marina Moto sent shockwaves through the country. Not simply due to the Justices’ unparalleled transfer from the criminal sector to the civilian court, but because Judge Moto had been the main driving force behind the investigations of crimes against humanity during the military governments control of the country from 1973-1985.

Judge Mota has inexplicably resigned her Supreme Court Criminal Judgeship for the the civil judgeship.(Photo Courtesy of BBC)

Human rights defenders and groups throughout Uruguay and Argentina have protested the change, citing Mota as one of the most significant contributors in trials against military and civilians related to war crimes. She had more than 50 open cases under investigation at the time of her transfer.

Her transfer triggered wide spread reaction, Human rights officials organized a joint-protest at Mota’s ascension to the civil judgeship. Some 300 protestors came to show their disapproval for her shift, and of a new controversial Supreme Court ruling that declared unconstitutional a law that prevented the statute of limitations on crimes committed during the military regime. There were clashes at the protest requiring police action to evict some of the unruly protestors.

The court’s ruling which repealed law 18,831 has effectively nullified investigations into military personal accused of human rights violations and granted technical immunity to those accused. The court justified its ruling that abuses committed during the military regime cannot be considered crimes against humanity, because at the time the crimes were committed, there were not considered crimes against humanity within the Latin American country.

The Uruguayan military dictatorship is accused of forcibly disappearing some 200 people. Thousands of others may have been arbitrarily detained and tortured. According to data, Uruguay had one of the highest rates of political prisoners per capita in the world in the 1970s.

Alberto Pérez Pérez, who currently serves as a judge of the Inter-American court of Human Rights has stated that if the Supreme Court ruled 18, 831 unconstitutional, than the country would be in violation of international law.

While Moto claims she has no reason to explain herself, Enrique Rubio a member of the Uruguayan Senate plans to call the justice before parliament to justify her actions. While a Supreme Court Justice has never called a justice before them since the fall of the dictatorship, the parliament lacks a legal means to force a compulsory presence from a Supreme Court Justice. Despite not being able to force a meeting, Rubio has referred to the meeting as an extension of an invitation to explain herself.

For further information, please see:

BBC Mundo – Uruguay: Protests At Supreme Court For Ruling On Human Rights Cases – 25 February 2013

BBC Mundo – How Are Cases Of Abuse Of DD.HH. In Uruguay – 23 February 2013

BBC Mundo – Uruguay: Judge Transfer Sweeping The World Of DD.HH. – 22 February 2013

Pulsa Merica – Uruguay: Human Rights Judge Mota Transferred To Civil Court Duties – 17 February 2013

 

Sudan Judicially Orders Amputation of Convict’s Limbs

KHARTOUM, Sudan – For the first time since 2001, government doctors were judicially ordered to amputate a man’s right hand and left foot as punishment for the crime he was convicted of.

Corporal punishment has been part of Sudanese law since 1983. (Photo courtesy of AFP/File, Ashraf Shazly)

30-year-old Adam Al-Muthna was convicted of armed robbery under article 167 of the 1991 Sudanese Penal Code. Under the same law, the penalty for such an offense is cross amputation. So, on February 14 Muthna was brought to the Sudanese Ministry of Interior’s Al Rebat Hospital and had his limbs cut off.

The Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), along with the African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies (ACJPS), Human Rights Watch, and REDRESS, cried that the amputation was against the credo of the medical profession. “Cross amputation is a form of state-sponsored torture,” said Dr. Vincent Iacopino, senior medical advisor at Physicians for Human Rights. “The complicity of medical personnel in such practices represents a gross contravention of the UN Principles of Medical Ethics for health personnel, particularly medical doctors who engage, actively or passively, in acts of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

According to the executive director of ACJPS, Osman Hummaida, “amputations violate the absolute prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment under international law and have no place in any criminal justice system.”

Thus, hoping to convince the Sudanese government to reform its penal laws, the PHR, ACJPS, Human Rights Watch and Redress came together to demand not only Sudan, but international actors as well, to condemn the practice immediately.

“Authorities should immediately stop imposing such cruel and inhuman punishments, and bring laws in line with Sudan’s human rights obligations,” said Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “They should stop ordering amputations, stoning, flogging and all other forms of corporal punishment that violate basic human rights.”

Dr. Lutz Oette, Counsel at REDRESS added that corporal punishments are “frequently used as an instrument of repression against those who do not conform to the State’s conception of moral order.” She said that this was contrary to the ruling in Doebbler v Sudan, concerning the use of flogging as a punishment in Sudan. In that case, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights ruled that: “there is no right for the government of a country to apply physical violence to individuals for offences. Such a right would be tantamount to sanctioning State sponsored torture contrary to article 5 of the African Charter.”

