By Heba Girgis
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

MOGADISHU, Somalia—Yesterday, Sunday, March 3, 2013, a Somali appeals court dropped charges against a woman who alleged that she was raped by government security forces and had been convicted of defaming the government.

Somali government soldiers in Mogadishu. The woman’s trial has been linked to media coverage of high levels of rape among government security forces. (Photo Courtesy of The Guardian)

The appeals court Judge Mohamed Hassan Ali said that there was not enough evidence to substantiate the prosecution’s charge. A court last month had sentenced the woman to one year in prison after medical evidence entered into the record showed that perhaps the woman was not raped. Many experts, however, questioned whether Somalia actually has the medical expertise to make this kind of a judgment.

The journalist who interviewed the rape victim was also tried and convicted for defaming the government. His sentence was reduced from one year to six months. The judge stated that the interview was not conducted according to Somali law or Somali journalism ethics.

The verdict against both the journalist and the victim provoked international attention and outcry. Human rights groups including Human Rights Watch said they were not satisfied with the appeals court’s decision. Daniel Bekele, the Africa director for Human Rights Watch said, “The court of appeals missed a chance to right a terrible wrong, both for the journalist and for press freedom in Somalia.” He continued saying, “The government has argued that justice should run its course in this case, but each step has been justice denied.”

The Prime Minister of Somalia, Abdi Farah Shirdon, was happy with this decision and said, “We are a step closer to justice being done.” He had a different opinion when it came to the journalist. He said, “However, I hoping for a different outcome on the journalist. I note his sentence has been reduced from 12 months to six, but I do not believe journalists should be sent to prison for doing their job. We must have freedom of expression, which is guaranteed in our constitution.”

In February, after the convictions, the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon expressed his deep disappointment over the sentences and urged the Somali government, “to ensure that all allegations of sexual violence are investigated fully and perpetrators are brought to justice.”

Experts noted that in confronting violence against women, the original verdict convicting the victim, would discourage Somali women from reporting rape even more than they are already in the conservative Muslim society prevalent in Somalia.

 

For further information, please see:

ABC News – Somalia: Court Clears Woman Convicted in Rape Case – 3 March 2013

Fox News – Appeals Court Clears Woman Convicted in Rape Case that Drew Widespread Condemnation – 3 March 2013

Hiiran Online – Court Clears Woman Woman Convicted in Rape Case – 3 March 2013

The Washington Post – Appeals Court Clears Woman Convicted in Rape Case that Drew Widespread Condemnation – 3 March 2013

Author: Impunity Watch Archive