Syrian Revolution Digest – Wednesday 14 June 2012
THE COMMENTARY IN THIS PIECE DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF IMPUNITY WATCH.
*WARNING VIDEOS MAY CONTAIN GRAPHIC IMAGES*
The Revolutionary Imperative!
Scandal Resurfaces Within South African Police Force
By Tara Pistorese
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa
PRETORIA, South Africa—Yet another South African police official has been replaced after accusations of irregular leasing deals with business tycoon Roux Shabangu surfaced.

President Jacob Zuma fired the police commissioner over claims that leasing contracts for police headquarters were far above market rates. A subsequent investigation found Cele unfit for office, although Cele vows to “clear his name.”
Sunday Times investigative journalists Mzilikazi Wa Afrika and City Press assistant editor Adriaan Basson believe corrupt police officials and politicians are the reason the South African government has failed to address national issues of inequality and poverty.
“In a country like ours where politicians are rated to earn more money, what makes them steal from the poor?” Wa Afrika asked.
But this is not the first time the South African police force has made headlines due to scandal. Cele’s predecessor, Jackie Selebi, is currently serving a fifteen-year sentence for accepting gifts from a convicted drug trafficker in exchange for information about police investigations.
Recently, Nathi Mthethwa, a South African police minister, revealed Selebi was never formally discharged from his police service. Rather, Selebi’s contract came to a natural end when it was simply allowed to lapse in August 2009.
In other words, Selebi has been able to continually draw a pension and state-funded benefits just as he would have had he resigned or been honorably discharged from service.
Similarly, last year, crime intelligence chief Lieutenant-General Richard Mdluli faced charges of fraud and corruption for using crime intelligence funds to buy luxury vehicles.
Corruption within the police force is undermining the public’s faith in law enforcement, which is increasingly important in the face of recent crime rates.
From March 2010 to 2011 almost 16,000 murders were committed in South Africa, making it one of the world’s leaders in intentional homicide. Additionally, South Africa is host to approximately 43 murders per day.
In light of the crime rate, the role of national police commissioner has been called one of the most difficult public positions in South Africa.
In an effort to renew the department, President Zuma appointed Mangwashi “Riya” Phiyega on June 12, making her the first female commissioner in the country’s history. However, this development emerges amid considerable controversy.
As the prior trustee of Nelson Mandela’s foundation and an executive at Barclay-owned banking group Absa, Phiyega has been called a “super administrator.” But she comes into the new position with very little experience in police work.
“We are still reeling from the shock,” an unnamed police official told The South African Star. “We don’t know who this person is.”
According to Institute for Security Studies researcher Johan Burger, this appointment will further corrode public confidence in their leadership, which may be the reason opposition parties and security experts vied for an experienced police officer to take control.
“This shows that the President has no confidence in the police to lead itself,” Burger said.
But Mthethwa believes the appointment evidences Zuma’s commitment to transforming the police force. Similarly, the ANC Women’s League welcomes the appointment.
“We believe having a strong woman at the help of the police service will bring a renewed focus to overcoming the scourge of gender-based violence, such as rape, which has become a growing concern across the country.”
For further information, please see:
Associated Press —South Africa Appoints New Police Chief —13 June 2012
The Guardian —South Africa’s Corruption-Tainted Police Force Gets First Female Chief —13 June 2012
Radio Netherlands-Worldwide, Africa —Axed S. African Police Chief Vows to Clear His Name —13 June 2012
The South African Star —Zuma’s Top Cop Bombshell —13 June 2012
Business Day —Richard Mdluli Suspended-Again—3 June 2012
Daily News—Selebi Still Draws Pension, Benefits—31 May 2012
All Africa—South Africa: ‘Government is Dysfunctional’ Say Investigative Journalists—30 May 2012
OTP Weekly Briefing: Bensouda Visits Norway and will be Sworn in as ICC Prosecutor, Malawi Declines to Host AU Summit
Notes From India: Harsh Realities of Sterilization Camps
Courtney Schuster
Special Contributor, Blog Entry #2
Controlling the population growth in India has become a priority for government officials. Yet, 25% of patients seeking contraception at public health facilities are turned away. Instead, in order to slow the population increase, government hospitals are encouraged to hold sterilization camps. Most sterilization camps are aimed at encouraging women to undergo tubal ligation, though some also perform vasectomies on men. All of the patients are poor and most are considered, Below Poverty Line (BPL). Those with enough money and time, choose to visit the private hospitals.
The Indian government set certain standards for sterilization camps; those standards are similar to what exists in developed countries. For instance there must be: a trained staff of eighteen members; clean running water, a clean operating room with surgical lighting; clean gloves and equipment for each procedure; patients must undergo a pre-operative test during which their vitals must be monitored; and post-operative care must be provided. The camps typically operate from 9 am to 4 pm and a maximum of thirty sterilizations can be performed in that time. Under no circumstances are the camps to be held at school buildings.
Unfortunately, operational sterilization camps fall extremely short of the standards written on paper. One of the cases I have been working on involves a sterilization camp that took place in the state of Bihar. It violated almost every standard set by the Indian government. There was a single doctor and an unqualified staff, totaling only five people. Between 8 pm and 10 pm, operations were performed on a total of fifty-three women. That means that the doctor spent, on average, 2.26 minutes per woman. The camp operated out of a school that had no running water; additionally, no water was supplied to wash hands or sterilize the equipment. There was no blood supplies available in case of an emergency.
The women were even required to buy some of the medical equipment and bring those purchases with them to the surgery. They were not given sterilized clothing to wear and were administered expired anesthetics. They did not undergo a pre-operative check up, nor were they counseled about repercussions and side effects of the operation or alternatives to surgery.
School desks were used as operating tables without any sheets or sterilization. The only light source was a single, dim, generator-powered light bulb. The doctor used the same gloves for multiple procedures. None of the womens’ vital signs were monitored during the procedure.
After the women underwent the procedure, they were placed on a straw mat and left uncovered with no bandages to protect the incision. They did not receive any post-operative care and they were not given a sterilization certificate for their medical records.
This case is just one of the many sterilization camp cases in which HRLN is involved. Unhygienic and poorly run sterilization camps are commonplace in India because the government is pushing states to lower their population growth rate. In turn, state governments are pushing public hospitals to sterilize a substantial portion of the population, at any cost. For example, in the state of, Madhya Pradesh, the goal of 3,000,000 sterilizations in one year was set by the state government. Basic cleanliness and patient health and safety is sacrificed to meet this outrageous goal and pacify both state and federal governments.
It seems odd that family planning via sterilization operation is emphasized since less invasive forms of contraception are available. However, these less invasive methods are rarely promoted. Condoms, hormonal birth control, and IUD’s are almost never handed out or prescribed by doctors around India. Perhaps sterilization camps are so popular because the monetary incentives for operating a camp (totaling 1500 rupees per sterilization) are far more appealing to doctors and health centers than achieving a long-term solution to population growth by promoting the alternative contraceptive techniques available.
Courtney Schuster is a third-year student at Syracuse University College of Law. She is currently working as an intern in India for the summer. She will be contributing personal blog entries throughout her internship, documenting the challenges of solving human rights issues in international settings.