In 1996, Sudan signed, but has yet to ratify, the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

 

For further information, please see:

AFP – Sudan man’s foot, hand ‘amputated’ by court order – 28 February 2013

France Diplomatie – Sudan – Court ordered amputation – 28 February 2013

Radio Dabanga – Sudanese Doctors Union condemn reintroduction of cutting hand and foot – 28 February 2013

UPI – Rights groups blast Sudan amputation – 28 February 2013

All Africa – Sudan Doctors Carry Out Court Ordered Amputation Sentence – 27 February 2013

Human Rights Watch – Sudan: Doctors Perform Amputations for Courts – 27 February 2013

Reuters – Sudan cuts off hand, foot of man convicted of robbery: activists – 27 February 2013

Brazilian Police Storm Rio Slums In Preparation For Soccer

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BRASILIA, Brazil – The allure of the world cup draws near, and Brazil has taken drastic actions to prepare Rio de Janeiro before crowds and crowds of people descend upon the city. After the relative success of past military incursions into the favelas, or to put it more aptly, slums of Rio, police, tanks and military units stormed multiple favelas over the past months in order to reestablish control over the population.

Brazilian police and military storm Rio’s slums in order to pacify the areas before the World Cup arrives next year. (Photo Courtesy of AFP)

Previously drug backed gangs took control of the slums and the people languished in poverty without access to many basic necessities. Since the military occupation, spokesmen claim that the pacification has benefited over 400,000 impoverished people, with another 1.1 million people left that could still benefit. The overall plan is to provide social services and improve the quality of care of those at risk while quashing any illegal activity that could harm their reputation when FIFA and the Olympic Committee arrive to assess the suitability of Brazils shinning gem that is Rio de Janeiro.

The operation which began in earnest back in January, represents a massive shift to clean up the slums. Early last week, a Brazilian Police force supported by military tanks and helicopters stormed gang occupied slums near Rio’s international airport. Fortunately most of the pacification incursions have gone without a hitch. The police have taken to celebrate their victories by raising the Rio’s and Brazil’s flags on the roofs of buildings, symbolizing the end of the drug traffickers dominion over the impoverished parts of the city.

Critics of the operation state that while the pacification program is effective, the favelas targeted are not the poorest areas, and are simply focused on areas that would be popular during the World Cup and the Olympic Games. Civilians living within the favelas have had different reactions to the pacification. Some note that while there is less major crime, petty crime has increases as they no longer fear retaliation from local crime bosses.

After the pacification of the controlling gangs, staff from Rio’s municipal authority could start entering the areas safely without fear, and begun implementation of new social services, such as schools, healthcare centers and trash collection. Eduara La Rocque, president of the Instituto Pereira Passos has noted that there are over 150 new schools within the favelas as well as formalizing the area into the confines of Rio’s boundaries and maps. Ms. Law Rocque has hoped to implement many new training courses so the previously disenfranchised can acquire legitimate work experience in the future.

However because of the lack of resistance from drug traffickers many believe that the gangs have simply been relocating to other favelas, or to towns outside Rio, effectively just spreading out the problem.

For further information, please see:

Publico – Brazilian Police Occupy Slums 13 – 3 March 2013

Voice of Russia – Brazil: Police Occupied The Favelas In Rio De Janeiro – 3 March 2013

Terra – Police Ranks Near The Slums Of Rio De Janeiro Airport – 3 March 2013

BBC – Rio’s Shanty Towns Spread Their Wings – 8 February 2013

Bolivian Soldiers Detained in Chile Released After a Month

By Pearl Rimon
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

SUCRE, Bolivia – An agreement reached between the district attorney of Tarapacá, Chile and the defense for the Bolivian soldiers arrested in Chile earlier this month, allows for the soldiers to return to Bolivia after more than a month of being detained in Chile. The soldiers were accused of illegal entry into Chile armed with weapons, which has strained the already tense relations between the countries.

The recently released soldiers united with their families after detainment. (Photo Courtesy of AP)

The soldiers are José Luis Fernández Choque (18), Augusto Cárdenas (19), and Alex Choque Quispe (20). The soldiers were arrested on January 25, as they chased suspected car smugglers. The Chilean Court changed their ruling of holding the soldiers in custody until their trial dates to allowing Cárdenas and Choque’s release on bail and Fernández’s release to house arrest. Fernández was the only one charged with possession of weapons.

The deal between the two sides allows for the soldiers to return to Bolivia on the condition that they do no return to Chile for a year, in exchange, prosecutors will drop the charges against the soldiers.

“What progress has been made is exactly what the soldiers requested publically in the sense that there is equal treatment for all,” said Celedón, a lawyer for the soldiers.

After the new agreement was made public, the district attorney for the Tarapacá Region, Manuel Guerra, explained why it had not been reached earlier.

The reasoning behind the long negotiations is explained by district attorney Manuel Guerra,“It was important to verify that the soldiers consent to the terms…They are the ones who have to say if they accept or don’t accept the deal offered by the [prosecution.] We don’t want to generate situations which can hinder the possibility of agreement.”

Bolivian President, Evo Morales, demands that the Chilean military should issue an apology for the detainment. While Chilean Foreign Minister, Alfredo Moreno, urged for the Bolivian military to instruct the soldiers to refrain from illegally crossing the border.

The agreement was made public a day after the Chilean Senate announced that a commission of senators were to travel to Bolivia in an attempt to improve relations.

Relations between Chile and Bolivia have historically been strained due to Bolivia trying to reclaim the Pacific coastline territory that it lost to Chile during the 1879-1884 war. President Morales wrote to Chilean President Pinera and accused him of wanting to keep Bolivia “geographically amputated, economically weak and socially dependent” by “blocking our legitimate right to access to the sea.”

 

For more information, please see:

BBC News — Bolivian Soldiers Held in Chile Return Home – 01 March 13

Prensa Latina — Bolivian President Praises Liberation of Soldiers – 01 March 13

Santiago Times — Bolivian Soldiers Held in Chile to Return Home After Tense Stay – 28 Feb 13

Global Post — Bolivia-Chile Tensions Rise Over Border Incident – 25 Feb 13

UN Appeals Court Overturns War Crimes Conviction

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands – On Thursday, a United Nations appeals court overturned Momcilo Perisic’s, former Yugoslav Army chief, conviction of war crimes. He was originally sentenced to 27 years for aiding and abetting killings in Bosnia and Croatia, including attacks on Sarajevo and Srebrenica.

In 2011, Momcilo Perisic was convicted of aiding and abetting crimes against humanity. (Photo Courtesy of CNN)

In a 4 to 1 decision, the judges ruled that Perisic did not order Serbian forces into Bosnia-Herzegovina to commit war crimes. Furthermore, the judges also determined that he was not in a position to discipline soldiers for attacking the Croatian capital, Zagreb.

During Perisic’s trial, the record showed Perisic regularly attended the Supreme Defense Council’s meetings where Slobodan Milosevic, then the Serbian president, and other leaders approved sending weapons, fuel, police officers and military personnel to fight on behalf of the Serbs in Bosnia and Croatia.

However, the appeals judges said that regardless if Perisic knew about the crimes Serb or pro-Serb fighters committed in Bosnia and Croatia, he did not “directly or knowingly assist” in the atrocities, but rather he made decisions to support the war.

The United Nations appeal court ultimately decided that lower court committed an error by not showing that he was “physically present when criminal acts were planned or committed.”

Theodor Meron, president of the appeals chamber in the tribunal in The Hague, stated, “While Mr Perisic may have known of VRS [Serb Army of Republika Srpska, VRS] crimes, the Yugoslav Army aid he facilitated was directed towards the VRS’s general war effort rather than VRS crimes.”

However, this overturned conviction created some concerns. Various lawyers in The Hague said the ruling confused them.

The court’s ruling, which follows other recent acquittals by appeals court judges, can be seen as changing the story line of war. As a consequence, these recent reversals tightened the definition of crimes for which military commanders can be held responsible.

In the past, the crime of “aiding and abetting” only required knowledge that assistance was being used to commit serious crimes. Yet, the appeals court said that the “intention to commit crimes” is required for a conviction.

Nicholas Koumjian, a lawyer who has worked in several international courts, stated,  “I think this is a step backwards in the law; it contradicts all jurisprudence of this tribunal, even back to the findings of trials at Nuremberg after World War II.”

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia’s appeals chamber in The Hague ordered Perisic’s immediate release.

For further information, please see:

BBC News – Momcilo Perisic: Yugoslav Army Chief Conviction Overturned – 28 February 2013

CNN – Tribunal Reverses Balkan War Crimes Verdict – 28 February 2013

RFE/RL – UN Appeals Court Overturns Ex-Yugoslav Military Chief’s Conviction – 28 February 2013

The New York Times – Court Overturns War Crimes Convictions of Former Chief Yugoslav Army – 28 February 2013